What I used is Fi demonstrative. Anyway, try to learn theory, and type yourself correctly instead of trying to offend others that don't give a shit of what you think.
You are the only one here that keeps talking about Si valuing it, did you know?
Anyway, this is the last answer you get from me, because you are not worth my time.
Must be that time of the month.
Not saying one way or another about her type, just addressing your comment specifically. Sometimes people like to act professional when they are putting something out there for the public. Its called being polished. Maybe for an Fe-polr like your self, you might have a difficult time of doing that? But no need to say that others struggle with your same struggles. That she behaves factual could simply mean she is trying to be professional. On the same note, english is not her first language, so she might not be speaking as fluently and naturally as she might otherwise. If you have ever spoken in a foreign tongue, then you know how challenging it can be to find the right words while maintaining a natural cadence and speaking rhythm. Again, I am not passing judgement on her sociotype, just explaining my reasoning for some of what I see going on in her video.
I applaud her efforts and courage to forgo anonymity.
EJ "cold, devoid of emotion" appearance (in the sense of an ability to put up the necessary faces for the public, adapting to context, not going by an internal flow) - but no factual and objective info.
Did you listen to what she was saying though? This is one of the reasons why I don't think VI is very reliable. People tell me I look sad, emotionless or mad in photos when I am not. I have seen several of her videos and I see different sides of her in each one. I have videos of myself that range from being stoic, romantic to hyper enthusiastic. I was even told that one of my vids seemed "manipulative" when I wasn't consciously intending it to be and that kind of bothered me when I realized why it came off that way. Having shown people my videos I have been typed all kinds of things that didn't fit. Like SLE and social first 4 (two different vids).
It makes sense that if she wants to reach out and share her ideas that she might try to maintain a different kind of demeanor than usual. When she first joined I was all like, "she is doing a video explaining socionics, I couldn't do that therefore she must not be IEI." I feel silly now just for going there. I started listening to the videos and seeing how we use our functions very similarly and it was like a lightbulb going off over my head. I know people see things differently but that is my perception and I am sticking to it.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
She looks the same in 2 other videos - my first vibe was NTp and the second was the complete lack of Inspiration which means Gamma Quadra and I don´t look for subjective perception on how a person comes across.
Yes I did despite the content it is important to focus on how and in which words it is presented.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
So, we have a mistyped EII attempting to use Te and an obvious Fe PoLR attempting to VI type.... please tell me more, this is freaking hilarious
Please less bickering and more Te-POLR discussion....
Thanks!!
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
@Aylen, don't let yourself be mislead in this bunch of Te arguments. Ni is subjective and perceptive. An IEI lives in the realm of her subjectivity. One thing said about IEIs is that they have the ability to make crocodiles fly very close to the ground, why because of Ni perception that can make paradoxes make sense and weak Ti that creates editable structures. Now, yes, I am more factual then your average IEI because I am dualizing and I trust my dual completely about the sources he provides me.
This said, I think it's very easy to attack others when they are exposing. I wish they weren't doing so just because they are afraid to lose ground and lose prestige in matters of socionics when people will find out they actually don't really know that much. But after all that's not my problem.
EJ stubbornness and continuous projection.
An EII would feel sympathy for your poor ass whose self-image is so far from reality and would try to put you in some broader context (maybe she's depressed, maybe her bf left her long ago, that's why she looks so gross and she has so much acne on her face, maybe she just wants to be her idealized intuitive self, poor girl)
Even a Fe polr is able to notice the lack of Fe creative "overt emotionality" ... that's how crass the fake is.
Last edited by Amber; 01-20-2015 at 07:28 PM.
Sorry if I come off as crass, here, but it's just socionics. I know nothing of this socionics relevant prestige you speak of.
Anyway, interesting video. I figured you as xxFp and I don't see the scruples others see in your type, but you would have a very hard time convincing me of logical and rational with your typing, not that I'd get up your vagina about it. The hostility here is pretty pointless, though. I swear, this place never changes when it comes to shutting people down and making people's self-typings SO FREAKING PERSONAL. It's just socionics, JESUS FUCK. WHY DO PEOPLE FEEL THE NEED TO ANTAGONIZE PEOPLE OVER THEIR FUCKING TYPE. CHRIST IN HEAVEN.
Carry on. I needed to vent that, though.
theys activators me wonders.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung