Page 53 of 70 FirstFirst ... 34349505152535455565763 ... LastLast
Results 2,081 to 2,120 of 2795

Thread: Examples of Deltas

  1. #2081
    Moderator myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    2,034
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    she is an IEI. her musical themes are way too focused on symbolism, violence etc.
    I agree that their themes are focused on symbolism and violence. That's why I said it is generally associated with beta(SLE/IEI). I know some people would disagree. However, she seems like a sensor to me. On another note, I dont find their symbolism sophisticated enough but I also know that someone can be Ni ego and may not use too sophisticated symbolism in their art. I think she is cute but in a Si way, I dont see her Fe.

  2. #2082
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by myresearch View Post
    I agree that their themes are focused on symbolism and violence. That's why I said it is generally associated with beta(SLE/IEI). I know some people would disagree. However, she seems like a sensor to me. On another note, I dont find their symbolism sophisticated enough but I also know that someone can be Ni ego and may not use too sophisticated symbolism in their art. I think she is cute but in a Si way, I dont see her Fe.

    I find it really hard to see Si-Te in her

    https://i.imgur.com/MwnUzPS.jpg
    https://dianatrees.files.wordpress.c.../01/angel2.jpg
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d7/59...1aa3602c84.png
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/34/b7...62086d82e2.jpg

    she clearly focuses on her imagination, probably has a very high focus on Ni far removed from reality. I fail to see how she is a pragmatic sensing type.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  3. #2083
    Moderator myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    2,034
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I find it really hard to see Si-Te in her

    https://i.imgur.com/MwnUzPS.jpg
    https://dianatrees.files.wordpress.c.../01/angel2.jpg
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d7/59...1aa3602c84.png
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/34/b7...62086d82e2.jpg

    she clearly focuses on her imagination, probably has a very high focus on Ni far removed from reality. I fail to see how she is a pragmatic sensing type.
    I agree that pictures you shared indicates Ni, I dont think there is SiTe on those pictures. However, she isn't necessarily the one who is doing that, creating that, but surely she can be in the decision making process, it can be partially her choice to go with that route. Although as a band, I think Die Antwoord is more beta like, I disregarded that when I was typing her because that could be their marketing strategy and could be a result of their culture/environment (South Africa).

  4. #2084
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by myresearch View Post
    I agree that pictures you shared indicates Ni, I dont think there is SiTe on those pictures. However, she isn't necessarily the one who is doing that, creating that, but surely she can be in the decision making process, it can be partially her choice to go with that route. Although as a band, I think Die Antwoord is more beta like, I disregarded that when I was typing her because that could be their marketing strategy and could be a result of their culture/environment (South Africa).
    I think a common trait for IEI is that they absolutely want to have full control of their artistic pursuits and I personally doubt that other people are doing stuff for her. I found the band through an IEI who really loves yolandi. she was very happy when I told her they have the same type, but I personally don't like their music. don't feel like researching them again to prove my point so that's all I can say about her type I guess.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  5. #2085
    them's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    TIM
    itsp
    Posts
    190
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i agree with yolandi being sli. die antwoord is poking fun at things they have contempt for by posing as caricatures so outlandish people take the persona seriously. theyve had other music projects that were very different, this is just the one that happened to get really popular so theyve stuck with it longest. it's all a "big black joke" like they say in their song "fok julle naaiers" ("fuck you all") talking shit about people who don't quite get their dry humour. ninja seems a gamma type like comedian andrew dice clay.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    I understand by facts that telepathy exists. At now I experiment with future guessing.

  6. #2086
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    most intuitives here really need to do some jobs in construction/manufacturing or factories so they get an idea in their head who SLI really are, instead of typing weird artists as this type. the type is called Craftsman for a reason.

    think of SLI when you watch this video, the guy who makes the guided tour.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6HcB6uOKiM



    IEE
    Last edited by Still Alive; 04-16-2021 at 09:27 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  7. #2087
    Haikus Dr PissBender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    TIM
    IEE-Ne 7w8 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by them View Post
    i agree with yolandi being sli. die antwoord is poking fun at things they have contempt for by posing as caricatures so outlandish people take the persona seriously. theyve had other music projects that were very different, this is just the one that happened to get really popular so theyve stuck with it longest. it's all a "big black joke" like they say in their song "fok julle naaiers" ("fuck you all") talking shit about people who don't quite get their dry humour. ninja seems a gamma type like comedian andrew dice clay.
    Oh my fuck. If Yolandi is SLI I am going to become EIE.

