Possible indication of the split between INVERSE types

[Angel von Himmel]

ENTjs are far more similar to INTps than ENTps are. The relationships aren't called relationships of CONTRAST for nothing.

That was what I thought ... while I was speaking to Rocky in the other thread, he seemed to have the impression that INTps and ENTps were more similar to each other than ENTps are to INTjs and INTps are to ENTjs ... Something just did not seem right logically with what he was trying to say.

Unless of course I misunderstood Rocky, which could be the case. I do not really consider myself an expert on socionics, but I can gauge when something just does not feel right in an intuitive sense.