Quote Originally Posted by Raver View Post
Yes it is economical > humanitarian so 1st world nations remain 1st world nations and don't slowly de-evolve to 3rd world nations over time due to mass immigration/open borders. Humanitarianism is reserved for refugees that are in a life and death situation, not economic migrants looking for a better quality of life. The rest of immigration should be strictly controlled to allow highly skilled educated immigrants from anywhere in the world to allow them to retain their 1st world nation status.
that looks more reasonable and I can agree with that policy, just not with the mono-cultural/mono-ethnic stance, which is a different premise and I don't want to repeat what it seems..