  8. #2088
    Haikus Dr PissBender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    TIM
    IEE-Ne 7w8 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    most intuitives here really need to do some jobs in construction/manufacturing or factories so they get an idea in their head who SLI really are, instead of typing weird artists as this type. the type is called Craftsman for a reason.

    think of SLI when you watch this video, the guy who makes the guided tour.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6HcB6uOKiM



    IEE
    Yeah. They be typing truly Se/Fe people as SLI. Makes no fucking sense.

  9. #2089
    Haikus Dr PissBender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    TIM
    IEE-Ne 7w8 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    she is an IEI. her musical themes are way too focused on symbolism, violence etc.
    Yeah. They think she is SLI because of the superego imo. Reminds me of IEI Aurora.

    Listen to the calls she had with some Ben dude, he wanted them to apologize for hers and that crackhead Ninja's behavior over bullying some girl. She reeks of that Fe creative victim bs. No fucking way she is Fe polr. She knows how to control the emotional atmosphere. She also made up bullshit over obvious shit, she shits on Te evidence and tries to twist everything in her favour even if it doesn't make sense (Te polr).

    EDIT: here's the link:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eq_bkNZzQc
    Last edited by Dr PissBender; 04-17-2021 at 04:51 AM.

  10. #2090
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr PissBender View Post
    Yeah. They think she is SLI because of the superego imo. Reminds me of IEI Aurora.

    Listen to the calls she had with some Ben dude, he wanted them to apologize for hers and that crackhead Ninja's behavior over bullying some girl. She reeks of that Fe creative victim bs. No fucking way she is Fe polr. She knows how to control the emotional atmosphere. She also made up bullshit over obvious shit, she shits on Te evidence and tries to twist everything in her favour even if it doesn't make sense (Te polr).

    EDIT: here's the link:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eq_bkNZzQc
    I agree that Aurora is an IEI, but I don't think I can watch this video. don't enjoy seeing people having arguments with each other. guess it's role Fi. I usually just leave a place if people do that irl.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  11. #2091

    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    most intuitives here really need to do some jobs in construction/manufacturing or factories so they get an idea in their head who SLI really are, instead of typing weird artists as this type. the type is called Craftsman for a reason.

    think of SLI when you watch this video, the guy who makes the guided tour.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6HcB6uOKiM



    IEE
    This is a NF right? Cause she doesn't give off care giver vibes, more resource guarding vibes.

  12. #2092
    Haikus Dr PissBender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    TIM
    IEE-Ne 7w8 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I agree that Aurora is an IEI, but I don't think I can watch this video. don't enjoy seeing people having arguments with each other. guess it's role Fi. I usually just leave a place if people do that irl.
    I'd say it is your Se polr. I am Fi creative and no way in hell I have issues with that, clearly.

  13. #2093
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr PissBender View Post
    I'd say it is your Se polr. I am Fi creative and no way in hell I have issues with that, clearly.
    a couple of days ago two friends got in an argument about something while I was standing around and one of them started lecturing the other and I was just like "ok I'm out" and just left without saying anything to them. maybe it's also suggestive Fe since I mostly prefer positive emotions dunno it's a really strong characteristic of me. I also don't like to listen to other people's relationship problems.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  14. #2094
    Haikus Dr PissBender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    TIM
    IEE-Ne 7w8 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    a couple of days ago two friends got in an argument about something while I was standing around and one of them started lecturing the other and I was just like "ok I'm out" and just left without saying anything to them. maybe it's also suggestive Fe since I mostly prefer positive emotions dunno it's a really strong characteristic of me. I also don't like to listen to other people's relationship problems.
    Yeah. Sounds like that. I love the shit talk. Me and my SLI bestfriend are often taking the piss on others lol. An ESE-LII worst nightmare.

