Damn, can't I choose them all?
And Add:
Ishtar, Inanna, Lilith...
Damn, can't I choose them all?
And Add:
Ishtar, Inanna, Lilith...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Choose me.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
If hell is just a state of mind, not an actual place, then let's have the Pope come out and acknowledge that. Let's have preachers stop teaching children that hell is real and they all may be going there.
If hell is a state of mind, we can all forget about it... right?
I understand you are backed into a corner. But smearing me now, living in the past tense just to pretend you were right... it changes nothing.
It's the dogma that needs to die... not the myths. Spiritual knowledge will only enhance faith.
What?... You think I made those facts up, and wiki is lying about them too?
I posted a video above of a Lion ripping apart a baby buffalos neck. Well I've also seen a video of a Leopard carrying an orphaned baby hippo up a tree and nursing it.... Don't talk about the 'real world' with such irreverence.
Last edited by rat1; 02-14-2014 at 11:17 PM.
I am going to go with all goddesses for now. Even the ones that no longer benefit me. They are powerful and beautiful.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
you get a like just for the song choice.
I can be a prick but I know there's light at the end of this
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Get started then
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Lilith describes you so well. ...you are Lilith.
I read a bit about Lilith. She is supposed be brided with Samael after Eve rejected her.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samael
According to Zoharistic cabala, Samael was also mated with Eisheth Zenunim, Na'amah, and Agrat Bat Mahlat—all angels of sacred prostitution.
You say you know who I am.
Do you really know me?
I am always questioning... who am I really? Can I really be who I really am?
I'm trying to find a poem on him as beautiful as the one you found for Lilith. Where did you find that poem?
In the Talmud:
The Talmud states that Satan and Samael the Angel of Death, are the same, and Samael is also there made equivalent to the Biblical serpent of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.... In conjunction with Lilith, who was one of his wives (see Lilith’s blog), he is represented as the Evil Beast.
I found it here.. don't judge me...
http://succubuspoetry.weebly.com/
"Wildcats shall meet with hyenas;
goat-demons shall call to each other.
There too Lilith shall repose,
and find a place to rest."
Isaiah 34:14
I will pm you some sites.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Why would I?
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
^ that's goddess energy. smfh
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What Goddess?
^I know Maritsa.
Like I said, Satan as a reference to a counter to God and his creation is introduced to the Christians as they and Jews were exposed to the religions of the Romans during the occupation of Jerusalem. It doesn't matter the Christians probably borrowed the "dark" feeling of this counter existence as it accompanies some of their fears and outlooks of the time and literature reflected strict adherence or else because Romans themselves were warriors in so many ways. This isn't meant to be taken literally but in heart as a symbol of what might become or befall if people don't listen. Anyway, it's no reason to persecute people today.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I would say, Lilith, Aphrodite/Venus and others but we will go with Lilith.
http://www.lilithinstitute.com/creations/liturgy.html
Edit: we need a mythology thread
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yeah and I need to buy a comprehensive book on mythology.
And my 'pure awareness' is suppressed. I can't express myself to my full potential. I just want to bring this society down. Become a drug dealer. Live or die, who cares?
I saw it while reading your chart. I didn't know he said that. I have one of his books but never read it. I am actually trying to read "a course in miracles" again, at the suggestion of someone who is reading it right now. She wants me to do the 365 day thing from the book.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Ah.
I'm gona write something in my blog about astrology before I sleep.
No but they aren't expensive if you've got good stuff.
@rat1, believe it or not Wikipedia is not a source which is worthy to be referred to. It has some good articles, but is also full of mistakes and half-knowledge.
So, as long as you don't provide a primary source for your hypothesis for the parallels between the New Testament and astrology, some ancient text about what people knew about the stars and so on, you're statement is completely irrelevant.
Anyone who is a little bit interested in esoteric stuff and the occult and has issues with the christian faith could fake something like that. I'm just being realistic here.
I mean, how come I find the stuff only on pages with a clear esoteric background and the pages I googled didn't provide any references to primary sources either?
Just to make it clear, what I mean, something from Wiki for you: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_source
Love is like an energy, rushing in, rushing inside of me...
