Did you know I sparkle in the sunshine?
Did you know I sparkle in the sunshine?
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
EII CONFIRM!Originally Posted by Scapegrace
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Hey, at least you have a maritsionics type.
Guys, I think Maritsa is actually correct in noticing an example of Se.
That's a good catch, Maritsa. Because Kim is being very firm in her beliefs. I don't necessarily believe she's SEE, but she's using Se to actually defend Ne open-mindedness. She seemed to not like people picking one belief (in this case religion) and imposing that on others, pressuring them in a way.
Here's what Wikisocion says about Se as a Role function (IEE & ILE):
It's possible that 1. Kim thought you were pressuring others with your beliefs or 2. Kim was severely irritated by what you said, or some combination of both. Also, it's relatively common for Mirror partners to butt heads over different beliefs.
It's possible she's SEE, Maritsa, but it's also possible she's IEE still, even if you felt she hit your Se-PoLR. It's possible to be annoyed by others in your own quadra.
Just my 2cents. Hope you are well.
Just noticed this is page 69 in this thread... hehe... giggity.
That's what preachers do, Maritsa.
I guess this means that Maritsa is SEE too?
Maritsa babe, lets dualize.
My post was about Kim NOT being SEE although she has firm beliefs.
Oh okayJust framing it equally. One can say quite firmly that just about everyone has firm beliefs and are willing to voice them on this forum.
No way! She's Malkavian!
As we reach for the stars, we must put away childish things; gods, spirits and other phantasms of the brain. Reality is cruel and unforgiving, yet we must steel ourselves and secure the survival of our race through the unflinching pursuit of science and technology.
- Stellaris
@Saberstorm LSE confirm and Final
OMG you're my dual
how could I have missed that
-
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Legerdemain LSE confirm.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I have a very sexy, hot, boyfriend.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Does he want the D too?I have a very sexy, hot, boyfriend.
Reason is a whore.
@mallow I'm going with Final on Perceptual type or "p" I'm undecided now between ISTp and ISFp but I'm still more sure about ISFp; it seems when you were younger, you looked more ENFp, but you don't seem to be hypersocial as ENFp are.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I test INTp, but I'll read up on ISTp or ISFp and get back to you with more info. Ive never tested those types, but I also recognize that I know very little about socionics in general.I think I have Te and Fi though.
@marista
Interesting! I relate more to ISFp. *reads more* thanks the first half makes sense, however a lot of it sounds opposite to me, especially near the end. I was excited for a second thinking it made sense, but I haven't quite found a type that makes more than half sense for me. I think socionics is missing a lot. If it weren't, less people would be confused and I would test properly. I've taken 4 different tests and come out with INTp on three and INTj on another.
Something is missing.
YES. I re-read it and it fits perf. Thanks.
Legerdemaine um SLI (?)
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
SLE
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
why do you think this?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
At times he seems so rational and at times he does things I wouldn't expect of someone who would be so concerned about having a public image. IDK I just don't see him as an Se ego type because he doesn't fit the temperament of Ep; it seems like he's closer to Ip
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Kirana LII confirm final added to list
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
God, I lul at this every time I read it. Thanks.
Name13 SEE confirm and final
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You're even better at socionics than Maritsa is.
Scapegrace is a word. One word. Invest in a dictonary.
By the way: who the fuck ever said Ashton is anything but ENTj? I'm also pretty sure that people don't usually think I'm beta either. That's Maritsa's dipshit theory.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
I've been on this forum since I was a child. I have never seen anyone venture to suggest that Ashton is anything other than LIE expect for Maritsa because she's delusional.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Eeew.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Ashton was identifying as INTj iirc :/
ew.
HA. I just scrolled up and saw Scapegrace's post of ew. funny.
...that is all.
'member when people were like "Ashton is ESTp/ENTj" etc?
Welcome back, Ananke. Haven't talked with you in a couple years.
I agree with your typings for Ashton, Maritsa, and Hitta.
SL & Gilly I still think are EIE.
I haven't seen those typings for Joy, Aqua, or Scape before. Sort of interesting.
I suspect Joy may possibly be LSE or ESE. She and I seem to be very similar and tend to annoy others at times.
Aqua - I wasn't aware people typed him Beta. I thought SLE was a far-off guess for him by some confused people. He seems ILE to me.
Scape - I never really liked the IEI typing for her. Not sure about ESI. She seems logical to me. If I were forced to guess, I think she may be ILI, but that's not my CONFIRMED opinion.
Anyway, glad to see you again!
I can say with much certainty that Scape is ILI and Gilly EIE.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
I was being usually rotten this morning. I turn into hell spawn when I go without sleep and food.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
confirmed and final
but he knew I typed him LSE a very long time ago
we got along very well from the get go and a lot of our thoughts and sayings coincided...magic
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Derailing it by presenting solid justification behind your typings? Are you being sincere or sarcastic?
Johari/Nohari
"Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."
Fruit, the fluffy kitty.
who, leger?confirmed and final
but he knew I typed him LSE a very long time ago
we got along very well from the get go and a lot of our thoughts and sayings coincided...magici'd love to hear his thoughts on that.
anyways. I type him as SLI. he's a jokester and comes off SLE-ish but talking to him one-on-one he seems to value Ne and Fi more than Ni.
Posting Permissions
