Video Questionnaire

[Minde]

Lot of questions lol, I'll try cover most of them as best I can.

Yes, I felt curious. Thanks for humoring me.

So pretty much since I can remember I knew I was "trans", I just didn't know there was a word for it. I knew I was more girly, I knew I felt wrong as a male. In fact one of my earlier memories from when I was about 5: someone at school asked me if I wanted to be a girl and I was just like "yeah".
I think I've always kinda leaned more towards the "sassy feminine" rather than the traditional, dainty housewife type feminine one may think of.

That makes sense, yes. Were you overall supported in how you felt?

As for the emotional people, I wouldn't say I'm bad at dealing with it, I just don't like to for reasons I stated above. But in general I try get that person laughing again to keep up with the emotional atmosphere I am creating. If that fails, I'll usually tell them to leave. Sorry it's hard for me to give examples, I don't really remember specific details ahah.

No worries. If anything comes to mind I'd like to hear it. But I can understand if it's more of a gestalt impressions thing than standalone scenarios.

I've pretty much always wanted to be in control of groups. I've always actually been really aware of how to tailor this to a particular group. Like in primary school, my group of friends were the clever kids so to take control I would kind of rub it in that I was the smartest of them. Not to be mean, but to show I was in charge.
So I like strategy games that have a people element. Can't name any specifically, but games where you have to try deceive people, form an alliance etc. are right up my street. Even in games like monopoly I try to influence the emotional state of others to give myself an advantage - pretending I'm gonna give up to get other players to let their guard down for example.

Ahah, that's helpful.

I've been growing my hair since I was about 10 haha, obviously had it trimmed plenty of times since then. Thanks for the compliment, I just don't like the colour haha - any suggestions for a colour that may look good on me would be nice

Oh, geez, I'm not a good person to ask about that, lol. The best I can do is maybe ask what kind of effect are you going for? Then suggest you find someone who can help you get that effect.

My creative expressions tend to be whatever pleases or touches me personally. If people end up liking it or being touched by it, great. But I'm not good at creating impressions or even knowing "what would look good" to people.

[QueenTiger666]

That makes sense, yes. Were you overall supported in how you felt?

By close friends yeah, by others not really tbh

[Breather]

Have you considered IEI-Fe?

[Beautiful sky]

Q-tip is too withdrawn, girly and low energy for SLE-Ti. Even quieter SLEs exude a force-field around them. Bottom line...SLEs present as formidable, male or female, not wimpy.

I'll repost what I wrote on the other thread:

Qtig does not even get to the pre-qualification phase for consideration of SLE because she is too girly, withdrawn, and low energy (don't believe me, watch tig's video). No SLE-Ti would put those bunny ears on their picture/avatar. Furthermore, Sky from Blue Ink, Coral from Real World, Camilla Poindexter and many other female SLEs all come across as ass-whippers. When I am sure that any of those women would beat Qtig up in a fight with one hand tied behind their backs, then I don't even have to reach consideration of SLE because there is no possible way the person can be SLE. For me to even consider somebody SLE, they have to be able to at least hold their own against Sky, Coral or Camilla in a fight, and this Qtig cannot do....watch Qtip's video, any one of those women would toss her around like a ragdoll. [Keep in mind that Qtig's 3w4 ego identifies with what it perceives as the rarer, more assertive types (triple assertive & SLE-Ti)....it's like recurring They show up as 9s or 3s and then after they spend some time on the forum they become triple expansive/assertive styles with sx/so 8w7 as the primary and either SLE or LIE for their socionics type. SLE/LIE 837 sx/so is now like the lamborghini of typology where people just want to be seen driving around in it. lol ]

Qtig is more like a Katie Hopkins or Tiffany Pollard. That's a much better fit. They just do a lot of compensatory posturing but they couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag. Though, they swear up and down they can.

https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...66#post1331366

yes after all they are Alpha males

also if they are rather on the skinny or lean side they will scrutinize or present objects around him in such a way as to make them smaller them them.

[QueenTiger666]

Anyone who types me as an ILE/ESE/LSE is severely retarded and doesn't understand socionics in the slightest. Anyone who has typed me as these 3 types literally doesn't get an opinion.

[timber]

[cry]

you haven't posted for a month and this is what you return with lol

[flames]

Yeah, you show them girl!!!

[QueenTiger666]

you haven't posted for a month and this is what you return with lol

Of course, shouldn't surprise you.

[Chthonic Daydream]

Same.

[gone]

I type you ILE, ESE or LSE, not sure which

[Metamorph]

I type you as EIE for being a drama queen.

[The Reality Denialist]

Ok then, mr LII.

