Don't take Aushras definitions of IMs at face value. They are not very good imo. Actually, I would just forget them.
Don't take Aushras definitions of IMs at face value. They are not very good imo. Actually, I would just forget them.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote