All I know is: my personality imago is enneagram 1 as hell.Originally Posted by Adam Strange
That would be the perfect example of what Cassandra described, discrepancy between visual and character imago preference.
All I know is: my personality imago is enneagram 1 as hell.
That would be the perfect example of what Cassandra described, discrepancy between visual and character imago preference.
Hmmm. Isn't projecting where you assign your own properties to someone or something else? What would I be projecting?
You both lack experience and understanding. That will come in time.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I don't think there has to be a discrepancy between visual and character Imago preferences.
For instance, my visual Imago is predominately dark-haired and/or has dark eyes, etc.
Many different types can have that combination.
However, if you mean by "visual" how someone dresses themselves, and/or how they move and smile and talk, then I'd say this is actually closer to the character part, because those aspects are influenced by personality (types).
The issue ain't theory, it's about the subjective and predisposed views of peopleAdam is SLE-ing again, and you - the person who types ESI after ESI, I've seen your blog - are in the same mechanism
Personally I cannot categorize all of my pictures as Beta NF, they all differ so much.
Nah, the truth is somewhere in between hereI don't think there has to be a discrepancy between visual and character Imago preferences.
For instance, my visual Imago is predominately dark-haired and/or has dark eyes, etc.
Many different types can have that combination.
However, if you mean by "visual" how someone dresses themselves, and/or how they move and smile and talk, then I'd say this is actually closer to the character part, because those aspects are influenced by personality (types).
That's a very sweeping statement...
Especially considering Adam's (dating) history and such, how is he inexperienced?? Haha.
Oh well. xD
SLE 8. Just as in your presentation of how IEEs approach SLIs above, same principle happened.
My blog, you mean my deleted blog entry on the types of some of the people on this forum?The issue ain't theory, it's about the subjective and predisposed views of people
Well, I've also got a typing blog where most people on there aren't ESI, so... It is not like I type most people I come across as ESI by default.
Big picture.
He might have dated lots of types but doesn't seem he has any depth of understanding. Perhaps you have had deeper conversations with him. I go by the posts I have read.
Is your thumbnail green?
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
/furious choir chants of
Now, what would be your assessment of my pictures?
/imitates Aylen/ You will see what I mean... in timeMy blog, you mean my deleted blog entry on the types of some of the people on this forum?
Well, I've also got a typing blog where most people on there aren't ESI, so... It is not like I type most people I come across as ESI by default.
Almost overlooked this post! Ahh cute. ~<3 Strangey can step up his game but I let a drag queen gif tell him that from time to time no worries.
My assessment is your angelic looking creatures are amazing to look at. I would have to really focus on their energy and maybe read something about them to even offer a typing. I would rather do that in private. <3/furious choir chants of
Now, what would be your assessment of my pictures?
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I have one more I wanted to post! Mom gave me a postcard with this image when I was 10,11? Don't know. Either way, I find this sooo appealing.
Dicap 1997 by Annie Leibowitz:
Angelic is good! Handjob is among that collection since day one hehe. Sweet offer! I was merely asking for a vibe feeling but if you like the complexity of it, why not it's enlightenting for sure
Like the boy who saved my life when I was drowning type? I only saw him for less than a minute. I have been attracted to that type even before I hit puberty. That is not all I find attractive though. Many factors do go into it.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
What would be the unsafe one... wohaha
I think I can appear like an SLE e8 for a short time and from a distance, but I consistently test as an LIE with lots of Se, which I attribute to being sx-first and to the test's inabilities to perfectly separate the two. Also, I know a lot of IEI females, but I've never had sex with one, despite having one who wants a LTR. I'm actually attracted to Aggressors.
And Aylen might be right about my depth of understanding. I've been flying by the seat of my pants, out of Delta and into Aggressorland, and that probably accounts for a lot of my wanderings. However, I will say, I do know what feels right, and it is both Gamma and Aggressor.
Adam's Jung Test results.jpg
Adam's Extended Socionics test results - pg 2 of 2.jpg
Adam's Big Five Test Results - 00 - Commander.jpg
Adam's Instinct Stack 2016-03-26.jpg
Adam's Enneagram test Results, 8w7, 3w2, 6w7.jpg
I know from experience how tests only mirror how you want to see yourself, not how you actually are. But as you said, rain drops, your type will find you ~.~
LOL I don't even know these people. How do you expect me to know their personality after viewing them a few seconds? If you observed more and let things synthesize in your brain your typings would be more accurate. You go for for superficial details.
