-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think IEI with their ability and affinity to observe event in time are able to sense the imminence of events like "you will go to jail if you don't pay your bill" as in that event is seen and it will happen. Do you make forecast of event like this nature?
You're ENFp just own it
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
+1 to EII for the current avatar
I want video
If you find yourself especially drawn to guys w lots of Se and Fe, you're probably not IEE. I dated SLE and SEE guys, and it can be fun, but it was totally different -- and much less "natural" than w SLIs. To make it work either I had to change a bit or the guys did, whereas w SLIs we fit like puzzle pieces just being ourselves. Also, of course SLI guys aren't exactly giving off lots of Fe, which would probably calm and/or intrigue you if you're IEE but annoy and/or frustrate you if you're IEI.
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Without video it's hard to be sure in the type.
Photos give suspicion to EII. What and how she writes on the forum leaves EII among possible also.
She has no hysterics and Te-ingorance of Fe types. She writes reasonable things with adequate emotions. She looks as clear N type on photos. And I doubt in ENFP.
She doesn't come off personable, interested in relationships and has friends who rely on emotional support who can come to her and talk to her about their problems. Clearly you must see how she doesn't value Fi even if you can't see it like that she has no care for Te regimented approach to things. What you are seeing is her demonstrating Fi in describing her personal experiences with family that doesn't make her Fi. She doesn't judge the norms and morals, and actions of others that defy proper relationship behavior of others as I do
@summerprincess am I correct? Have I understood you well?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Originally Posted by Originally Posted by Maritsa@Sol this is her response to Ni in this thread that says very clearly that she values Ni. Now you just need to ask her if she would pressure you to get things done on timeOriginally Posted by summerprincess
IEI look deceptively similar to EII except EII don't smile as much
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 07-19-2016 at 10:19 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't really know what you mean. It is true that I'm not very personable but I am interested in relationships and what makes people tick; that's why I'm interested in socionics and mbti. I definitely judge norms and morals, but everybody does in some way imo. I don't have very many set moral grounds that I wouldn't consider changing, at least in the back of my head. I try to see everyone's viewpoint and be objective about morals and ethics, because I want to be correct and understand motivations. I still have my own firm opinions though as well...but if I am being truthful to myself, I don't hold any opinion 100%. I wish I could.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I love when Maritsa and Sol fight
another +1 to EII
To better understand other people by using of Socionics you need correctly understand own type. There is basis to think it's not IEI as you are thinking now.
Also with incorrect own typing you may to make wrong decisions for yourself and other people.
To check is your type IEI or EII/IEE is simply by impressions from people of beta and delta types. Which ones are more soully closer to you, which you feel more psychologically comfortly. Then either you'll be more sure in IEI or will tend to review your type.
I fight with arguments. With Maritsa I prefer joking in the last time, as it's hard to take her seriously or to try change something in her strange "vision".
One such impression is how flexible and changeable she is which you want to ignore. Why? I am not this indecisive. Ij temperament is different from Ip but you want to ignore that. And I keep saying that IEI are visually deceptively similar to EII and ignore this fact as well. One of these days sol you will start seeing these visions too. If you practice long enough.
We are doing Aylen's story all over again. I say IEI and you say no no matter how many examples of dissimilarity that I try to show you and how many ways I try to show people how they can get a person's type by asking questions and then reading the response.
If you really want or need a video from which it was very clear to me that you could not type all the time that I hope that she gives that to you but in the meantime please read people's responses.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This is not what EII are interested in Socionics
Not just Fi base type do this. Also those who demonstrate FiI definitely judge norms and morals, but everybody does in some way imo.
This shows flexibility would you agree?I don't have very many set moral grounds that I wouldn't consider changing, at least in the back of my head.
I try to see everyone's viewpoint and be objective about morals and ethics, because I want to be correct and understand motivations. I still have my own firm opinions though as well...but if I am being truthful to myself,Moral objectivity is Fe because moral subjective is Fi. EII don't care much about motives of others. This shows flexibility rather than understanding. Would you please write about your perception on Ni and how you use it as a base function?I don't hold any opinion 100%. I wish I could.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
temperament difference
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...le=Temperament
IP temperament
The IP temperament, or receptive-adaptive temperament, was identified by Viktor Gulenko and includes the four irrational introverts (one in each quadra): IEI, SEI, ILI, and SLI. Each of these types is also dynamic.
