Quote Originally Posted by Cone
Well, Russell is ENTp, complete with his writings that are so meandering you'd wish he'd just get to the point.

But seriously, don't say philosophy is only for Ne types (which you didn't but others have.) Wittgenstein has done much more in-depth and complex philosophy, stuff that even Russell couldn't handle, and Witt was INTp.
Who said that philosophy was just for Ne types? And I disagree, I think Russel pretty much nailed it on the head as far as philosophy is concerned (or rather as far as his school of philosophy is concerned.)

On the other hand, I think that Ne dominant types are the only one who can really appreciate Russel and know where he is coming from. Others will probably just give a big "HUH?" and totally miss the point of what he is trying to say. I have not read much from Wittgenstein, so I can not really comment much on whatever it was he has witten...