Second, I was referring to Dimensionality of functions. Now, while I would hesitate to adopt the Bukalov view exactly as written here:
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...Dimensionality I would say that there are 4 levels of strength or competence that a person can have in any IM element depending on what function it serves in that person's model. I would at least say that 1D is incompetence where the person is unable to perform except at the most rudimentary level with a severe drain of energy, 2D is wavering competence where the person can achieve a workability with practice, 3D is mastery where the person can quickly apply the IM Element with ease and 4D is fundamental where the IM Element has a strong and clear presence in how a person comes across to others (decides what their Communication and Movement Styles are).
Third, I was referring to Movement Style. This is my own creation in response to Gulenko's Communication style where he described how having 4D (leading or demonstrative) rational IM elements decides how one communicates with Te 4D being the Business Like Communicators, Fe being Passionate, Fi being Sincere and Ti being Cold Blooded. I did the same for the Irrational IM Elements, forming Movement Styles where people move and hold themselves differently depending on whether Se, Ne, Si or Ni is 4D... Se 4D being Tough, Si being Controlled, Ne being Clumsy and Ni being Delicate.
I hope that clears things up.