https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdWlRPCaDbA
And my old 80q if more information is needed. http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...eath-(Chakram)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdWlRPCaDbA
And my old 80q if more information is needed. http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...eath-(Chakram)
Last edited by Chakram; 06-28-2016 at 10:21 PM.
Hi,
my guess is ENFx.
I call myself batyote and I fight crime at night.
I'm not sure if this will matter for VI and such, but I've recently realized that I don't really like Si, when people talk about Si things (internal sensations, comfort, those things) it's pretty annoying.
The types that are Si PoLR are LIE and EIE, of course. I watched your video, and you probably are not LIE. Your face is much too expressive to be LIE. Some of your moves/expressions remind me of a male ESI friend of mine, but if you are EIE, maybe I'm seeing some kind of ethical thing.
I only know two EIE's irl, and I've only interacted with one of them in the past five years, but you do seem to be a bit like him, both in the cadence of your speech and the topics you talked about.
I have heard that EIE's are initially nervous in new social situations, but quickly master them. The EIE who was dating my sister did exactly that when he met our parents. He was obviously nervous, but came off as a really good guy.
You might also get a better idea of your type by asking which are the types you find attractive.
ni infp could be very well be it - seeing some Ni in the video
INTp?
I don't see any Fi;
you're sensitive to noise so maybe you are aware of your internal sensations hum. "If everybody didn't vote, what would be the point?" I sense some internal thought going on but not willing to share maybe. I sense some Ni going on in terms of evolution of this event.
I would say INTp because you said you want to climb Mt Everest. I feel like you want to expand on your energy, but you're practical too, kind of pragmatic, you state how much it would cost.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-29-2016 at 02:27 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
logical
LII maybe
Yeah i think LII. Your eyes look like my classmate who is LII
Last edited by maniac; 06-29-2016 at 07:48 AM.
intx (maaaaybe LII, not sure). Lol at enfx typings.
Watched more, ILI imo
Interesting divide here, I have generally thought that logical fits me better, but I could be biased. I also tend to be pretty indecisive though, not sure if that fits with logical types, but maybe that's because of irrational.
Last edited by Chakram; 06-29-2016 at 02:34 PM.
I've never met an indecisive ILI. LIE's tend to converge on a single answer fairly quickly, too. LII's give the situation a fair assessment, and then converge to a solution. ILE's sometimes never converge to a single solution, but they basically think most people are idiots. None of these types look as friendly as you do.
However, the EIE's I know appear fairly logical and also resist coming to a conclusion.
One is a pilot, he gave me a ride in his Aztec, and watching him do the pre-flight checks was quite impressive. He changed planes regularly, as his ideas for making money with them also changed regularly. He had a job (salesman, I think) to support his airplane habit.
The other EIE wanted to build and sell a carbon fiber-based stringed instrument, just strings and a board, I can't remember it's name. It took a lot of know-how from him (Logical) and cash from his LSE father to burn through many prototypes without ever making a salable item (Indecisive). (I watched him build one and stomp on it til it broke to test it's breaking point.) His greatest strength was using ethical arguments to convince his mother to pressure his father into funding this adventure, much to his father's lasting resentment. He is extremely adventurous and imaginative, and has a very hard time turning his dreams into reality. He eventually married an LSI who is extremely practical and supportive, and they are happy.
Yea I want to come to solutions most of the time but it's usually a difficult thing to attain because I'll just re-open it later. Which is why when I got typed as LIE, it seemed a bit strange and I never really accepted it even though the person was very firm in the decision. So you think EIE? Any other possibilities?
Inverse objective logic Te (-). Loss of values, money. Infringement of the order. Natural disasters. Traffic jams. “Facts are the objective reality.” Numbers, statistics. Loss of territory. Car breakage; TV, home appliance breakage. Dirt in the hall on the carpet.