Yeah.... I knew you'd say as much @kadda1212. I wrote this earlier for you, and saved it in a notepad file.
I cited probably.... 10 or so wiki pages referencing mostly stars & constellations in my astrotheology bit, wouldn't you say?
The first point I made was about Aries the lamb. Let's have a look at how much evidence exists for Aries being symbolized by fire, the Ram & Lamb, & being the first sign.
I assure you I can compile just as much evidence for everything else I cited, but we will focus on this for now.
...I don't know if you're aware that a lamb, a sheep, and a ram are all the same animal.
Definition of Lamb:
lamb
noun
1. a young sheep.
Definition of Ram:
ram
noun
1. an uncastrated male sheep.
Definition of sheep: ... sheep.
(Jesus is the sheep, God is the shepherd)
the Rig-Veda mentioning Aries as a Ram (~2000 BC)
https://www.google.com/#q=aries+ram+rig+veda
"The ram (avi, also called mesha in the Vedas) is Aries."
Here is the first google result for 'aries', a western astrology site talking about aries the ram, and being the 1st zodiac sign:
http://www.astrology.com/aries-sun-s...ns/2-d-d-66918
http://biblehub.com/hebrew/2924.htm
In Hebrew, Aries is called "Taleh" and means "the Lamb".
http://biblenumbers.files.wordpress....-the-heart.pdf Great link. I recommend reading the whole thing
"The Hebrew name for the sign is ‘Taleh’: “the lamb”.
The bright star in the head is ‘El Natik’: “slain” which
the Arabs called ‘Hamal’: “sheep”."
Jesus, the lamb, is slain.
http://www.livekabbalah.org/index.ph...h/nisan-aries/
"The Torah says, on the tenth of Nisan (month when sun is in Aries), as a symbolic act of control, the Hebrews took a lamb (Aries) and tied it to their homes. Then, on the twilight of the 15th day they slautered it and roasted it on the fire."
Another great link worth the full read.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aries_(constellation)
"Aries has three prominent stars forming an asterism, designated Alpha, Beta, and Gamma Arietis by Johann Bayer. All three are commonly used for navigation.[27] There is also one other star above the fourth magnitude, 41 Arietis. α Arietis, called Hamal, is the brightest star in Aries. Its traditional name is derived from the Arabic word for "lamb" or "head of the ram" (ras al-hamal), which references Aries's mythological background.[18] With a spectral class of K2[13] and a luminosity class of III, it is an orange giant with an apparent visual magnitude of 2.00, which lies 66 light-years from Earth.[12][28] Hamal has a luminosity of 96 L☉ and its absolute magnitude is −0.1.[29]"
More evidence Aries is known as the most firey sign symbolized by Rams:
http://www.tarot.com/astrology/zodiac/aries
http://www.mazzaroth.com/InsertFive/AriesStarChart.htm
"Others call Aries ‘The Lamb,' although it is a Ram-like creature comparable to the Capricornus Goat-like creature giving rise to a fish. In the New Testament the Greek word for Lamb is very similar to the word Aries, look at them for yourself.
1) Aren, ar-ane’, a noun the nominative case of which is found only in early times, occurs in Luke 10:3. It is perhaps the same as Arrhen, ar’-hrane, or Arsen, ar’-sane probably from airo, male (as stronger for lifting); a lamb (as a male).
I'm really just citing bits and pieces of the links. Flip through them yourself if you want evidence. There's a sea of evidence for it.
Last edited by rat1; 02-15-2014 at 06:35 AM.
I like this site for a different perspective and it does reference ancient sources.
http://www.thedyinggod.com/
I suppose the term ancient is relative though.Though astrology has often been regarded as representing an ancient form of knowledge devised by the Babylonians, scholars have now determined that its development was impossible, before the eighth century BC, due to the absence of a reliable system of chronology, and that, more properly, astrology was a product of the sixth century BC. This transformation, according to Bartel van der Waerden, was the result of the influence of Zoroastrianism, with its doctrine that the human soul originated in the stars.
