Biased? Can't be objective? Embrace it!

[griggerplease]

1. Choose one of the tests:

http://www.socionics.com/sta/sta_turbo.html

4 questions

Instructions:

* Answer according to what you wanna look like (look-a-like). Count points if it is a difficult question to answer.

2a. You are the type opposing your result in this table (Look-a-like relations):

ENTp - ESTp
ISFp - INFp
ESFj - ESTj
INTj - INFj
ENFj - ENTj
ISTj - ISFj
ESFp - ENFp
INTp - ISTp


http://www.socionics.com/sta/sta_turbo_xl.html

54 questions

Instructions:

* Answer according to what you wanna look like (look-a-like)

* Utilize the unsure button when you are unsure due to a difficult question to answer philosophically, if you get too many Xs then my method wont work for you on this test.

2b. You are the type opposing your result in this table (Look-a-like relations):

ENTp - ESTp
ISFp - INFp
ESFj - ESTj
INTj - INFj
ENFj - ENTj
ISTj - ISFj
ESFp - ENFp
INTp - ISTp

My answers:





My result:


Why this method works:
"Business relations (also known as look-alike relations) are similar to identity and kindred in that partners have half their functions in common — in this case, all the even-numbered ones ("Producing functions 'come second' and are even-numbered: 2, 4, 6, and 8")."
Sources:
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Business
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p..._and_producing

Which means that what we want to look like is a product of an incomplete (half) perception of reality. The other half is what we actually are but can't perceive, (and in an "normal" individual what we want to look like):



"Aushra Augusta suggested that accepting functions focus on obtaining a picture of reality, and producing functions create some sort of 'new' product that is molded to that cross-cut of reality obtained by the accepting function."
Source:
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p..._and_producing Content 2

This means that my method lets you produces a result that is going to when calculated with my algorithm (Look-a-like relations) give you your actual type.

Recommended descriptions/portraits:

ENTp
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ISFp
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ESFj
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
INTj
http://personalitycafe.com/blogs/lan...written-12277/

ENFj
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ISTj
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ESTp
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
INFp
http://personalitycafe.com/infp-arti...r-written.html

ESFp
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
INTp
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ENTj
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ISFj
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html

ESTj
http://personalitycafe.com/logical-s...r-written-112/
INFj
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ENFp
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html
ISTp
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics...r-written.html

Edit:
Foundation for this thread:
http://www.socionics.com/forums/show...5760#post25760