That's a type confirmation for you
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Well, the technical term for my thoughts on you being an EIE is Wild-Ass Guess, since I'm not that great at typing people. I just have correlation biases. I get worse, the farther from my experience and my own Gamma Quadra a type is. The types I feel fairly confident about are Gammas LIE, ILI, ESI, and to a lesser extent SEE, Deltas LSE, SLI, IEE, and to a lesser extent EII, Beta IEI, LSI, SLE, and to a lesser extent EIE. Alpha, LII, SEI sometimes and ILE sometimes. I have no idea what an ESE looks like.
There are lots of other possibilities with respect to your type. The fact that you are looking for them points toward EIE.
There is a woman on the forum named Spider who, in my opinion, is an EIE, and she refused to settle on a type.
Why not take a socionics test, like this one: https://www.helloquizzy.com/tests/th...rsonality-test
Unfortunately, it is pretty easy to game, if you know what they are asking for.
Here is another one: http://www.sociotype.com/tests/
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
you're definitely the same type as this guy i worked with last summer. Unfortunately, i didn't get to know him well enough to type him. I was thinking EJ for him and maybe Delta or Alpha but that's as good of an approximation i could make. Beta of course would still be possible.
This is a good simplification of the functions. Would you please read them.and comment on which you use?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socionics
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
mb ENTP
I can hardly believe it myself but it looks like my first guess was right! ENFx; more precisely now: EIE.
I call myself batyote and I fight crime at night.
do you know your enneagram type?
do you find logical stuff hard like do you need help with math etc or does it come very easy to you? and what kinds of people are you attracted to?
When I was younger math was a bit harder for me. Now though, I've gotten much better at it and am at the top of my class in math in college, just college algebra though, haven't gotten to the higher maths yet. As long as I can have a good explanation of the underlying causes for the math I can generally pick up on it quickly. As for the kind of people I'm attracted to, I like people that are pretty straightforward, strong and know what they want, but also aren't by the books actually, I think I tend to be attracted more to dainty women, the girly girls I guess. Don't take that as all encompassing though.
Last edited by Chakram; 07-17-2016 at 03:42 PM.
Aww, someone I could totally hang out with type.
Not sure if you are shy or nervous. I am still watching but some of your answers are very similar to mine BUT you also say some things that reminded me of my ILI stepdad. He used to pay my cousins to throw out their gum. He HATED the sound and said they were, "like cows chewing cud". I had my IEI brother watching with me and when you mentioned the gum he said, "bro-fist" and touched my screen with the gesture. I see some Fe but not enough to be your base function. I don't think it is your polr.
You seem clearly introverted to me and obvious valuing Ni > Ne.
I might say ILI but you aren't as stoic as the ones I have known. Not that all will be so stoic. I would not rule out IEI at all by the video. I am going with a quick first impression of Ni base function, bit too warm for ILI. hahah
Edit: Do you actually see yourself as an extrovert? I mean you value privacy and the EIE I know personally do not rank privacy high on their list of values. I posted an introvert/extrovert test recently in psychology. If you are unsure of what you are, then maybe the test will help. I think it is a good one. Sometimes when people are unsure they are more of an ambivert. I can be a situational ambivert but my orientation is introvert by nature.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...roversion-Test
Last edited by Aylen; 06-29-2016 at 09:53 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I'm definitely a bit socially awkward at first, tending to be quiet until I know people better, getting to know them can be quick or slow, it depends on the person, as I'm sure it does for almost everyone.
In the traditional sense of the word, I would say I'm much more introverted.
I'm more interested in your enneagram. Are you always this jittery? Not being mean or funny, but your energy--even through the video--unsettles the 9 in me.
IEI-Ni, DCNH-H, 4w5-9w1-5w4, sx/sp, Aquarius sun, Leo rising
...
"From their lives, and not least from their greatest fault--their inability to communicate--we may understand one of the greatest errors of our civilization, that is, the superstitious belief in verbal statements, the boundless overestimation of instruction by means of words and methods."--C.G. Jung on the introverted irrational types
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Aylen you are iei right? How did you know that you were? If you don't mind me asking.
Yeah you could be five. Or, you feel liek a withdrawn type so 4,5,9. About your socionics type sometimes it feels like you seek reassurance from a T type. Like you wont say aything for sure. "im not sure about it", "likely type 5" etc but idk your type is hard.
Introverted imo