XIE and SXE aren’t “dishonest” and someone being interpreted as dishonest doesn’t make them “dishonest”
Also, that would be more enneagram-related
It makes sense, as I gave Todd a Dominant subtype, because some of his expressions and energy reminded me of xIE-Ni and he displays a lot of both Fe and
qaz00 Today, 06:21 PMWell, in SCS, both an IEE and SEE would fixate a lot on Ti. It is a mental super egoic spot in a perfection placement. They’d replace their Ti incompetence
Braingel Today, 05:55 PMThis was supposed to be in my reply to you, but the website had acted up. It even posted it but doesn’t show now: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...8b68f07894a5f&
Braingel Today, 05:43 PMIndeed, ILE and IEE they produce relations between objects.
Source
That said, there is nothing mentioned above
In this model I am working with, there is no such thing as “valued” or “unvalued”; it is only mental/vital. And an EII in this
Braingel Today, 05:18 PMI will make an analogy, from a realization I had before, about how overtime, these systems make building blocks to build the house of the real typology
Braingel Today, 05:11 PMDamn.. this guy is identical to two friends of mine and one youtuber (Lewis Howes - from school of greatness).
I typed my friends EIE and the youtuber
I think their logic in saying adherence to structure would go with Ne may have do with not only the internal content going to Ne in this model, but also
Braingel Today, 04:58 PM
Negative Descriptions
Well, you have to consider the fact socionics was invented by constipated looking people who kinda analyzed relationships more from the outside looking
Hot Scalding Gayser Today, 06:50 PM