EIE, I think, the subtype that gives you the look to make a point as if they like the reaction they cause with it. I think it was Fe. Easily recognizable when they are professors and in front of a class.
EIE, I think, the subtype that gives you the look to make a point as if they like the reaction they cause with it. I think it was Fe. Easily recognizable when they are professors and in front of a class.
Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.
LSE is a final typing from me
He likes to make people laugh and he enjoys the outdoors.
His wife is EII
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This guy, who looks like a copy of barack obama, got typed as IEI by Jack from WSS, which I agree with.
Barack Obama is an IEI with a dominant subtype. Michelle is imo also an IEI.
ESE
Obama is LIE
Last edited by hellohellohello; 11-05-2023 at 12:53 AM.
Very alpha but I have no idea which type.
I’ve retyped Barack and Michelle as duals Barack is LSE and Michelle is EII
They are so much like my own relationship
https://youtube.com/shorts/DnNLd0j6t...Rt4muAG5CSHlnB
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html