  15. #2095
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,358
    Mentioned
    358 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is probably safe to put yolandi rest in beta. The stuff is clearly blown off proportions so I don't want to type them as real peeps.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  16. #2096
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Megatrop showed me this channel and I think she is also an IEE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fjhk1K-ow58



    it's interesting that she sees herself as an introvert, and I think she is a normalising or harmonsing subtype.

    these are also women who I think are IEE

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzL...fuVSEHkMGEq7Vg (she is imo a creative subtype)
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnQ...P-DnbUZtIMrupw
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZe_uzZ6VLMXtwW2V9-VvpQ

    they all remind me of women I have spend time with in berlin.
    Last edited by Still Alive; 04-17-2021 at 10:50 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  17. #2097
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    I think both are IEE
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  18. #2098
    may's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    665
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    LSE, SLI, IEE left to right



    SLI, ILE left to right

    Talking about his SLI father.

  19. #2099
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Chloé Zhao seems like an IEE to me. her film nomadland won the oscar. (interview starts at 9:35)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  20. #2100
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    SLI
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  21. #2101
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,935
    Mentioned
    1612 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post


    SLI

    I think the guy's an LSE extrovert. He doesn't really reflect into his head between sentences. Plus, there's that mustache and that Heh Heh heh laugh.

  22. #2102
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    I think the guy's an LSE extrovert. He doesn't really reflect into his head between sentences. Plus, there's that mustache and that Heh Heh heh laugh.
    I considered LSE, too, but he has a rather monotonous voice which seems more of an Ip trait. we talk faster about topics that interest us, so we can seem extroverted at that moment. in the end, it doesn't matter all that much to me since he obviously won't share a lot of private information on his channel to clearly figure out his type, and it's not an interest that I care all that much about. I just thought he was interesting because he seemed like a clear delta ST example.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  23. #2103
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,935
    Mentioned
    1612 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I considered LSE, too, but he has a rather monotonous voice which seems more of an Ip trait. we talk faster about topics that interest us, so we can seem extroverted at that moment. in the end, it doesn't matter all that much to me since he obviously won't share a lot of private information on his channel to clearly figure out his type, and it's not an interest that I care all that much about. I just thought he was interesting because he seemed like a clear delta ST example.
    I think that guy might have been a forumite before I got here. Ask @ashlesha, she might know.

    There was some YouTube guy from the forum who shot his lawnmower on video, IIRC.

  24. #2104
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post


    SLI

    so I watched a couple more videos and I'm more and more sure that my SLI typing is correct. in this video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmVJYB3uDkc

    he mentions in the beginning that he can only really do videos when he is in the mood for it, which shows that he's an irrational type. he uses his creative Te very well, giving impersonal instructions about technical equipment. @qaz00 if you know any other SLI on youtube, feel free to send me a pm. it's hard for me to find them.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  25. #2105
    Not your echo chamber. qaz00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    HN-SLI-Te 5w4(14)p/x
    Posts
    959
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    @qaz00 if you know any other SLI on youtube, feel free to send me a pm. it's hard for me to find them.
    I can't help, I rarely watch anything on youtube, I prefer reading articles to get interesting info fast.

  26. #2106
    Haikus Dr PissBender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    TIM
    IEE-Ne 7w8 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Me, i'm awesome.

  27. #2107

    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Aether
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asd View Post

    have I posted this already? I may have posted another video or just mentioned him; but yeah, SLI.
    Definite SLI, I agree. I think this has been posted elsewhere too, but here's him with his dual future wife :)


  28. #2108
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,084
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw_KV9WgPUw

    watched this interview out of curiosity and I think he might be an IEI-C

    just my 2 cents
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  29. #2109

  30. #2110
    PinKDiGiT18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I’ve been unduly obsessed with Astrid Bergés-Frisbey forever, and I am convinced she is LSE-Si.

