Fe. She's just being playful.
Fe. She's just being playful.
lmao, it's a guy...that's what makes it so creepy and gross.
What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
Honestly I think that would turn off a great number of women of many types.
To me it sounds like serious dichotomy. Fi. I can't really imagine what an Fe type would have to gain from speaking any deep feelings.
What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
Is calling someone "sweetheart," "dear," etc. type-related? I've never been able to bring myself to do it, unless I'm joking around. Fe? Fi? NTR?
I highly doubt its Fi or Fe, the same sentences could have been written in a normal language without loosing much content/feelings and loosing a lot of "what the f*** is wrong with you" in them. would be the reaction for most people I know and I know people with various types.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
The second paragraph sounds a lot like the sort of thing an ILE friend regales me with from time to time.
And okay, there's a certain language you wind up speaking with people you're close with. The surface words become a whole lot less meaningful in contrast to whatever's being said between the lines. My friend is being a drama queen but showing his affection, and that's cool.
Probably part of the reason both excerpts are so sickening is because we're just not privy to whatever context the things were said in. First paragraph is obviously someone very, very in love. We're not the person they're in love with so it's funky weird to us.
I mean, when we look at some Latin poetry it can sound SO WEIRD. "I love you with all my liver." That's crazy and over-the-top to us but that's because we're not Roman poets.
What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov