.
.
Last edited by removethisaccount; 06-07-2015 at 01:30 PM.
For whatever reason I could kind of see EIE. LIE is an option too but I think you might be ethical. You seem rational.
avatar-pic has a look in the eyes that reminds me of a SLE cousin ...which however dunno if you are. only eyes and direct coldish stare, not posture. Other ideas >> SLI or some sorta Ni Ej.
You do vibe a bit Beta tho ... don't you have fewer pics? too many and too clear can cause public confusion.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
bolded sounds like Ni or in some ways ethical. I think Ni is often conflated with ethical functions sometimes (read the ILI descriptions. They often talk of reading people. Ethics seems more concerned with manipulation and installing the motives to Ni considering its a judging function, afaik). If you are convinced of irrationality, in your avatar you do VI like my IEI-Ni friend from high school. ILI is of course another option.
Barack Obama EIE
I was gonna say you remind me of Obama.
Yeah, you look like barack. Wasn't going to bring it up since it's not really constructive.
last pic (>>right) has a Che Guevara vibe http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...1/Heroico1.jpg
what kinda politics were you talking with Dude in the other.
I'd suggest looking into ESI maybe SLI ... wasn't thinking of Obama but now that he was brought up there's indeed some similarity (he's often typed as ISFj).
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...4-Barack-Obama
top votes: IEI and ESI. If you've ever read his book Audacity of Hope or anything written about him by people who know him, he's described as an introvert who needs time to himself to recharge and think things over.
You remind me of a SLI acquaintance.
EII 3w4 so/sp
lol, no, it's not. You see the differences because you are much more familiar with what you look like whereas we see you as closer in looks to Obama than most people we see. Even if there are some obvious differences, our brains are inclined to match you to a face we are already familiar with so we smooth over the differences for the sake of the comparison. It's more of a reflex than anything. At least it is for me.
copying from chatbox ~1 hour ago
Myst Today 12:49 AM lol Lucas you do remind me of obama in that pic
Myst Today 12:49 AM idk why someone said you have a cold stare. I'm guessing Fi-base if I must VI it.. lol
Myst Today 12:49 AM I dont believe much in VI in most cases
Myst Today 12:50 AM so take this for whatever its worth
Lucas - Report Shout Today 12:50 AM I really can't see any resemblance
Myst Today 12:51 AM well I thought of it even before I read the other replies in your thread. so.. unbiased there.
IJ looks pretty apparent. I too saw ESI.
I see dynamic and Ni in what he says:
Still reading the forum, the wiki, but it will take a while. I'm fairly sure I belong to a dynamic/negativist type, but that's about it. I'm kind of lost.
More information: I don't work well when there's someone observing. If I'm learning something and there is someone looking at me, I will get nervous, will make mistakes that I wouldn't when alone. Other things are similar: I even have trouble to walk without looking insane if there's people around, but that doesn't happen if tMore information: I don't work well when there's someone observing. If I'm learning something and there is someone looking at me, I will get nervous, will make mistakes that I wouldn't when alone. Other things are similar: I even have trouble to walk without looking insane if there's people around, but that doesn't happen if there are only friends or close people around, if it's an empty street etc. If I have to go to a social event, I will be nervous until I get there, because of the perspective of going there, and by entering I will be too self-conscious and more nervous, but afterwards I will find someone, or a small group, to talk to, and then I will relax.
(EIE suggestions here)
Balzac/ILI: "There is nothing he does not know about himself." But the comment on S/N is interesting: "The two types produce different impression even at a physical level when they enter a room. The sensoring type 'fills' the whole room as soon as he enters. You feel like 'there is a lot of him/her'. The intuitive type is ‘ hardly visible’." Definitely N. Also not sure about the objective logic.
Tutankhamon/IEI: Positivist, that's a problem. Ability to influence groups, maybe, specially when younger; "master organizer, (...) large groups...", don't think so. I want to know things, yes, but I'm not sure if the method described suits me. Not resisting external influence... Not sure about this one, but may come back to it.
Dreiser/ESI: Objective sensoring... I don't walk swiftly, specially if someone is looking at me while I walk, and never had any talent to dance. No good with finances, but don't care about living without money, yes. Years since the last time I went to the doctor, even having been really ill. I will come back to this one later.
Gaben/SLI: I'm not a practical person. "A Gaben would never argue, explain or prove anything — it's just not interesting."; "If I love someone, then I am a good person; if I do not (...) then I am bad." No, not like me at all.
ISTp final
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html