I don't think he is
leading because whenever he does break down and start crying it prompts millions of people in the world to basically think, "fucking hell, stop crying". We can't sympathize with him because it looks like (and is, although not to him) an overreaction.
Although I'm sure he is not that way in real life his emotions seem to range only from slightly annoyed to very annoyed and despair. People dislike him for that more than anything else, I think.
An "only-me-first" attitude is usually an asset in the sporting world eg. John McEnroe (could he be
leading?).
An
person has a wide range of emotions that he/she wears very plainly and very naturally. They are, initially anyway, popular and charismatic because their emotions can readily be seen and we can quickly relate to them (that's my theory). That and having ethics in their ego block (is that right?) means that they better understand what motivates us, what makes us hate, fear and love, what makes us feel envious or jealous (
) or what makes us rage or cry or feel joy
. This would apply for any ethical type over a logical one.
An example of who I think is
leading would be Gabriel Batistuta. I've made another thread about him and he has some strong
going in almost every single picture (not just my pics but pics on Google as well). He is usually wearing a big smile or a big frown or he's shouting at something (I know, he just scored, so what?). He has very few pictures where he expressionless unlike Andrea Pirlo who usually looks like this:
I'm pretty sure Batistuta is an ese because he looks almost exactly like someone I know for a fact is an ese. On a different note however, it would appear according to wiki that Mr. Batistuta has some interest in coaching the Australian national team.