Ti subtypes of both LSIs and LIIs can be insufferable... usually the sheltered, small-town ones. If they are intelligent and insightful, some arrogance is tolerable/attractive.
EXEs are a mixed bag. We either get each other or not...rarely a middle ground.
IEEs can be overwhelming but likeable.
I agree with all of this. However I generally love Ti doms, even when they are being pedantic assholes. There are some that are so frustratingly stubborn that I will give up on them. But like you said their arrogance can be attractive.Originally Posted by EIE
I mean ExEs...do I really need to mention why we're annoying? lol
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Reference these sources for more clarification.
Definition of humor
(Entry 1 of 2)
1a : that quality which appeals to a sense of the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous : a funny or amusing quality Try to appreciate the humor of the situation.
b : the mental faculty of discovering, expressing, or appreciating the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous : the ability to be funny or to be amused by things that are funny a woman with a great sense of humor
c : something that is or is designed to be comical or amusing The book is a collection of American humor. not a fan of the comedian's brand of humor
2a : an often temporary state of mind imposed especially by circumstances was in no humor to listen
b : characteristic or habitual disposition or bent : temperament of cheerful humor
c in medieval physiology : a fluid or juice of an animal or plant specifically : one of the four fluids entering into the constitution of the body and determining by their relative proportions a person's health and temperament
d : a sudden, unpredictable, or unreasoning inclination : whim … conceived the humor of impeaching casual passers-by … and wreaking vengeance on them.— Charles Dickens the uncertain humors of nature
3a : a normal functioning bodily semifluid or fluid (such as the blood or lymph)
b physiology : a secretion (such as a hormone) that is an excitant of activity
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Also @Eudaimonia and @lkdhf qkb dear god can you ENF's just shut the fuck up please you people have the ability to argue and make the appearance of decent points but so little direction that the conversation you just had is the equivalent someone having a spasm while lying on the ground .
What the fuck are you on about? Do you need attention, is that it?
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Bad Badger! *squirts with water gun* Be nice to the ENF’s!
No
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