[QueenTiger666]

I type you as EIE for being a drama queen.

Better than the above typings

[QueenTiger666]

I type you ILE, ESE or LSE, not sure which

You're funny, I like you.

[QueenTiger666]

Ok then, mr LII.

That's more you than me, fat fuck.

[Simo]

Those who typed you ILE/ESE/LSE agree that you are extroverted and Ne/Si valuing so I guess I will go with IEE for you

[QueenTiger666]

Those who typed you ILE/ESE/LSE agree that you are extroverted and Ne/Si valuing so I guess I will go with IEE for you

Anyone who thinks I value Ne/Si should be banned from this site lol.

[Simo]

Anyone who thinks I value Ne/Si should be banned from this site lol.

That's cruel
Well personally I think people have the right to think whatever they want but they don't have the right to impose it on anyone else

[QueenTiger666]

That's cruel
Well personally I think people have the right to think whatever they want but they don't have the right to impose it on anyone else

Well I mean it's a socionics site, and those that type me as Ne/Si valuing clearly don't know about the topic itself so shouldn't be here.

[Sol]

you are beta F with good possibility

the main reason for mistyping is the lack of typing skills
you before assigned yourself the type EST* yep, it's funny

[QueenTiger666]

you are beta F with good possibility

the main reason for mistyping is the lack of typing skills
you before assigned yourself the type EST* yep, it's funny

And you are a boring delta hoe with 100% possibility.
you assigned myself the type IEI yep, it's funny.

[Sol]

previously in your profile were: LIE, EIE
now SEE
*sigh*

Fi types care about be polite, to be more emotionally comfortable. they do not start themes with Fe style "marks" in the subject

noobs...

[QueenTiger666]

previously in your profile were: LIE, EIE
now SEE
*sigh*

Fi types care about be polite, to be more emotionally comfortable. they do not start themes with Fe style "marks" in the subject

noobs...

"Fi types care about be polite" - pretty sure that's actually more related to Fe+. SEEs are 4D Se+ and 4D Fe-, not a polite combo if you ask me.

[gone]

you def seem Se ego, there's a sense of "territory" to you. SEE, SLE or LSI is what I'd guess in no particular order. I'd say your current typing works based on the little I know of you.

[QueenTiger666]

you def seem Se ego, there's a sense of "territory" to you. SEE, SLE or LSI is what I'd guess in no particular order. I'd say your current typing works based on the little I know of you.

Seems to make sense.

[Aylen]

previously in your profile were: LIE, EIE
now SEE
*sigh*

Fi types care about be polite, to be more emotionally comfortable. they do not start themes with Fe style "marks" in the subject

noobs...

I can remember that you have typed some people here Fi egos that have been far from polite and some who are polite Fe egos. It's not like she is self typing EII. Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals. They are quite rare as far as you are concerned.

[QueenTiger666]

I can remember that you have typed some people here Fi egos that have been far from polite and some who are polite Fe egos. It's not like she is self typing EII. Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals. They are quite rare as far as you are concerned.

Also pretty strange how Sol (an impolite Fi valuer) makes the claim that all "Fi types" (not just Fi egos) are polite.

[Exodus]

@Aylen may I ask why I was censored and warned for politely questioning this user's gender identity, then they come back and start a whole thread just to call people "severely retarded" (and @Heretic 007 "fat fuck") with no consequence?

Does that seem fair to you?

[QueenTiger666]

@Aylen may I ask why I was censored and warned for politely questioning this user's gender identity, then they come back and start a whole thread just to call people "severely retarded" (and @Heretic 007 "fat fuck") with no consequence?

Does that seem fair to you?

Because there is a difference between being hyperbolic (what I did) and being transphobic (what you did). I mean it makes sense you'd struggle with grasping these concepts since you're an "LII" but hey.

[Aylen]

@Aylen may I ask why I was censored and warned for politely questioning this user's gender identity, then they come back and start a whole thread just to call people "severely retarded" (and @Heretic 007 "fat fuck") with no consequence?

Does that seem fair to you?

Did I officially warn you or was it someone else? I believe I spoilered some posts from several users in that thread you are talking about because everyone was reporting everyone. It wasn't just one person complaining about the gender issue you brought up in a typing thread.

[Exodus]

Did I officially warn you or was it someone else?

No, but you censored my post with the reason being "personal attack".

[QueenTiger666]

No, but you censored my post with the reason being "personal attack".

Let's not act like you were the only one who that happened to. My personal attacks against you were also censored.

[Aylen]

No, but you censored my post with the reason being "personal attack".