    EDE0B44C-7FDA-41E2-A76D-000B95EB4458.jpeg

  31. #2111
    tuathe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    meh
    TIM
    EII-Fi
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PinKDiGiT18 View Post
    I’ve been unduly obsessed with Astrid Bergés-Frisbey forever, and I am convinced she is LSE-Si.
    Oh? We'd love to hear your argumentation then.
    EII-Fi
    2w3 sx/so
    tritype: 2-6-9


  32. #2112
    PinKDiGiT18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuathe View Post
    Oh? We'd love to hear your argumentation then.
    I really only have visual identification to go by, but what brought me to the conclusion was a mixture of soft Si ego-like eyes and a sense of style that is reminiscent of my LSE-Si cousin’s. She has certain angularity of facial features like Robin Wright, who is also that type according to some Socionics galleries and they share some facial expressions. Watching her and hearing her speak is relaxing to me, which happens to me with LSEs of Si-sub but not Te-sub. I don’t think she is ESE because in interviews she exhibits a certain awkwardness that is not typical of Fe bases or egos. On the flip side, as an actress she tends to choose roles that are emotionally expressive (suggesting Fe role over PoLR).

    I also considered ESI for her, but she seems too Si-valuing.
    Last edited by PinKDiGiT18; 05-03-2021 at 06:41 PM.

  33. #2113
    tuathe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    meh
    TIM
    EII-Fi
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PinKDiGiT18 View Post
    I really only have visual identification to go by, but what brought me to the conclusion was a mixture of soft Si ego-like eyes and a sense of style that is reminiscent of my LSE-Si cousin’s. She has certain angularity of facial features like Robin Wright, who is also that type according to some Socionics galleries and they share some facial expressions. Watching her and hearing her speak is relaxing to me, which happens to me with LSEs of Si-sub but not Te-sub. I don’t think she is ESE because in interviews she exhibits a certain awkwardness that is not typical of Fe bases or egos. On the flip side, as an actress she tends to choose roles that are emotionally expressive (suggesting Fe role over PoLR).

    I also considered ESI for her, but she seems too Si-valuing.
    These aren't very compelling arguments if you ask me.
    EII-Fi
    2w3 sx/so
    tritype: 2-6-9


  34. #2114
    PinKDiGiT18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuathe View Post
    These aren't very compelling arguments if you ask me.
    Yeah, this is more my subjective POV than anything else. But on the chance that it’s a correct assessment, I wanted to throw her in at least.

  35. #2115
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,759
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuathe View Post
    These aren't very compelling arguments if you ask me.
    There are no "very compelling arguments" with today methods as all those are highly speculative. And there are many mistakes with all methods too, what is see by low typing matches.
    Besides it's useless to say any arguments to random forum noobs which can't understand them correctly. And intuitive methods as VI are widely used, have significant weight in opinions to make logical explanations weaker without VI factor and are not supposed to have arguments at all, what noobs may forget.
    So, in general to ask for arguments about someone types is significantly useless. I understand, that noobs like to play in argumentations. But it's not very serious except cases to reject some types, alike to point that to have base Fi type does not match with your rude talking style. But not about whole type.

    No one will give good arguments. At least, for the ones with some competence in typology. Noobs are not so, they may be convinced by any nonsense and can't often understand correctly even own types, alike in your case.
    Last edited by Sol; 05-03-2021 at 10:50 PM.

  36. #2116
    PinKDiGiT18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asd View Post
    Do you have experience IRL with each sub? Pros/cons interacting with each sub?

    I know there’s more to someone and our relationship with them than type but I was just curious.

    Te subs can sometimes rub me the wrong way too, a little bit, too much Te+Se, not soft enough. But I’m not sure if it’s something else
    Oh. My. Goodness. Let me tell you, it’s not just in your head.

    Te-LSEs, depending on stuff like strength of subtype + enneagram, instinctual stk., etc...it can create such a world of difference from your unconscious expectations. I have typed my uncle as 3Te-LSE, and of all the LSEs I have ever met you would think he were my conflictor. He is definitely LSE - not to be rude, but every stereotype you’ve ever heard about them describes him. And as some people read this I’m probably going to get the “oh, you’re not EII” “you mistyped” shpiel but it’s a real phenomenon that I’ve seen happen with almost every type and the reason I firmly believe in subtype as a factor of overall sociotype.

