I think MBTI and its system is better suited for the everyman. From what I have seen, MBTI emphasizes initial superficiality, whereas socionics is not shy about its more exploratory and theoretical side. I certainly think MBTI serves a good purpose as it is commonly interpreted, but the types are illustrated more like archetypes than anything. MBTI is just different is all, and is quite considerable under its own context. Just don’t expect all the “socionists” to know what they are talking about. I don’t know if I have said a single correct thing for as long as I have been active on this forum. Lol, that is part of the fun I guess.
Anyways, welcome!
You are still my favorite EII as I mentioned in this thread:
https://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/showthread.php/61473-Explain-relations-of-benefit-like-I’m-5-years-old