Results 1 to 40 of 70

Thread: Ni egos vs Se in close relationship

Threaded View

  1. #13
    Hot Scalding Gayser's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The evolved form of Warm Soapy Water
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    14,920
    Mentioned
    661 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm not so sure that those relationships are inherently more dysfunctional just because they are not dual types. That seems way too simple. And socionics is a facet of reality but I think that's given it too much value or something.

    I DO think though, I have this theory that Si/Ne valuing is way better for relationships in a realistic sense than Se/Ni is. Ne valuing seeing more potential hazards from a wider variety of sources (so can defend against them better) and Si just mediating & smoothing out difficulties more naturally, rather than about one's own willpower. Se/Ni takes more work or something...

    Relationships work on compromise and 'talking through things together' like a boring Delta sitcom. *tries not to throw up* Se doesn't want to compromise and Si just does it so much easier.

    And idk there is a lot of Beta bashing on this forum but I do think objectively beta with the valued functions would be the 'worst' at relationships and Delta would be the best and then Gamma/Alpha somewhere in the middle.
    Last edited by Hot Scalding Gayser; 10-20-2020 at 07:35 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •