Originally Posted by
Sol
LII is INTJ in MBTI. ILI = INTP
LII is rational type. description of J preference in MBTI test and texts is _identical_ to description of rationality dichotomy in Socionics. J = rationality. you may look at Socionics dichotomy tests and to see this, besides descriptions of dichotomies
That MBTI texts say about different functions of INTJ as Ni-Te changes nothing. As MBTI practice identifies types _mainly_ by preferences but not by 8 functions. Also that INTJ has Ni-Te, that judgment/rational type has as leading perceiving/irrational function, - is a mistake and contradicts to Jung.
If you get INTP in MBTI and this is _correctly_ (mistakes are not rare). And then you are correctly typed in Socionics or by other correct types theories - you'll always get ILI (Ni-Te).
While notations as "INTj" are senseless. It's one of examples of wrong info in some of Socionics sources.
Also
It's possibly to get incorrect results by different methods. And it's possibly when other factors besides Jung types change a behavior to lesser common for some types. So you may get different J/P by MBTI and Socionics typers, same as you may get different other 3 dichotomies. And may have some kinds of a behavior shifted closer to common for other types than you have, including related to J/P. This are practical problems to understand types correctly.