    Observation - the stronger the base subtype, the more that person actively implements their demonstrative in their activities. My hypothesis about it is that their HA and their PoLR are more developed (connected respectively to the Ignoring and Base), so they have a bit more “give” when pressured and expect the same from their duals. So Te-LSEs are using Se more conspicuously with less Si “cushioning” because they are oriented at Fi-EIIs, who can “take it.” Si-LSEs use it more often, but behind the scenes of Si so as to not hurt Ne-EII’s PoLR. I also notice that while EII-Ne still is Fi-base, we aren’t wired to give as much ethical support at our own expense to Te-sub LSEs as it seems they require. Somehow, no matter how dry the Te-subtype gets, it does not seem to hurt the Fi-subtype. Don’t know why, but at some point I need some sort of reciprocity, and both my Si-LSE and Ni-LIE cousins are good with knowing when to meet me in the middle. On the positive side, when a healthy Te-sub comes into my life, I find them very attractive, intelligent, and respectable individuals. Once you have gained their trust, they are often even more reliable than the other sub. My first real love was LSE-Te...

    My ILI-Te mom had a similar experience to what I had with my uncle when I was with my SEE-Se ex-boyfriend. Every single base sub of sociotype I have met has at least appeared to have a PoLR that is less sensitive to hits than the creative subtype, and this can be apparent even in duality. Not saying this as a generalization, just my experience.
    Last edited by PinKDiGiT18; 05-04-2021 at 12:10 AM.

  37. #2117
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,828
    Mentioned
    914 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    There are no "very compelling arguments" with today methods as all those are highly speculative. And there are many mistakes with all methods too, what is see by low typing matches. Besides it's useless to say any arguments to random forum noobs which can't understand them correctly.
    <3 <3 <3 u r my semi-dual i swear it

  38. #2118
    PinKDiGiT18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sojourn View Post
    Joel Kinnaman, LSE (gives me e8 vibes)




    I literally had to take off my glasses when I saw this man. Now THAT is fine.

  39. #2119
    PinKDiGiT18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asd View Post
    3Te sub does sound intimidating even in theory lol. I usually get 1Ne sub when I test on sociotype.com, and there are aspects of both Fi and Ne sub description that apply and don't apply to me so - I though I am "close enough to the middle" and didn't really look further into subtypes...

    interesting, one of the subtype theories says something like, if intuition is strengthened, then it's both of them and it ultimately takes away from sensation (in keeping with Jung's original theory about how types develop). So that's in line with what you are saying about PoLR yeah...but personally I feel like I have certain instances of being drawn to Ni things, just having a strong intuition that something is a certain way and believing in it, and other things I won't list here. But I have also been brought up in half Gamma NT family so I think that plays a role. I have wondered if Ne sub EII kinda gives NT vibes (which is mentioned in another subtype theory haha). Online I have gotten that a couple of times.

    I thought perhaps I just haven't come across compatible duals but the roughness of weak Fi with LSEs can really rub me the wrong way/scare me sometimes. I thought I was just "sensitive."

    Once I had a crush on an SLI (Si). It wasn't mutual but - I learned that I could trust someone, that it was possible to - like I have never before or even after. He would say the same things to me that I would find invalidating and triggering if it came from quite literally any other person but, from him, I somehow on a visceral level completely trusted him and it was never invalidating to me. The LSEs I meet, in contrast (mostly online) seem to rub me the wrong way. I can also be quite emotional once you do get to know me - it could be E4 or however we want to conceptualize it but - I am not truly stoic. But I am also scared but the potential of an LSE-Si being a little too irrational perhaps. For instance, the SLI-EII description...it mentions basically the SLI gets tired of the Fi and literally just starts tuning EII out, going on breaks by himself, and hurting her. Establishing psychological distance in that way.

    I do not want someone who is bored by Fi, because Fi and seeking closeness - the closer the better - makes me happy and also fuels my sx so they are intertwined. I also cannot be with someone who kind of just...expects me to be random and funny much of the time. I can be quite serious honestly - my Ne more so manifests in theorizing (for which I get labeled NT lol).

    edit: I wanted to explain this better. Fi HAs can get scared off by Fi, by my seeking closeness. But it doesn't mean it has to be literally 24/7. I just want someone I feel close to/one with even when I am not talking to him. And that when we do speak, the sense of closeness brings joy not strain or burden. .

