See what Big 5 traits you are visually attracted to!

[Samuel Leopold]

Among the pictures of the women I was most attracted to high agreeableness and high extroversion. What I find remarkable is how similar the group of faces in each figure is to each other, even as I understand that these faces are composites.

[Alomoes]

Those are just pictures of the same person with a slightly different expression. Garbage. I have litterally caught myself with a different expression in a similar manner.

In other words, I'm a superficial autist who cannot differentiate between them. They're all equally ugly.

To be fair though, when I took a test to decide if I could tell the emotions a person was feeling from their picture, I got litterally the same results as if I guessed. This was after multiple tries.

WAIT. If I look at it from far away (or in my case, without enlarging the photo), I can see it. I can see the colors. Quality. Loophole!

High openess. I like myself, apparently. Second pick is low extraversion.

Also, I know someone who looks like high concientious. Probably the case. She would also qualify for high neuroticism, although I'm probably the worst person to be around for someone who is incredibly conscientious. I scored a fat 0.

Lastly, high agreeableness seems to match the myth that people with non-parallel faces are better comedians. Hrrm.

[Nunki]

I looked at the men, since I'm attracted to males, and determined that the most attractive Big Five type to me is whatever you call:

High Agreeableness
Low Conscientiousness
High Extraversion
High Emotional Stability
Low Openness

[maniac]

i found attractive in men: high agreeableness, low conscientiousness, high extraversion, low emotional stability (shocker), low openness
the only women i found somewhat attractive were the high extroversion and high conscientiousness ones.

[Aylen]

I don't find these composites attractive but I know what I prefer (mostly).

50-80% openness
60-80% extroversion
35-55% agreeableness
40-70% conscientiousness
25-55% neuroticism

These are ranges I think I can reasonably deal with if I am living with the person.

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

Open-ness..... hmm not sure. On paper I would like High Open ness a lot better, irl I am probably drawn more to people with Low. Not really sure though.

Conscientiousness.... More into people that are chillax/spur of the moment and don't plan so much. As long as it doesn't go too overboard. The other way would feel like I was dating my mom. Ugh. I love her but YUCK.

Extroversion.... usually more into other introverts actually. Contrary to what some ppl have thought about me on this forum I don't usually trust 'life of the party' people and they are really douche-y to me and I don't really feel that compatible with them. I like affection tho.

Agreeableness... that is the cateogry where both of those descriptions sound horrible to me and I would be really turned off by both those types so somebody that is more in the middle would be great.

Neuroticism ... prefer low I guess as long as they weren't too dense. This is where I think opposites would probably attract better.

[The Reality Denialist]

This kind of asks for composites of all possible combinations. How capable of fracturing is your perception is going to be? Is it consistent among all combinations?

Anyway, one IEE classified me as kind of complex to understand what am I really about. This seems to be pretty much consensus of me. People are very perplexed of the first impressions I give and then knowing me.

[Aster]

This time when I looked at them, I sorted out low conscientiousness that I didn’t like, and high conscientiousness that I did like.


...I wonder what all this means....

[Anglas]

High agreeableness>low emotional stability > low extraversion
I find other faces unattractive

[The Reality Denialist]

based on traits:
Extroversion: I prefer introverted people in long term. It is easy to run hot headed intense interaction with extroverts but that becomes a problem later on.
Agreeableness: I have no clear opinion. No extremes, please.
Conscientiousness. No clear opinion although I like if daily stuff runs smooth.
Openness: I can open up people. Some sort of suggestibility.
Emotional stability: I have seen extremely neurotic people, please no. Extremely low: no thanks.

[cry]

Lol...



Low Agreeableness
Low Conscientiousness
Low Extraversion
Low Emotional Stability
High Openness

[The Reality Denialist]

Lol...



Low Agreeableness
Low Conscientiousness
Low Extraversion
Low Emotional Stability
High Openness

and mate of your choice is... grumpy impulsive ILI

[Number 9 large]

and mate of your choice is... grumpy impulsive ILI

ILI r probs one of the most conscientious types

[The Reality Denialist]

ILI r probs one of the most conscientious types

Yes but mainly in their devotion. They can totally disregard things that are not important to them. Just see Donald Triplett. Was he exceptionally good citizen without assistance in practical matters like schooling?

[Number 9 large]

Yes but mainly in their devotion. They can totally disregard things that are not important to them. Just see Donald Triplett. Was he exceptionally good citizen without assistance in practical matters like schooling?

Donald triplettt is ILE dumbass

Or at LEAST LII

[thegreenfaerie]

I like the 1st one best, upper left, for men. Who dat?

I consistently score-
O- Extremely high
C- Low end, though not extremely so, around 40, it always says "low" though, not average, rip
E- Usually low end, though not extremely so, usually between 30 and 40, one time I got 42 and was told to be "average", I recall I was feeling more social at this point in my life too
A- Upper low to average, usually about 50, often says low or average I believe. I find this one interesting for myself considering I'm INFP in MBTI. May give IEI as a typing for myself more weight
N- High

But yes, who is #1?

[thegreenfaerie]

I like the last dude too, 2nd choice/immediate draw. So first person I like is high agreeableness and 2nd person I like is low openness, lol interesting. I do not share either of these traits myself (see above post for my big 5).

