Categories
Recent Articles
Recent PostsFirst mistake: claiming that something has to be "reviewed" by "professionals" to make it true. Things are true regardless of being
lavos Today, 12:59 AM
Yes. Running around with a broomstick between your legs throwing non-living balls is clearly not what they were doing in Harry Potter.
Coeruleum Blue Yesterday, 11:54 PM
Who is attempting to negate an aspect of reality?
Subteigh Yesterday, 11:41 PM
I don't believe Nardi's work has been peer-reviewed by professional psychologists.
I'm saying if you are making claims about what you observe,
Attempting to negate an aspect of reality, doesn't magically make dissapear what it registers (in those that it is still operational).
lavos Yesterday, 11:38 PM
Many people seem able to operate and observe Socionics. Are you perhaps inferring that these people are lying, or deluded, or.. ?
If you
Except that there are numerous people that "play quiddich". Are all these people deluded?
lavos Yesterday, 11:28 PM
I had written in my post above and on the board earlier that I have always seen Natalie Portman as both a Ti ego and as a highly sensitive empath; at
Disturbed Yesterday, 11:06 PM
No, it's more like saying "I've never seen anyone play quidditch, so quidditch must be made up for Harry Potter." (Those LARP-like quidditch
Coeruleum Blue Yesterday, 10:46 PM
Tag Cloud
To what extent do you believe in Model A?
You, and others, are attempting to negate observation and hidden pattern recognition, for some reason.
lavos Today, 01:01 AM