Joel Sartore - Si-ESE? - potentially a rare example of an ESE male
Joel Sartore - Si-ESE? - potentially a rare example of an ESE male
Cat Stevens, now Yusuf Islam - SEI Fe subtype.
https://www.google.ca/search?q=cat+s...&bih=559&dpr=2Yusuf Islam (born Steven Demetre Georgiou, 21 July 1948), commonly known by his former stage name Cat Stevens, is a British singer-songwriter and multi-instrumentalist.[1] His 1967 debut album reached the top 10 in the UK, and the album's title song "Mathew and Son" charted at number 2 on the UK Singles Chart. His albums Tea for the Tillerman (1970) and Teaser and Firecat( 1971) were both certified triple platinum in the US by the RIAA. His musical style consists of folk, pop, rock, and Islamic music.
Agreed. This is probably one of the most caregiverish songs I've heard:
On the Nature of Things: An Alpha Manifesto, by Lucretius
Rob Zombie - ILE 6w7? ("darksider" so/sx)
LII sp/so, 3w4 (?) 135 tritype
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Agnetha Fältskog, ESE, Fe-Dominant subtype
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Leif GW Persson, Swedish criminologist. LII Creative sub
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
LII 1w9 so/sx the soc subtype
Vanessa Van Edwards - Si-SEI 3w4 (sx/so?)
Gary Larson (LII)
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 08-18-2017 at 08:52 AM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
An ESE friend kept giving me exactly same advice on how to modify body language to influence how people treat you. It's Sensing blocked together with Ethics, which occurs in "Democratic" quadra and peaks with SFs.
There is no way that she is Si PoLR or "Aristocratic" type for that matter. Both EIE and LIE can safely be scratched off the list.
ESE could be possible, but not SEI.
Si PoLR is actually possible, since these types often bring up Si related topics, but they process it through stronger functions.
For example, EIE dance teacher can be very specific on body movements, how to hold your hands, the lightness of touch etc. To the point that ordinary people give up. One gets the feeling that the Si is very "narrow" or almost "neurotic". It has to be perfect and incorporated into the movement and time. SEIs can't follow this very well because Si is processed directly, there is no "interpreting" or "narrowing" of it.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
ESFJ
They have good chemistry! ILE-Ne, ESE-Si:
Norton describes himself as calm and boring. I see him as creative use of Fe, and not that this matters, but he doesnt annoy me like ESEs do. I could watch his show all day. ESE seem more prissy and stuck in themselves or something. Hard to describe. Not trying to be offensive, I hope you take what I say with a grain of salt.
Gentle and demure? Sometimes yes sometimes no. I make my ESE very uncomfortable numerous times when I get in a boisterous mood and I think hes being a stuck up little princess bitch. (But I still love em)
Yup, not much more to add here.
I think this mindset extends into Fe, but I do see your point and agree the causation of it. "I loved my new bike, but the seat was so uncomfortable...." Me: "yeah who cares you pussy, just ride it an enjoy". lol you catch my drift.ESEs have a very princessy mindset even though we love big with our leading Fe. I think the creative function comes off as selfish in a lot of types.
As soon as I said it I knew you were going to reply this way and tbh I have to agree the same thing I said for SEI could just as easily be said for ESE. I think because ESE are so centered all the time, they may miss in themselves how "dramatic" they come across. For example, Him: "I'm not dramatic at all..." Me: "come again?" I think subdued expressionism is a better term. Like how big and wide can your eyes go in mock surprise over the simplest of every day occurrences. Ofc I'm going to mock you for it. Maybe if I make my eyes REALLY REALLY REALLY big it will REALLY show you how fake surprised I am as a reaction and really demonstrate my CONCERN.As for Norton describing himself as boring. ESEs often think they are boring and calm. The joke is they are neither really. Well no type is boring to their own quadra or semi-dual at least.
Sorry I'm rambling now.
Emilia Clarke ESE-Fe?
o-EMILIA-CLARKE-NO-MAKEUP-facebook.jpgFilm, studio, TV, and Broadway actress. In 2010 Clarke was cast as Daenerys Targaryen in the HBO fantasy series Game of Thrones
is this singer SEI? (or ESE?)
Kendall Jenner - INTJ
Emilia Clarke - ESFP
I know the main meaning is "stupid". And that some people may use it in other senses like having illness or funny, what changes nothing as there is no way to distinguish such situations. My recommendation is to use more basic and common terms, not the ones with a lot of different senses - such non-English speakers will understand you more correctly.
Dorky has never in my entire life in Canada ever meant stupid. It has meant a dork, a poindexter, a silly nerd, childish reactions, buck teeth, glasses held together by tape, Marty Mcfly, loud laughter about things other would consider dumb or nonsensical, the entire cast of The Big Bang Theory (all smart dorks). Educate yourself comrade.
the16types.info - the largest english speaking forum on the planet.
ESFJ
Thomas Middleditch - ENTP
Lauren Southern - SEI-Fe so/sp
dude Alex - ENTP
Lauren Southern - ENFJ
Fe-ESE sx/sp the "seducer" sx subtype
Lin-Manuel Miranda SEI-Fe sub 3w2
Lin-Manuel Miranda born January 16, 1980) is an American composer, lyricist, playwright, and actor best known for creating and starring in the Broadway musicals Hamilton and Im the Heights. He co-wrote the songs for Disney's Moana Soundtrack (2016) and is set to star in their upcoming film Mary Poppins returns. Miranda's awards include a Pulitzer Price two Grammy Awards, an Emmy Award, a Macarthur Award, and three Tony Awards.
Elize Ryd - ISFP