You seem to see yourself as the one true oracle on this forum. That is not true intuition. It is arrogance. Go on and type me ESI or some other random far off type. I have told you before I was you once. Life is going to knock you down a peg or two over time. It will prove you wrong repeatedly until you get the message. Then maybe you will find the true intuitive voice inside you. Remember I said this.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I work with two SLE's, an SLE-Ti and an SLE-Se, and they both treat me like a Benefactor rather than an Identical. One of the Conflictor SEI's at work hates everything about me, the other gets distressed from cognitive dissonance when I talk to her for more than a few minutes, despite the fact that I like her a lot. Plus, none of the IEI's here seem to be going out of their way to be nice to me. (Lol. Not that that's a bad thing.) My SLI father and son Supervisors both think I'm a screw-up. Also, I took those tests before I knew anything about LIE's or SLE's or enneagrams or stacks.
Oh, well. At least, no one has called me LSE in a while.
She's starting to remind me of a certain arrogant EII/LII combo t16t member you had a beef with.
That one is second on my list. Your anecdote about Cary Grant's suit, I remember itI work with two SLE's, an SLE-Ti and an SLE-Se, and they both treat me like a Benefactor rather than an Identical. One of the Conflictor SEI's at work hates everything about me, the other gets distressed from cognitive dissonance when I talk to her for more than a few minutes, despite the fact that I like her a lot. Plus, none of the IEI's here seem to be going out of their way to be nice to me. (Lol. Not that that's a bad thing.) My SLI father and son Supervisors both think I'm a screw-up. Also, I took those tests before I knew anything about LIE's or SLE's or enneagrams or stacks.
Oh, well. At least, no one has called me LSE in a while.)
No LIE anywhere to be seen, eh? Bummer.That one is second on my list. Your anecdote about Cary Grant's suit, I remember it
What do LIE's seem like to you, @Chae? In terms of looks, behaviors, preferences?
Eh, ideal attractiveness has a lot to do with culture and the country that you grew up in...
For example, this is Germany's "ideal face" of a female:
Original:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/ashleyperez...vvM#.roEOrBggJ
This seems to go in line with Chae's preference for more soft and ethereal look.
@Singularity good viewpoint!! Since Germany is very culturally Beta ST this could be the explanation why I select Beta NF members. Soft faces are somewhat valued here, less in males.
Go to the Elon Musk thread, I posted there
Warm built bodies. Broad shoulders. Expressionless cold-ish faces.
That's why most LSIs turn me on
C-EII-INFj 4w3 Sx/sp 479
This made me laugh, haha!What would be the unsafe one... wohaha
Let's just put this to rest...
I have one more I wanted to post! Mom gave me a postcard with this image when I was 10,11? Don't know. Either way, I find this sooo appealing.
Dicap 1997 by Annie Leibowitz:
You're so cute lmaoThis made me laugh, haha!
Let's just put this to rest...
Attachment 9530
Attachment 9532
It's impossible for me to be seriously attracted to someone without knowing their personality/vibe.
I don't find them to be attractive-attractive, but I just find their faces to be interesting:
This is pretty much an ideal face for me:
I'm sure that there are more if I bothered to look, but I'm too lazy.
For women, it's super cool if they're either emotionless, expressionless or sometimes have a mischievous smile.
So what is attractive-attractive to you?
Besides, are you bisexual? Just asking, because you posted both men and women, and not everyone does that in one post.
jessica lange when she was young, oh gosh
she's still hot now that she's old too tho, gah. i want her to STEP ON ME and carve me hollow with her cheekbones idhgdl
02_shrimpton.w750.h560.2x.jpg 003.jpg
and here's Jean Shrimpton!! i guess i just really love carved out looking faces if that makes sense? ugh, i'm bad at descriptions
when it comes to guys, i'm really picky... i can't really think of what i find physically attracting in men. maybe broad shoulders and strong cheekbones?
“You are a little soul carrying around a corpse.”
- Epictetus
Hmm... I think a dude with a giant antennae-like cowlick sticking up from the middle of his hair. Because after my hair cut it put the cowlick that has always been there in to full motion. With other hair cuts I could hide it. We could build a doomsday device in space, both wear evil capes, and control the doomsday device via our PSI cowlicks. Psychokino in unison.
Heterochromia and squat booty.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