Interesting. Now I want to see the post on Big 5 correlations and Socionics type Perhaps this supports the dual theory after all

[Protozoa]

Liked

High conscientiousness
High openness

[Sah Kel Plaisir]

I'm attracted to :


High Openess
High Consciousness
High Agreableness
Low Emotional Stability
Low Extraversion

Still unsure about my type but I'm leaning towards ILE/IEI/SEI . In Big Five I score RLUXX tho (with a huge preference for unstructured)
If RLOAI is INFJ that would suggest ILE ?

[Cataclysm]

None

[The Reality Denialist]

This is so weird test. This time only extroversion was low.

[one]

I like the high agreeableness and low conscientiousness.

On a random note, I know a guy who is a lot like that high agreeableness guy and he isn't very agreeable. Even the first time we talked we debated immediately. But I like that guy.

[MissDucki]

High agreeableness
High extroversion
High open-ness

So….So I start looking for IEE now or?

[RBRS]

High agreeableness, high openness.

[serenaeva]

High Conscientiousness, High Extraversion.. not surprising (:

[qaz00]

High Agreeableness > High Openness = Low Conscientiousness

[anotherguy]

High emotional stability, High openness, Low agreeableness, in that order. Do the last two even make sense together?

[Varu]

Low extroversion, low emotional stability, low consciousness, high agreeableness, high openness.

[Djinn]

(with attractiveness priority ranking 1-5 most-least)

Women:
Low Agreeableness 1
High Conscientiousness 3
High Extraversion 2
High Emotional Stability 5
High Openness 4

Men:
High Agreeableness 4
Low Conscientiousness 5
High Extraversion 3
High Emotional Stability 1
High Openness 2


It’s super interesting how attraction to agreeableness and conscientious swaps between the sexes for me. I am also generally far more attracted to women than men, and what I find attractive in women seems to compliment my personality much better. Perhaps there is some correlation in there? I also apparently find low openness the most repulsive.

I wonder where I am most likely to find women with those traits?



(with prominence ranking 1-5 most-least)

My personal Big 5 scores:
Neutral Agreeableness 5
Low Conscientiousness 3
Low Extraversion 2
Low Emotional Stability 4
High Openness 1

[InkBlue]

|Women 1b 2a 3a 4b 5a
|Low agreeableness
|High conscientiousness
|High extraversion
|Low emotional stability
|High openness

|Men 1a 2b 3b 4a 5a
|High agreeableness
|Low conscientiousness
|Low extraversion
|High emotional stability
|High openness

|I am RLUAI

[Biscuit]

Women:

High Agreeableness

Low Consciousness

High extraversion

Low openness to experience

Low emotional stability

Men

Low Agreeableness

High Consciousness

Low extraversion

Low openness to experience

Both in emotional stability

My Big 5 test results: RLUEN

[pasleine]

all these very similar faces make my brain hurt lol >_<
comparing the two scales though i seemed to prefer... RLOEI
which i can personally vouch for i guess. i like people who are put together but still lonely, independent. i don't understand people who are highly emotionally stable, i like looking at and working through problems more than i like enjoying life
i very much match for a "typical day" than i do based on who is the "hottest"

[Xaiviay]

The most immoral/destructive and fucked up dudes were the hottest to me. Figures.

Lol, or maybe you're just seeking very high levels of ;p

^ lol

I liked low conscientiousness and low openness in male.

Interesting, kinda has the laid-back and sleepy-eyed look of SLIs?

High Conscientiousness and Low Agreeableness were the two that immediately stood out to me.

Neat! We preferred opposites

[NAWTEASE]

lol not sure
Another study says S and N wouldn’t be the best practical match:
http://www.capt.org/jpt/pdfFiles/Mar...l_36_16_27.pdf

[Xaiviay]

lol not sure
Another study says S and N wouldn’t be the best practical match:
http://www.capt.org/jpt/pdfFiles/Mar...l_36_16_27.pdf

In my experience, I wouldn't have it any other way. My Si loves me some Ne Also, Si provides practicality, which Ne tends to lack.

But, to each their own of course.

[Xaiviay]

I like authoritative types. Perhaps there is a correlation.

Looking at the images again, my least favorites are High Agreeableness and Low ES.
The women mostly look identical to me.

Yeah, that seems to make sense. Strong leadership qualities do not correlate with high agreeableness or low emotional stability.

Only standout: Low emotional stability

Well... checks out with my Dual...

What type is your dual? If you don't mind telling.

[NAWTEASE]

I read that strong leadership correlates with extroversion

[Xaiviay]

I read that strong leadership correlates with extroversion

Yeah, I think I've read that somewhere too. It would make sense. It's easier to lead a group of people, if you're not as drained or overwhelmed by all the interpersonal interaction xD

[Adam Strange]

@Myst Do you have public pics?

Myst's pictures tend to melt the servers they appear on.

[WinnieW]

Myst's pictures tend to melt the servers they appear on.

Surely... and you need that special water-cooled camera to take pictures of Myst, normaly in use to take pictures of the sun.

...and be sure to wear the proper dress if you want to date Myst.


SCNR, Adam. Sorry, Myst.