It was taken as a personal attack on her by several forum members from what I remember. If you check you will probably see I also spoilered someone's post to you as a personal attack too in that thread. It was not exactly censoring since I didn't delete or alter the content. It is still there for a reason. If you wanted to post your thoughts on transgender issues you could have started a general thread in a non socionics subforum and had a discussion without singling out a new forum member who was just asking to be typed. I am sure she is not the only transgender person on this forum. Beyond that others are also questioning their own gender in other ways.

[Exodus]

@Aylen the fact remains that open trolls and harassment are going and have gone without consequence on this forum, including the very confused individual who started this thread. Flaming, trolling, and personal attacks are all supposedly against the rules here. Either enforce the rules or get rid of them so we know where the administration stands.

[QueenTiger666]

@Aylen the fact remains that open trolls and harassment are going and have gone without consequence on this forum, including the very confused individual who started this thread. Flaming, trolling, and personal attacks are all supposedly against the rules here. Either enforce the rules or get rid of them so we know where the administration stands.

"very confused individual" could be considered a personal attack, so perhaps you shouldn't continue down this path.

[para]

EIE

[Sol]

I can remember that you have typed some people here Fi egos that have been far from polite

It's important the degree and conditions. With what was done against being polite - the _possibility_ to have Fi type is low.

Should be taken cases when I typed with assurance to Fi. Then. I may type people which have partly uncommon for a type behavior to that type if VI pointed to that type strong enough to overweight the existence of uncommon behavior. when _other_ factors besides Jung types may predispose to that behavior. as types related nonverbal is _harder_ to be changed by other factors in a way to give _assured_ impression of other type

Also Fe valued types may perceive Fi types worse, - their behavior as lesser morally appropriate. I evaluate by my taste, which may perceive Fi types easier, taking concrete cases and with overal more positive impression.

> and some who are polite Fe egos

It's not so hard to follow nonvalued norms of strong functions, especially in forum texts. To fit better norms of any regions is a normal intention. It's more important what norms people break as that points on good chance those are weak or nonvalued regions.
If a human has F type and breaks much Fi norms - those are doubtful to be valued. With matching results of VI there is more basis to point on this, as this trait has more chance to be correct.

I remember a single case when a girl I typed to ESI with assurance. While the behavior was stably, rather and senseleslly rude on a forum.
Here is Number 9 which behaves strangely for Fi. I suppose SEE for him as most possible, though not sure still. I suspect lesser standard mind or he gets something what rises hooliganism. If VI would pointed to Fe, than I'd gladly thought him so.
Do not remember others. They could fit to be generally polite in my perception.

> Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals

there are borders which fit to norms. when the borders are stably strongly broken = good factor to suppose another type

previosly was base Fe in the profile. and mb several T types. seems Fi in the first time. with such progress there may appear EII what would be abolute blasphemy

[QueenTiger666]

EIE

I see the misunderstanding, since SEEs and EIEs share the same function charges, along with sharing 4D Fe-

[QueenTiger666]

It's important the degree and conditions. With what was done against being polite - the _possibility_ to have Fi type is low.

Should be taken cases when I typed with assurance to Fi. Then. I may type people which have partly uncommon for a type behavior to that type if VI pointed to that type strong enough to overweight the existence of uncommon behavior. when _other_ factors besides Jung types may predispose to that behavior. as types related nonverbal is _harder_ to be changed by other factors in a way to give _assured_ impression of other type

Also Fe valued types may perceive Fi types worse, - their behavior as lesser morally appropriate. I evaluate by my taste, which may perceive Fi types easier, taking concrete cases and with overal more positive impression.

> and some who are polite Fe egos

It's not so hard to follow nonvalued norms of strong functions, especially in forum texts. To fit better norms of any regions is a normal intention. It's more important what norms people break as that points on good chance those are weak or nonvalued regions.
If a human has F type and breaks much Fi norms - those are doubtful to be valued. With matching results of VI there is more basis to point on this, as this trait has more chance to be correct.

I remember a single case when a girl I typed to ESI with assurance. While the behavior was stably, rather and senseleslly rude on a forum.
Here is Number 9 which behaves strangely for Fi. I suppose SEE for him as most possible, though not sure still. I suspect lesser standard mind or he gets something what rises hooliganism. If VI would pointed to Fe, than I'd gladly thought him so.
Do not remember others. They could fit to be generally polite in my perception.

> Stick to idealizing/idolizing your duals

there are borders which fit to norms. when the borders are stably strongly broken = good factor to suppose another type

previosly was base Fe in the profile. and mb several T types. seems Fi in the first time. with such progress there may appear EII what would be abolute blasphemy

And with that, down goes the English language.