.
Hotelambush Questionnaire (Video)
.
Last edited by Rei; 11-08-2017 at 11:43 PM.
I'd say ILI. Seemsvaluing. If not, then SLI.
You remind me of someone I know, but I can't place who that is right now.
Yeh, probably ILI.
ILI-Te I think
I, T
most possibly SLI
Kakarot, if you will not be lazy, I'd want to see how you'd sort my IR test.Originally Posted by Kakarot
I'd say ILI. Seems
Ne types do it best, so you may get the confirmation or disproof of my opinion about your base Ne as more possible.
you may compare gamma vs delta F types, - which ones are more psychically comfort
my IR test unfortunally has not much IEE men, but you may look anyway
You like Ne types more, than Se. This points to SLI version.
Did you make the sorting with open key?
> bottom four were INTp, INFp, ESFp, and ISFj
fits to SLI better also
> The possibility of having a caregiver romantic style is not very appealing to me though
Maybe an experience of romantic relations with dual or semi-dual will give taste to it.
I watched and listened to the whole video. I also like ILI for you for totally subjective reasons. You remind me of an ILI I knew for years, including your preference in humor and your answer to this one question, "If you were to raise a child, what would be your main concerns, what measures would you take, and why?"
You even VI similar. Plus kindred intertype sounds cooler than super-ego. No offense to SLI.I don't involve myself in many typing threads so being drawn to yours has to count for something to.
I recently got into essential oils. I am hooked.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
So you sorted with the closed key as was supposed. That's good. It would be useful if you'd placed your results in IR test theme, so people saw how IR test works on practice.
> I also noted the results point to SLI rather than ILI. I might as well go find some IEE and SEE and see how it goes just to be positive
yep. it's good to check IR effects on IRL people near you
But as you may understand, the probability that I've said SLI as main version and then accidentally you've choosen its dual+semidual among top4 and also placed superego among bottom4 is not high. You've gotten not bad confirmation of SLI version by independent method. While ILI is rather doubtful as among bottom4 are their dual, activator and identity.
Very clear video! I would find it hard to see any type other than ILI.
observations:
-reclusive, spend a lot of time to yourself (low Se and Fe, high Ni)
-lots of Fi language, in particular with Se: loyalty, trust, likes people who are "sweet, genuine, sensitive", wants to know "what my position is"
-finds environmental maintenance and hygiene annoying, necessary evils (low Si)
-don't like people who try to read you or are too charismatic (devalued Fe)
-avoids conflict, conflict creates stress (low Se)
-interest in being "successful" in life career-wise, making money (Se/Te values)
-emphasis on being independent, self-sufficient, not asking others for help to an extreme degree
-holds grudges (FiSe), takes personal offense often
-crude/dark sense of humor (Se/Ni values)
-tries to be polite and not get in people's way (Si)
-seen as serious/unemotional (low Fe)
No. A lot - not all!- of these assessments are things that apply to people in general, or don't hold true for many exceptions. It is easy to type someone into open-ended characteristics, or to tailor anybody into them to justify the TIM choice. Once I watched the video, I'll give this an overhaul and see if the ILI typing has to be challenged or not.
lol give it an overhaul?How about you watch the video FIRST and then make comments.
You are right that I am too fast though after watching it is clear what you mistook - she is self-pres first! That explains a lot.lol give it an overhaul?
ILI
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Hahaha. You have a charming deadpan humour reminds me of this portuguese girl that I've talked to but also someone that I've never actually talked to but she has a similar way of speaking. Sorry this isn't helpful. And maybe it's also that she makes similar faces while thinking... she had a lot to say haha, monologued with lots of details and emotions behind her experiences which I found endearing.
Oh ok so this is about you. I really do like INTp for you.
@Rei okay great! SP/SO would also be my pick, SP/SX would be way darker and intimately focused.As for enneagram... 5w6 or 6w5, 9w8, maybe 3w4 head fix... dunno.
What I have also observed with your other questionnaire in mind is that ILI might not be the accurate choice although Gamma (or Delta!) is a nice start - brace yourself, I thought ESI-Fi.is strong at least. Interest in people is too high, too much ethics.
Emotional ("...this is sad!") and moral language too suspiciously non-ILI-like. The INTp notion likely comes from your INTP MBTI result mixed with a scientific career and more reclusive character but that didn't indicate the elements that you used! For a supposedly low! You are not the character to make sense of something except maybe creating some order. In fact, I saw more
! Comfort sensing. And some
conflict awareness with revenge, thoughts on war, though not as strong.
- where... where?! Where are the predictions, the symbolism, the purpose?
TL;DR: ethics > logic, introtim,,
harmonizing subtype generally has this, regardless of type.
harmonizingI saw more
You seem to be looking too much for explicit stereotypes. The Ni is right there all the time.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think you're pretty cool.
ILI. Thought LII or SLI for a while as somewhat remote second and third options but based on the actual content ILI.
and I just checked your channel: you clicked likes on hodge twins (I get lots of pressure in form of arguments from that duo – I have to stop out of frustration).
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Hodge twins seem straightforward Se dom (possibly SEE), so it makes sense ILI could be into them. SLI less so, but its hardly dispositive. I find Hodge twins irritating beyond belief myself
Tests are really only meant for quick-and-dirty typings, they aren't nearly as reliable as interview or video typings (as I'm sure Talanov himself would agree). No way are you SEI.
Last edited by Exodus; 11-08-2017 at 02:18 AM.
If the test gave you that result, I would keep it in mind.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote