Quote Originally Posted by Investigator View Post
What beliefs?
You said I call my beliefs "reason". Which beliefs were you refering to?

Quote Originally Posted by Investigator View Post
Belief, as there is strong reason for the principle of causality.
As the universe having a cause is unfalsifiable, this cannot be true.

Quote Originally Posted by Investigator View Post
Believing rationalism doesn’t extend pass the universe is not logical, it is just signing your brain away to philosophical skepticism.
You cannot meaningfully make conclusions about what is beyond observation.

Quote Originally Posted by Investigator View Post
This is probably the worst comment you have made thus far. If Science couldn’t presuppose PSP, then none of its conclusions could be passed off as laws. Your thoughts aren’t as neat and logical as you think there are. I won’t get into the flawed “isolated system” argument, because you have proven to me you don’t understand your own words.

The leg work was worth it because you are a fool masked as a pragmatist.
They're called laws because they are absolutely true for a system that is fully understood for the applicable law. They cannot be said to be true when they is no prospect of them being proved true. You cannot presuppose that everything has a cause, because everything has not been observed to have a cause. Instead of saying "The universe must have a cause." a scientist should ask "Does the universe have a cause, and if so, what is it?".