She said examples of delta are ok but boring (common perception of Fi valued by Fe valued types). Gamma was worst what fits to idea of opposite quadra. While alpha gave most sympathy to her, especially ENTP and ISFP types. I think she's introverted type based on nonverbal behavior. Among most liked were ENFP and ENTP - types with base Ne, ESE was not said. So SEI seems as best version.
It's one of arguments for F type, as it's doubtful T type would compliment about his feelings in the signature. While the main basis to think her as more probable F is in nonverbal behavior.
My quadra is always right. So put that in your 8-track and smoke a sixteenth.
Persephone, based on video, - not LII, not LSI/SLE. F type is more probable. Among types close to LII the most possible is EII, but other types are admissible also, including Aaron's IEI.
Laurie’s Crusader has been moved to LSE-Si from LSE-Te.
EJ Arendee has been moved to ESI-Se from EIE-Fe.
ILI-Ni has been changed to ILI-Te and ILI-Te has been changed to ILI-Ni. Aestrivex stays at ILI-Te.
Words has been added to LSE-Te.
Do me lol
@Emmym I don't type you EII this is why I never made it final. I needed more time to observe your sympathies in relationships. Thus far I find your references more Aros rather than storge and filia. I have never read a reference that you have made towards a desired individual from the reference of a spiritual connection. You always talk about sex and your sexual desire Aros. I want to finalize SLI.
In this post especially I see a lot of New seeking
You see the old and familiar are comfortable and nice for the EII and LSE duality because they don't seek Ne they seek Fi, relationship. Ne seeking is someone looking for a hightenening external experience otherwise the vital tonus is depreciated.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-01-2016 at 03:59 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yes because of your heavy emphasis on eros instead of storge
Storgic lovers place much importance on commitment, and find that their motivation to avoid committing infidelity is to preserve the trust between the two partners. Children and marriage are seen as legitimate longterm aims for their bond,[7] while passionate sexual intensity is of lesser importance than in other love styles.[8]
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
someday the grapes will be wine
and someday you will be mine
EII-Ne 2w3 - 9w1 - 7w8 so/sx
@oldwhiskey can we dualise now?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You may create a typing thread with video. Or pm me link to the clip, in case you affraid stalkers or aliens.
someday the grapes will be wine
and someday you will be mine
EII-Ne 2w3 - 9w1 - 7w8 so/sx
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Went Google trolling me and had to shut down numerous online accounts. Normally I don't care, because being open with people is typically the best way to be there for them. Crosses a line when they display intent to harm and have enough information to do so to myself and loved ones irl.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html