Quote Originally Posted by queentiger View Post
I mean does type 2 even really fit with EIE and Fe-. Type 2, to me, seems very Fe+.
Also, the saying is "willy-nilly"
Yeah Type 2 descriptions mostly describe ESEs, that's why. Most 2s are ESEs because there are more ESEs than EIEs, on average. (That's my interpretation of it at least.)

People use both + and - of their lead (and probably also demonstrative, aka the strongest functions). It can be situational, some EIEs might use +Fe more often around certain types that value it. I've seen myself using more -Ni around my SEE sis, for example. Though in my case it is also a bit more conscious to be fair.

You can argue for -Fe and 2 through the connection with Type 8.

And... oops I am not a native speaker so sometimes i slip up