    But yeah that thing you said about LSE-Si using Se behind the scenes - I absolutely love it. That's how I imagine my potential SO. To be fair, even LSE-Tes tend to get softer around me - or likely will at least in person but - I feel so much more comfortable and myself with someone who uses Se behind the scenes as needed in a protective manner. I think the Te+Se thing I mentioned is sort of classic "Type A" personality with aggression and ambition combined which can tend to be a bit too much for me. I liked my SLI friend's Fi which was just enough to understand the level of gentleness I required and he in response treated me with care.

    Regarding giving LSE-Te Fi help, I am not entirely sure what it looks like? So I do not know how much Fi help they would require. I guess I imagine LSEs as someone who do generally have quite good integrity themselves; they may just push it to the background a bit when over-concerned with a Te matter in the present. But mostly I imagine Fi "help" as helping them figure out their thoughts/feelings/attitudes and bring it to the consciousness (and the rest follows - including ethical behavior). Although I really don't mind giving them pointers on that, but like I said, if the Fi is too rough, it tends to scare me.

    was? Did you guys end up not being compatible, if you don't mind me asking?
    I’m a 1Ne sub, an ennea4 and an sx-lead too!!

    It’s like I’m reading my own mind. I don’t get the opportunity to talk to other EIIs a lot so I’m just fangirling right now

    I had a crush on an SLI-Si friend with whom it wasn’t reciprocal either. I also had an SLI-Si childhood best friend with whom I experienced that feeling of, man they just get it. We called each other kindred spirits, and I still think that holds true. But SLIs of the Si subtype do seem to get stifled by our Fi after a while. I’ve had people tell me that even when I try not to emphasize it, they can feel it lingering in the background. It’s a pity because otherwise it’s such a harmonious relation!

    Yes, for real. I can quickly tell when there’s an LSE-Si around me just because the psychological atmosphere instantly settles, like a storm just suddenly clearing into a blue sky when you get into their presence. And I second what you said about LSE-Tes softening around us - after detailing my tumultuous dynamic with my uncle, I must admit even he is sometimes touched by my Fi. It can be really endearing.

    With my LSE-Te romance, it was a sexuality issue...we had feelings for each other but he was in the closet before I came into the picture and did not want to commit to a woman. We shared passions and talents we’d never shared with others and we were always better together than apart. To me, he was my soulmate. But he started to take advantage of my loyalty to him in spite of knowing his situation, and I couldn’t continue. It was when we were over that he realized what my presence meant for him (duality-wise), but...it is what it is. He did teach me how beautiful duality can be, though.

  40. #2120
    tuathe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    meh
    TIM
    EII-Fi
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    There are no "very compelling arguments" with today methods as all those are highly speculative. And there are many mistakes with all methods too, what is see by low typing matches.
    Besides it's useless to say any arguments to random forum noobs which can't understand them correctly. And intuitive methods as VI are widely used, have significant weight in opinions to make logical explanations weaker without VI factor and are not supposed to have arguments at all, what noobs may forget.
    So, in general to ask for arguments about someone types is significantly useless. I understand, that noobs like to play in argumentations. But it's not very serious except cases to reject some types, alike to point that to have base Fi type does not match with your rude talking style. But not about whole type.
    Are you calling competency basing typings on arbitrary stuff like one's facial features they have no control over, instead of taking a look at their actual personality? Wow, I haven't seen someone spew so much bullshit in one post in a loooong time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    No one will give good arguments. At least, for the ones with some competence in typology. Noobs are not so, they may be convinced by any nonsense and can't often understand correctly even own types, alike in your case.
    Said the guy who after being into this typology for 10 years still makes rookie mistakes and types himself LSE when it's blatantly obvious to anyone watching is not the case. Besides, the only reason you have for accusing me of mistyping myself is because I told you off when you tried to convince me I must be something else but not an EII because I wasn't your dreamy INFP girl. You're ridiculous, as always.
    EII-Fi
    2w3 sx/so
    tritype: 2-6-9


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •