Originally Posted by Ashton
The quarrels of lovers are the renewal of love.
The quarrels of lovers are the renewal of love.
No way Absurd, you're the only gal for me.
We have to fight first, then reconcile. Okay, I'm outta here before this clogs up.
why would you ever want to fight in a
Perfect Relationship
☆ミ～
☆ミ～
☆ミ～
☆ミ～
☆ミ～
☆ミ～
☆ミ～
Just following example, sorry. My bad.
S'cool, I know how you 8s go and I got no problem with it so long as we definitely make up afterwards.
Stand down, Ashton. Stand DOWN.
Madison Woolbert - mb ISFJ
fb
Beyonce > SEE-Fi, in conversation with Oprah > EIE-Ni = relations of benefit
Noteworthy points >
- Notice Beyonce's more impassive, walled off, less mobile facial expressions (Fi) and overall demeanor in comparison to Oprah's more mobile, fluent, expressive, open, readily discernible (Fe) affect.
- In her questioning, Oprah tries to project her own Fe [enneagram 2w3] "need to please," "need to be liked," and chameleon like experience (always adapting to others, never being certain of her own identity) onto Beyonce's experience and Bey agrees to some extent but speaks to always having known who she was and never feeling the need to follow anyone or do what anyone else was doing, even as a kid (Fi).
- Beyonce says she's learned to be kind but strong, and that she must be fair to herself. She acknowledges that for the majority of her career, she's only given the public glimpses of who she is through her artistry and music because she believes that possessing a "mystique" is important. She says that there is still much that she doesn't share > Se and Fi af. Juxtaposed to Oprah who is the epitome of the bare all "open book."
- Oprah says that life is about connecting the dots and that there's a thread that runs through everyone's life and the purpose is to tether that thread to the dots (creative Ni); Beyonce says that she's beginning to notice the dots because she finally sees that they are everywhere and interrelated (suggestive Ni).
Last edited by Alonzo; 07-26-2019 at 01:23 PM.
madfortutorials - ISFJ
Anatoliy Akimov - ENTJ
or *NTP
Ken Hensley - INTP
Last edited by Sol; 10-14-2019 at 04:22 PM.
Reminds me of Tony Iommi. Also ILI maybe?
and Geezer Butler - SLI?
ZNE - ENTJ
Tony Iommi - mb ILE
Geezer Butler - mb INT*
Last edited by Sol; 10-18-2019 at 03:02 PM.
ENTj = no.
INTp = maybe.
ENTp= maybe.
@Aylen
when noobs criticize others' typing skills based on own match it's funny
you recently claimed that intuitive method VI uses mostly S, but not N. if you still think so, then instead of normal VI you are using physiognomy. and to type public people by what they talk randomly and publicly - is not good approach. then the usage of theoretical bs as Reinin. the lack of normal English texts to study the types and to understand them. even without your objectively not trained typing skills, there are objective doubts in what you are doing in typing. you ignore that all, the same as other noobs. those people are not well known to you, they are harder to be typed - they need better skills and specific methods as VI. while to get good skills in VI may take years. sure you'll get low matches with others and me. to get good match with me you need comparable skills. or higher conformism
noobs never change
@Aylen
when noobs criticize others' typing skills based on own match it's funny
you recently claimed that intuitive method VI uses mostly S, but not N. if you still think so, then instead of normal VI you are using physiognomy. and to type public people by what they talk randomly and publicly - is not good approach. then the usage of theoretical bs as Reinin. the lack of normal English texts to study the types and to understand them. even without your objectively not trained typing skills, there are objective doubts in what you are doing in typing. you ignore that all, the same as other noobs. those people are not well known to you, they are harder to be typed - they need better skills and specific methods as VI. while to get good skills in VI may take years. sure you'll get low matches with others and me. to get good match with me you need comparable skills. or higher conformism
noobs never change
you're so full of yourself and arrogant it's really hard to bear. most of your typings are garbage, and I think many users of this site will agree. your english is atrocious, how are you in any position to judge english socionics sources?
Didn't you VI me as IEE and then change your mind to SEI in part because I swear? Interesting...
@Aylen
when noobs criticize others' typing skills based on own match it's funny
you recently claimed that intuitive method VI uses mostly S, but not N. if you still think so, then instead of normal VI you are using physiognomy. and to type public people by what they talk randomly and publicly - is not good approach. then the usage of theoretical bs as Reinin. the lack of normal English texts to study the types and to understand them. even without your objectively not trained typing skills, there are objective doubts in what you are doing in typing. you ignore that all, the same as other noobs. those people are not well known to you, they are harder to be typed - they need better skills and specific methods as VI. while to get good skills in VI may take years. sure you'll get low matches with others and me. to get good match with me you need comparable skills. or higher conformism
noobs never change
I've said 3 most possible types for you by videos: IEE, SEI and ILI. IEE as some more possible than other types.
If I'd say a single type without marks of doubts, than that meant I'm sure in that type what could be said I typed you there. The other is more correctly to name as an assumption about your type.
At now I think SEI as more possible than IEE. Based on your later forum's behavior and additional viewing of videos. It's still not an assured opinion, but as it's based on more data it's more stable.
P.S. that you sweared somewhere I did not saw. I do not read anything on the forum
Last edited by Sol; 11-07-2019 at 09:06 PM.
JinxKittie - mb ISFJ
Tatyana Brain (Tatiana2108fly) - ISFJ
Yekaterina Samoylova (Всё в Тебе) - ENTJ
Yelena (tarasovapsycholog) - INTP
0opsyDaisy - ISFJ
Last edited by Sol; 11-26-2019 at 11:10 PM.
Serena Williams.
Maria Holch - ESFP
Oleg Dvurechenskiy - ISFJ
Toxic_samka - INTP
Stanzi - ESFP
Ana de Armas - ESFP
Carrie Munro [5:00] - ESFP
Last edited by Sol; 05-09-2023 at 10:25 PM.
She is very captivating on screen. She has this mix of certitude and vulnerability. She seems very pure, but not contrived. She's great.
SEE can be your semiduality
Andrew Bustamante - ESFP
Maksim Popenker [left] - INTP
Anna from Miami - ISFJ
in USA in now moment, not married
Artyom Muratov [man] - ESFP
Perhaps, yes.
That woman is extremely engaging, nice interviewer, even if she is flirting like mad.
mb ESFP too
Ivanna Sakhno - INTP
Riley Gaines - ISFJ
Zyzz...SEE 3w2 sx/so
Shizzio...SEE 7w8 so/sx
Evgemiya Li - ISFJ
Jasmin Ouschan...ESI 3w4 sx/so
Laughing Witch - Se-SEE
I don't personally endorse PUA @suedehead but the videos are interesting regardless. Gonna have to agree with ESI type for that one dude, definitelyin the Ego block and is expressing a very Gamma attitude towards the whole thing. Yeah, sometimes it works, most the time it don't, but the information is there regardless. Yes, you can train yourself to be "Lothario Cad" as it were and some people want that lifestyle. I don't but hey, some people do and if they're going for it good for them.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