Typical characteristics
relaxed
go-with-the-flow
finds it easy to spend long periods of time in no activity, or at very low levels of energy
movements are flexible, unhurried
little inclination towards fidgetiness when having to remain inactive for longer periods
IPs are both dynamic and irrational, so they see reality as in continuous, gradual, often imperceptible change. An IP is soothed by this, seeing reality through his leading function. This leads to a relaxed inclination to take things as they come and adapt to them.
As introverts, IPs tend to be relaxed and somewhat passive about initiating relationships with other people, mostly assuming that others will take the initiative.
IJ temperament
The IJ temperament, or balanced-stable temperament, was identified by Viktor Gulenko and includes the four rational introverts (one in each quadra): LII, LSI, ESI, and EII. Each of these types is also static.
Typical characteristics
calm, balanced and inert
"unflappable"
rigid but not very fast gait
may appear passive-aggressive
usually very stable mood
more reactive than active
little inclination to fidget during long periods of inactivity
IJs are both static and rational, so they see reality as mostly not changing and when it does, it's in abrupt "leaps" from one state to another. An IJ draws inner stability from a stable reality, especially as seen through his leading function. That makes him confident that things will probably remain as they are despite what he sees as minor disturbances; periods of clear upheaval are very disturbing and the individual is anxious that things will "settle down" one way or the other soon enough.
As introverts, IJs tend to be calm and relaxed about initiating relationships with other people, mostly assuming that others will take the initiative, but will be more inclined to try to make sure a relationship is maintained once established.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Fwiw i think we can all agree on that Maritsa is not EII.
I think summerprincess looks Fi ego in her picture rather than Fe ego. But its just speculation since you cant determine ones type just by a picture.
@Sol
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The first thing I assume about myself is that I'm Beta because I dislike authority figures (simultaneously respecting them often) and I'm distrustful of people who pretend to be gurus and experts, also my taste for the macabre and for horror. I also have a sense of humor that some easily offended people could find more ..offensive. Those are the people I imagine some deltas to be, especially on the internet lol. I'm naturally rebellious even if I appear calm. Taking into account Dichotomies, I am HIGHLY aristocratic. I always identified more with Beta but I made this thread bc I thought perhaps I have just convinced myself I'm IEI when I'm not.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Beta has Ti value and hence likes subordination with its authority figures. Beta is the most authoritarian quadra, as besides liking of formal statuses, it prefers unification (no Ne valued). The examples of beta at power are very centralized states like Hithler's (EIE) Germany, Stalin's (LSI) USSR. Or reforms of George Bush-jr (EIE) in USA, - when civil freedom and rights were excessively supressed under pretence of "terrorism threat". Style of Beta is charismatic dictatorship, no pluralism, total unification, - very centralized societies.
Irrational idealization of "gurus" is Fe/Ti value.I'm distrustful of people who pretend to be gurus and experts
For example being from delta, I mostly respect objectivity and own experience. Not personal charisma (Fe) or formal statuses (Ti).
It's the main reason why I create own list with types examples. And after initial gathering of opinions about own type then spent a year for researching the typology to choose own type based on IR with own typings. I don't like blind trust to gurus, their new theories without proof and don't hide speculative state of today typing methods.
You conversation style is softer and more reasonable than hysterics of EIE and IEI I saw in forums.I also have a sense of humor that some easily offended people could find more ..offensive.
You may look at examples of beta and delta, and decide which ones are spiritually closer to you. Without intertype relations it's easy to mistake. Besides bloggers I may pm you actors, as I've significantly updated their list in Internet.I always identified more with Beta
You say like there is someone which has real (when both sides did not know external opinions beforhand) match with you or with someone you think as not "horrible typer" higher than 50%, at least. There is no such, so everybody looks as bad typer, except cases of your conformism with him.
From theoretical side I use classical Jung's and Socionics theory, unlike someones which evidently use bs like Reinin's stuff, subtypes, etc. Also I have not lesser than average typing match with others based on bloggers experiment on socioforum.
So your assertion is objectively baseless. It's mostly caused by your wish to be IEI and my doubts in this type for you.
@Sol what do you think Starfall is?
she respects authorities like Maritsa
her forum's talking leaves place for T type. photos were in "Unofficial Members Picture Thread" and there was nothing from INFP.
without video I'm not sure, but doubt. also unlike Aylen (real INFP), she says that strongly disagrees with my INFP examples, what rises the possibility of her wrong self-understanding
I dont think Maritsa has ever typed anyone anything different than SEE or SEI or now LSE
and yet she still is better at socionics than sol