Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 43 of 43

Thread: Stigma towards beta types

  1. #41
    The Chosen Prophet. Braingel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    TIM
    SCS EII, so4w5 461
    Posts
    4,331
    Mentioned
    214 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^(This by the way is another reason why I cannot be EIE>IEI; I do not ignore Fi at all). Despite coming off as Fe base.. Which that can explain through my subtype; IEI2Fe.
    I am in my head; not society.

    Yes, that is who I am, hence the bold am.​ Also, a brain angel. (+ my own incarnation of a Zelda concept).


    My thoughts align w action to succeed what needs (at least in my dreamed ideal, they do)…


    Dragons:

    Babies, click them to make them grow up into Kara’s Dragon Museum



    My favorite adult Museum Exhibits

  2. #42
    Tim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Deep South
    TIM
    SLE-C 8w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    249
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karanime View Post
    Any type that has Sx as their lead, will value relational intimacy. Fi just probably is more likely than Fe types to be Sx.

    It is true that most beta have poor Fi; EIE ignores it directly, LSI has lit lower and is not of it, valuing, and SLE has it as PolR. But I have met an Sx 8 SLE who very much cares about making connection with others, even if he is more focused on harmony. An IEI is built of any beta to be best with Fi, since it does not ignore it, and it still is quite strong.
    I would argued that SX instinctual variant falls more under the line of Se followed by Fe valuers than Fi valuers. Se is basically intensity of external sensation which is compatible with SX. Not to mention that there is a "loss of self" in SX instinctual variant. SX instinctual variant isn't relational connections. It's about feeling intensely (Fe+Se) which is strongly applied to Beta. SX 8s is literally the stereotypical SLE. It's aggressive and intense. You would see more SX 8s in SLE than SP and SO 8s. Betas, in general, are SX dominant. SX dominant are stereotyped as intense. Beta are also stereotyped as intense compared to other quadras. How SX and SLE are connected is that they are intense in everything they do. All or nothing is the slogan of SX dom.

    I think SP instinctual variant are more likely to be Serious types (Fi/Te valuers) if anything. Self-Preservation 3s and 8s are cheapskates and thus look like Te valuers because materialism, costs/savings, and being business-like are Te traits. Self-Preservation 4s are less emotionally expressive than the other 4s (given that they are countertype), and this is where Gamma / Delta 4s are at. Not being concerned about the regulations of emotional states and external emotional expression, concerned about building unexpressed relations (like a Japanese businessman), and valuing money-making productivity and pragmatism are traits of Te/Ti valuers and it sounds more like SP/SO (i.e. an SX-blind type) rather than SX type. Self-Preservation 2s is basically @Beautiful sky and she's a Fi/Te valuing type (EII).

    By the way, I'm SX/SP SLE and I'm not into making unexpressed social connections with others given that I'm SO-blind. I considered it part of Fi PoLR since there isn't any point of building relations with others especially if there isn't external emotional expression involved.
    Last edited by Tim; 06-23-2021 at 09:19 AM.

  3. #43
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Karanime View Post
    ^(This by the way is another reason why I cannot be EIE>IEI; I do not ignore Fi at all). Despite coming off as Fe base.. Which that can explain through my subtype; IEI2Fe.
    I am good at Ni too as an EII I can infer some wild predictions that arise out of nowhere and take a lot of alone time to “romanticize” I told an SEE one day “you like the scenery of the drive and are going to San Diego” he was so taken aback lol
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •