Ladies and Gents :)

[miss BabyDoll]

People make judgements all the time, and you don't need solid proof to get to the truth of the matter. To rely only on solid proof limits your ability to know about your environment. You can work on what you have and you see which pieces of the puzzle glue together in such a way as to make most sense.

yes they do i'm aware of that. i'm a solid proof and logical conclusion type of person i guess. i did that - i've studied my type in detail and LSI se fits the best and it's most precise.

[Olly From Wally World]

Are you C in DCNH? And while I currently hate enneagram, what's your wing and stacking?

[miss BabyDoll]

Are you C in DCNH? And while I currently hate enneagram, what's your wing and stacking?

yes olly i am C! lol enneagram is debatable sure ha i'm 1w2 3w2 6w5 sx/so= sp

[Olly From Wally World]

yes olly i am C! lol enneagram is debatable sure ha i'm 1w2 3w2 6w5 sx/so= sp

Mhmmm, so you will seem more ExxP-like than LSI's generally are and the 2 wing will possibly make you warmer.

[miss BabyDoll]

Mhmmm, so you will seem more ExxP-like than LSI's generally are and the 2 wing will possibly make you warmer.

yes that's exactly it. if we really want a debate regarding my type the only one logical would be if i'm sle-ti N type or LSI-se C type as they can be quite similar.. but i repeat lol i'm sure of my type

[Reficulris]

I think she did not ask to type her.
Else she knows herself better then we all here.
And third thing, somehow everybody ends up with at least 6-8 hypothesis coming from different people in different directions.
I for instance ended up with everything except LSE, SEE and SLE.
Typing overall can be subjective and illusional to some extent...

If she decided to be an LSI, let her come up to another type herself.

Miss:
1) you are sweet
2) you are hot
3) and here I have nothing to say but 3 is better than 2, so here is another for you!

You forgot about typing being also political.

The only cases in which it's reasonable to question someones self typing unasked is if you want to annoy them or when you want to forcefully mold them into your dual.
MBD, clearly you are SLI/SEI cuz we vibe so well together ;-)

[miss BabyDoll]

You forgot about typing being also political.

The only cases in which it's reasonable to question someones self typing unasked is if you want to annoy them or when you want to forcefully mold them into your dual.
MBD, clearly you are SLI/SEI cuz we vibe so well together ;-)

refi YES i agree with what you said!
for some reason person here has to match beskova/stratiyevskaya desc to a T and only then can be a certain type lol
and lol of course, i'm actually SEI and this is all part of my hidden agenda haha

[Olly From Wally World]

Not LSI IMO - not convinced. But you remind me of sisofnight who types IEI. It would be great boon if you could automatically provide some Ti except I see good at jokes and skilled in maneuvering round people's idiosyncrasies.

IEI for now. Types like SEE are interesting though.

Heard someone was requesting some T.I.

Attachment 4083

[Ron Mexican]

I see you've met the peanut gallery, mbd.

[wacey]

anake i never seriously asked to be typed, i was merely joking! i choose not to display my ti cause i dont take this forum seriously - i dont enter debates on purpose cuz i dont like the potential conflict and dont want to be bothered with it. my base is e1 and that's tried and tested and proven. my polr is Ne and LSI's polr description function fits perfecty so i dont see me as being any other type among other things that also correspond to the LSI function desc! i really appreciate the analysis but i truly dont agree with it

Not yet you don't!

[Ron Mexican]

Are you C in DCNH? And while I currently hate enneagram, what's your wing and stacking?

yes olly i am C! lol enneagram is debatable sure ha i'm 1w2 3w2 6w5 sx/so= sp

Here's what this says

2. Creative
This subtype, conversely, is the least similar to the canonical type description. It is the most flexible subtype. It has a strong inclination toward "Mirror", as though the 1st and 2nd functions had switched places. The introvert is similar to the extravert, and the extravert to the introvert. And in general all type features in Creative are watered down.

It seems there is a feeling that with Creative subtype the intertype relationships are also "watered down" -- because he conducts himself "outside the box" by the standards of his type.

...We just like to confuse people

[miss BabyDoll]

Not yet you don't!

haha lol wacey dont rock the boat

[miss BabyDoll]

Miss Babydoll, do you know of a good page that compares the different POLRs in a sort of clearly differentiated way?

spidey, t16t has great filatova descriptions of each type and its functions among which thepolr as well! stratiyevskaya (although a bit partial) has good descriptions too i'd advise you to browse t16t article section in general and investigate a bit particularly about the model a and its building blocks

[miss BabyDoll]

Thank you miss babydoll

anytime spidey!