Actually the intentions behind what I said was that when I need to learn something I typically can easily comprehend it particularly if it is something that is mathematical, theoretical, conceptual and especially technological. But I can easily see how one would say that... either A) they're understanding of written word and thus their interpretations of said word(or even possibly actions) is typically shallow in nature or B) they're trolling. Which is it?
I mean seriously... I fail to venture deeply into things... how about you come to my playing field and will discuss the shortcommings of javascripting, or perhaps the implementation of classes in C or argue about the pros and cons of using the ext4 filesystem or maybe discuss the logic behind the die structure of amd's bulldozer processor or anything to do with android, linux, coding, hardware etc. or perhaps you'd rather discuss the applications of politics to real life or mountain biking or quantum physics... yes I may have lots of interests but that's because I can... I understand things easily and thus have the ability to pursue them depth...
Also explain to me how both Laura and I are SEE... we're entirely different... she is an extreme feeler and everything I do is based off of logic... even when I "feel" I usually derive the feeling from a chain of logic(not saying in moments of stress I don't allow feeling to take over but in normal situations they are at most simmering on the back burner if not completely ignored)
Also I realize that your grasp of idioms(and definitions for that matter) is rather poor but the phrase you just butchered has more to do with "it's not the destination, but the journey that matters" but good try... we all mess up
Lol... neglects analysis of their ideas... reminds me of this person (pst it her ^)
I've met... I don't neglect analysis as long as the premises of the analysis are sound in reasoning and as far as can tell yours are not...