In addition, the sixth century BC is also known in Jewish history as the Exile, when their entire population was located in the city, having been removed to there by Nebuchadnezzar, at the beginning of the century, after he had destroyed Jerusalem. Having become substantial citizens, with some achieving minor administrative posts, it is possible the Jews also contributed to this development. In fact, in the Book of Daniel, Chapter 2:48, Daniel is made chief of the "wise men" of Babylon, that is of the Magi or Chaldeans. In any case, scholars have certainly recognized that the later teachings referred to collectively as the esoteric Kabbalah, seem to have been a combination of Magian and Chaldean lore.
Astrology was not a component of mainstream Zoroastrianism, and those who incorporated its concepts into their version of the faith seem to have been regarded as heretical. As Edwin Yamauchi describes, "the relationship of the Magi to Zoroaster and his teachings is a complex and controversial issue." Ever since the early days of the Persian Empire, there had existed an antagonism with the proponents of true Zoroastrianism and the Magi. And, according the French Assyriologist Lenormant, "to their influence are to be ascribed nearly all the changes which, towards the end of the Achaemenid dynasty, corrupted deeply the Zoroastrian faith, so that it passed into idolatry."
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Astrology and Religion Among the Greeks and Romans Paperback – Facsimile, September 17, 1994
by Franz Cumont (Author)
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Some others belief in the civilization Atlantis. There is are some strange structures buried in the ocean suggesting a sunken civilization around its alleged area...
The most ancient astrology I know of came from Egypt and migrated into India. If you know of an earlier version I'd love to read about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_astrology
Among Indo-European peoples, astrology has been dated to the 3rd millennium BC, with roots in calendrical systems used to predict seasonal shifts and to interpret celestial cycles as signs of divine communications.[1]
Astrology, in its broadest sense, is the search for human meaning in the sky. It has been argued that astrology began as a study as soon as human beings made conscious attempts to measure, record, and predict seasonal changes by reference to astronomical cycles.[4]
Early evidence of such practices appears as markings on bones and cave walls, which show that lunar cycles were being noted as early as 25,000 years ago; the first step towards recording the Moon’s influence upon tides and rivers, and towards organizing a communal calendar.
Indian astrology:
The ancient science of astrology can be traced to the Vedas around 5000 BCE. The Vedas are among the world’s most ancient and sacred scriptures. The word Veda means knowledge coming from the root vid, to know. The Vedas are books of knowledge said to be the fundamental doctrine of Hinduism. The Vedas were received by the great sages through divine revelation, referred to as sruti and recorded for the benefit of humanity.
The Vedas are divided into four books: the Rig-Veda, the Yajur-Veda, the Sama-Veda and the Atharva-Veda. According to Vedic astrologer and historian David Frawley, one of the first references to astrology dates back to the Rig Veda, the oldest of the scriptures. It records a description of the chakra or wheel of 360 degrees placed in the sky by Rishi Dirghatamas, pandit to one of the greatest kings of India, Bharata, the original name of India.
The Christians burned almost every ancient Egyptian document they could find and I'm not sure how far back their astrology dates, but parallels seems to suggest it migrated to india from egypt.
Last edited by rat1; 02-15-2014 at 06:21 AM.
I will create an ftp account for you so you can look through what I have. I will do it when my family leaves. They should be here tomorrow.
Edit: I have a stuff on Atlantis and Lemuria, as well
Edit again: I should really wait and put this in another thread I am planning but, anyway. grain of salt.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/at..._lemuria_8.htm
Last edited by Aylen; 02-15-2014 at 07:19 AM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Meh fuck m y blog. I'm slipping away into sleep
Here are some pics I took of the moon tonight. It looked very strange and the pics are not filtered that is pretty much how it looked except it was much clearer and the light you see around it was orange. I don't know why it looks like this tonight but maybe someone will.
I wasn't going to post them but whatever. Someone logical can explain it.
http://s318.photobucket.com/user/joy...moon%20goddess
It is making me act strange.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
tonight is a full moon. ; )
Full moons are supposed to cause confusion, chaos, emotionally expressive, manipulative, fulfillment of wants and needs..
you were born on full moon ; D
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
it feels unstable and impulsive. The emotions just flow out. Not much limitation
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
yeah it's fun
instigator (the moon)
Last edited by Aylen; 02-15-2014 at 08:01 AM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung