Instincts vs Duality

[Jarno]

How you "feel" about them? Lol, thanks for proving my point. Like I said, there is zero basis for "flows." Nothing but feelsies but no substantiated model.

The whole socionics model is based on how people feel with eachother.

If you have 100 people describe the feeling they have with their dual in the same way, you have your information. How else do you want to get information besides feeling the relationship?? After that, you can start to form a model of what happened.

[Samson]

The whole socionics model is based on how people feel with eachother.

If you have 100 people describe the feeling they have with their dual in the same way, you have your information. How else do you want to get information besides feeling the relationship?? After that, you can start to form a model of what happened.

That's completely backwards. The model of Socionics is based on cognition first, relations second.

Besides, I'm speaking about the "flows." Use it as much as you'd like, just know it has nothing to do with the Enneagram.

[Jarno]

Besides, I'm speaking about the "flows." Use it as much as you'd like, just know it has nothing to do with the Enneagram.

I agree with this :-) For me instincts and flows work fine without enneagram.

[Samson]

I agree with this :-) For me instincts and flows work fine without enneagram.

You misunderstand. The instincts are the Enneagram. They are inherent to its core structure.

The "flows" have nothing to do with the Enneagram.

[Jarno]

You misunderstand. The instincts are the Enneagram. They are inherent to its core structure.

The "flows" have nothing to do with the Enneagram.

nah you can use instincts seperately, but i don't think it has much use in discussion, we see things way differently.

[Samson]

nah you can use instincts seperately, but i don't think it has much use in discussion, we see things way differently.

We definitely see things differently. The difference comes in that I can argue my case.