Mountain Dew's Type

[Creepy-Snaps]

after finally watching the video and seeing your irl demeanor, i might actually consider LSE. i'm leaning ESE>LSE. i don't think i could ever see SLE, tbh. i could substantiate my hunch with things that you said in the video but it wouldn't be entirely honest because what most influenced my opinion is your general vibe and how certain little things you said remind me of others i've types xSE and things like that. so i'm sure this is somewhat meaningless to you, lol, but fwiw since you made this thread hah.

Didn't you / don't you self-type as INFj? What's with everyone typing me as their dual?

For the record, your post is not meaningless to me, quite the contrary. This thread is open indefinitely. Nothing in socionics is 100%. Although I still believe SLE-Se fits best right now, that's subject to change, as new information is added, as you guys make more observations about me.

LSE, I'm thinking. My reasoning may seem poor, though, but it's basically the 'feel' I'm getting.

initial post:

I think you are LSE-Si. I don't see irrationality. The opening of the vid was immediately Si and something Si creatives might apologize for (greasy hair and clarifying things like that). The thing about laziness and trash by the trash can is very reminiscent of the LSEs I know who hate it when people don't make that extra effort. The thing about death and planning and not thinking that long term is also very similar to the general way LSEs think about things.

You seem too...I dunno...you don't seem SLE to me. You do seem very active, though, in accomplishing things of real worth. I know my LSE dad is all about doing and doing what derives real value.

I guess it depends what you think what Se leading means and why you think you are SLE versus LSE. But in my limited view, you are more likely LSE.

What's your self-type, aixelsyd? ESFp, like in your signature? You know, just so I can eliminate any possibly biased reasoning.

Aw. You have a big heart. =)

You're a really nice guy. I think you are an estp. Esp. with how angry and emotional you get when people are rude to others.

(ps: No FWIW, I don't have a crush on him and I don't wanna be gay with him. I just think he's estp okay?)

Thanks for your opinion. Although, overall, the getting angry at people who are rude, I still see fits Se and being protective more... one big reason being, I'm rude to others who need to be put in their place... and see aggression as a means to an end. I'm open and considering it being a form of ethics... much strongly Fe>Fi, of course.

He prefers production in an Se sense, while overlooking Ne and devalues Te...how can he be LSE with that?

And, I have a dual or a Te radar....he's not my dual.

Your insights have been helpful. I think one huge point you made on this thread, which I've thought about... if I'm ESE, how can I be so darned good at analysis? Not to toot my own horn, but I was a Finance major in university, excelled way ahead of others in all my classes, love tactics/thinking on the fly in video games, especially, love chess, analyzing new problems, etc., and as you pointed out in private messages, my Ti comes across very strongly on lots of my posts here on the forums.

Not saying all that isn't impossible as an ESE, but does seem a bit out of character. And I don't really talk about business/math/etc. on the forums here a lot, so I think those strengths of mine get lost, when others try to type me.

Again, you care about your own point of view rather than listening to me. IDK I'm not talking to you any more. This is WAY too exhausting for me. Conflict relations don't exhaust me as much as you do.

You've said that many times before, and yet you keep coming back and talking with me. It's almost like you're attracted to me, drawn to me, unable to stop with me. (by the way: )

ok, observations on your video:

-You're a pretty chill person in general, but you can be uncompromising when it comes to certain basic values or expectations of people.
-You like to stay busy. This is a huge thing with ESEs.
-You are comfortable interacting with and commenting on your physical environment. In fact this is just about the first thing you say on the video, unprompted!
-You give a lot of thought to people and your relationships with them. You have a streak of self-sacrifice.
-You make no mention of socionic categories whatsoever.

1) Agreed. Can still fit SLE though.
2) "
3) Agreed. However, both you and aixelsyd seem to think that's Si, and I'll get to that in a sec, and in my next post.
4) Not sure. I do give a fair amount of thought towards relationships, but not sure if this is natural, or a by-product of my environment. My parents divorced when I was 10. I've had lots of turmoil with relationships in my life, and that's sort of forced me to give a lot of thought about things, which I may not have normally done.
5) To be completely honest, it's hard for me to not talk about socionics categories and say what I think things are. I tried really hard, in that video, to not mention anything, so I wouldn't bias people's judgments.

And, ironically, in trying really hard to not bias people's judgments, I accidentally acted unlike my normal self, and ended up biasing people's judgments anyway.

The opening of the vid was immediately Si and something Si creatives might apologize for (greasy hair and clarifying things like that).

This post is getting long enough, so I want to address a lot of the specific socionics things, and my reasoning, in a completely separate post.