IEIs/INFps are you fickle?

[Aylen]

Even though they're very capable, many IEIs don't seem to probe that deeply into people in the beginning and when they actually do peer below the images, their opinions can change drastically. This delayed reaction can sometimes take a long time because they have been known to get caught in the rapture of whatever, which creates a sort of tunnel vision. I wouldn't describe the reaction as fickle because there's usually good reason although they may not voice it - they probably just didn't get the original message....

a.k.a. I/O

I don't think "fickle" is the right word even though I have read it in some descriptions. I think EP types are more fickle. It is something else. Hard to explain but your perception is valid. Also the majority of the forum is fickle when it comes to types. I don't put my socionics type in TIM since I like the mystery. When I played around with fake types in mine people absolutely treated me differently. lol Not those who actually talk to me and know me off the forum but those who only know me from posts did pose questions to me differently. Some who never talked to me pm-ed me and others avoided me until they knew I was just messing around.

Younger IEI can be too trusting and naive when it comes to people. Then they can go the total opposite direction after getting burned a few times too. There is a balance somewhere in between that comes with maturity and experience with all kinds of people. This can be said of any type I suppose.

I agree that IEI don't tend to hold grudges as much as other NFs.

"The introverted intuitive type, like the extraverted intuitive, has an uncanny capacity for smelling out the future, the notyet-manifest possibilities of a situation. But the intuition is directed within, hence they are primarily found among seers and prophets, poets, artists; among primitive peoples they are the shamans who convey the messages of the gods to the tribe. On a more mundane level, persons of this type tend to be mystical day-dreamers. They do not communicate well, are frequently misunderstood, lack good judgment about both themselves and others,..." Jung

[Myst]

I don't think "fickle" is the right word even though I have read it in some descriptions. I think EP types are more fickle. It is something else. Hard to explain but your perception is valid. Also the majority of the forum is fickle when it comes to types. I don't put my socionics type in TIM since I like the mystery. When I played around with fake types in mine people absolutely treated me differently. lol Not those who actually talk to me and know me off the forum but those who only know me from posts did pose questions to me differently. Some who never talked to me pm-ed me and others avoided me until they knew I was just messing around.

Younger IEI can be too trusting and naive when it comes to people. Then they can go the total opposite direction after getting burned a few times too. There is a balance somewhere in between that comes with maturity and experience with all kinds of people. This can be said of any type I suppose.

I agree that IEI don't tend to hold grudges as much as other NFs.

"The introverted intuitive type, like the extraverted intuitive, has an uncanny capacity for smelling out the future, the notyet-manifest possibilities of a situation. But the intuition is directed within, hence they are primarily found among seers and prophets, poets, artists; among primitive peoples they are the shamans who convey the messages of the gods to the tribe. On a more mundane level, persons of this type tend to be mystical day-dreamers. They do not communicate well, are frequently misunderstood, lack good judgment about both themselves and others,..." Jung

rahmyn was more honest about this than you

but feel free to keep talking behind my back anyhow

also feel free to try and get back at me for this lol I don't care

[Aylen]

rahmyn was more honest about this than you

but feel free to keep talking behind my back anyhow

What are you talking about? Why would you think I am talking behind your back based on my response to someone else? I was talking about my ESI best friend not you in second post you quoted.

[Myst]

What are you talking about? Why would you think I am talking behind your back based on my response to someone else? I was talking about my ESI best friend not you.

I was told awhile ago that you were complaining about me behind my back : p but in my face you continued trying to be nice to me

And the dishonesty I mentioned is about not wanting to admit a lot of the "IEI stuff" actually does come off very fickle

[Aylen]

I was told awhile ago that you were complaining about me behind my back : p but in my face you continued trying to be nice to me

And the dishonesty I mentioned is about not wanting to admit a lot of the "IEI stuff" actually does come off very fickle

Don't you know second hand information is not that reliable by now but if you would like to put us together then I can ask them what they are talking about? Otherwise this was pointless and weirdly emotional response to something not related to you. You and I haven't talked in so long I can't even remember the last time. If you had something to say about that then the time was when it happened.

Actually what was the complaint and I can tell you now if it is true or not.

[Myst]

Don't you know second hand information is not that reliable by now

Barely anyone is reliable lol, whether second hand or not. Very few people are.

"by now", lol

but if you would like to put us together then I can ask them what they are talking about? Otherwise this was pointless and weirdly emotional response to something not related to you. You and I haven't talked in so long I can't even remember the last time. If you had something to say about that then the time was when it happened.

Actually what was the complaint and I can tell you now if it is true or not.

Like I said I don't care if you are trying to get back at me for this.

And it was definitely related to me in that we talked before and then you do this. But then you don't admit to your own fickleness here (and manipulativeness either).

So no thanks I don't need you trying to save face, just don't talk to me in future. Have a nice and happy life, good-bye.

[Aylen]

Barely anyone is reliable lol, whether second hand or not.

"by now", lol




Like I said I don't care if you are trying to get back at me for this.

And it was definitely related to me in that we talked before and then you do this. But then you don't admit to your own fickleness here (and manipulativeness either).

So no thanks I don't need you trying to save face, just don't talk to me in future. Have a nice and happy life, good-bye.

I have no idea what you are talking about and you sound paranoid since I have nothing to "get back at you" with. I don't think I have said a thing behind your back I haven't said to you or wouldn't say to you. This whole exchange is weird.

Edit: If this even happened it was probably related to someone complaining about you and I said you can be an interrogator when it comes to socionics which is not something that should surprise you or leave you holding a grudge so long it took you until now to say something about it. Maybe you should ask the person what THEY said about you first? You totally blew things out of proportion with your response to me here.