ESFps are not dumb by default.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
That's nice. not a fucking sterotype xD
It's actually make sense to me now.
What she said, like feelers are more immuned to criticisms because they exercise their emotions very well. Okay. Check ☑. I'm definitely a feeler type.
Okay. No doubt about it. That's the reason why I'm more Insensitive to criticism compared with my thinker friends because I've seen they really take criticisms seriously. make sense now.
And the energy fluctuations as well. dang it.
I have low and high energy ⚡ in one day. That's my life. One hour I'm sad, after two hours I'm happy again.
But i practiced my intuition anyways.
I have a lot of that.
I actually don't know if I'm an ENFP who learned to live in the moment
Or an ESFP who learned to be an intuitive. 🤔
But i can relate to both. Probably esfp because enfp really really really think deeply. And i don't wanna think deeply that much. I introspect in a positive way, but never really dig deep. Because it just depressed the fuck out of me.
can't stop laughing.
Anyways... there are bright SEEs.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
ESFps repel books into the book-attracting arms of INTps.
@idontgiveaf: Do you know what hurts?
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
I think SEE's *tend* to appear more shallow than others, because of their simple outlook at things, childlike behavior often (silliness) and having an ILI to compare to just makes it worse.
My SEE hubby reads a lot, but only modern books, some of which I read, but I also read classics of all sorts and informative things and ... he reads about sports the most, and won't watch intelligent movies or much fantasy or sci-fi, prefers some action and lots of hallmark movies (ugh!)
He's not dumb, just has a different intelligence quotient and way of using it. For my hubby it's his job, knowing a lot about what he sells and the things he handles are vast and growing frequently.
Trivial Pursuit = ILI
Rock em' Sock em' = SEE
I totally resonate! (except i haven't tried programming - mostly because I worry i might get bored from the tedium, but i could be wrong)
But just fyi - intelligence isn't type related, so your personal experience with your friend might be confounding your impression of ESFp's.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I like reading modern stuffs too.
But when it comes to movies i like the mind fuck genre like Fight club, old boy, donnie darko, etc.
I used to love Mr robot too. I used to love Game of thrones too and i like animes a lot. I know a lot of anime. My favorite is attack on titans.
Yea i dont think that "being good at maths" can be used as a measure for sociotype. Its really more how you relate to others than personal skills, which can always be learned.
You sometimes hopeless cases with logical when it comes to math. Then there are logic people who are not interested in it. Sometimes there are people who just leaned math through memorization (teachers...). Some ethical people like to claim that they do not like math math because they won't obey math authority (LOL. It is not something that people can dictate how it works... It is 100 % discovered.).
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
This:
I know it hurts you, c'mon. If not, then you would have already understood that you're clearly an ESFp and you would have stopped mixing Socionics with MBTI everywhere in this forum, as well, which is one of the most annoying things ever IMO. I'm not gonna use against you because I learned that it's just not worth the effort. I love helping people, it makes me feel satisfied. But if my help is not appreciated, or even etiquette as "stupid" without a reason, I no longer want to help that person anymore. Stop quoting me, please. And no, I don't like your jokes.
I think I need an ESE now.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
What's the "stop quoting me" part that you don't understand?
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
@idontgiveaf: You wanted it.
Choose 10 true statements about you, relate each of them with one (or more) IE(s) in order to theoretically explain, in terms of Model A, that you're not an ESFp, as you say.
If you can provide me a non-arguable analysis of those statements, and the reasons why you're not an ESFp as well, then you'll have win this dispute.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
@idontgiveaf: FYI, I'm not a nerd. A lot of people say that my personality could fit the stereotypical nerd, but at the same time think I'm not.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
@User Name
I also play with the pen
https://youtu.be/a_bl4EzfH70
Do esfp do that?
I didn't ask you to prove that you're a nerd. I just wanted you to demonstrate that you aren't an ESFp using Socionics theory. You didn't do that. I'm sorry but I think it's your PoLR's fault. And please stop with these stereotypes. "Nerd =/= ESFp" is not a law. Same thing for "nerd = INTj". I think I'm the winner.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
Explain how did you became a fucking winner?
Just asking for mere Socionics theory without any proff is just flawed. I can just simply say or copy one sentence proving I am also a Ti user like this:
I like talking about facts or theories and information – when conversation turns to people or events, my eyes glazing over.
I require a great deal of alone time. I AM NOT shy about overtly ignoring others if i infringe on this.
I have a grumpy or aloof demeanour but a good sense of humour beneath it.
In conversation, i may ask slightly different versions of the same question multiple times, as i try to figure out precisely how it fits in with what i already know.
I may zone out of conversations as i relate what you’re saying to their current understanding of the topic – and then zone back in to ask clarifiers.
Etc...