Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
I think that they have different types: left is ENFJ I think, right is ISFJ I think.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
argh! things with two heads creap me out...
If these girls share part of their body and still have separate types, then in my opinion type originates in the parts that htye don't share, upper part of the bdy in this case, IMO.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Well wouldn't type by definition originate in the brain?
All identical twins share the same genetic code, regardless of whether they're conjoined.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
As a general remark: It would suck to be conjoined with your conflictor.
Anyways if they have different types it would be sucky for socionics. Hardly genetic then. Of course we don't know their types so hard to be sure.
Types could be biological but not genetic. It could be related to hormone release while the fetus is developing or something.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Well if it is (mostly) not genetic that would be interesting since it would be possible to affect the development of the type after fertilization.Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
wouldn't it suck to be the straight guy if your conjoined twin were gay.
Or vice versa I suppose.Originally Posted by cracka
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
valid point.Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
do you think conjoined twins have alot of sex? I just can't see it happening... sorry...
(If I wasn't so scared of finding an answer I'd google this )
Somehow I think it would suck more for the straight guy...in case of men that is.Originally Posted by cracka
Anyways arranging your sexual life in that situation would be interesting...
I also wonder which of them controls the hands and feet...they only seem to have two of those.
my head is swimming with inappropriate comments after reading this postOriginally Posted by XoX
Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
hahahahahahahaha, no shit.
Ok so the famous Siamese Twins were married to twin sisters I think - at least sisters - and they had kids. So I guess they always had a foursome going is all I can guess.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
good lord why did I google this? I will not be posting links... but let's just say... "yeah! there's everykind of porn on the internets... "
rofl
hahahahaOriginally Posted by Bionicgoat
<3 Bionicgoat
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
LOL! I wonder if your inbox is flooded with PMs from curious members for those links.Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
INTp
sx/sp
lmao This thread is much more than I hoped for when I started reading.
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
Yes- we should all be proud of what this thread has accomplished for the conjoined twin cause...
(back to the original topic, I wonder if there's any data for conjoined twins taking the MBTI.... )
/edit I just did a real quick search and found about nothing except a stupid Uncyclopedia article on MBTI being written by two conjoined twins and a Jung beetle... (Uncyclopedia is retarded... if you're going to be doing something like that at least have a functioning sense of humor for God's sake! stupid!)
((I know cracka's comment was made to be funny, but if I may interject)
??????? Why? Could you please elaborate? People really only think that way because of ignorance. Homophobia is correlated with homosexual attraction anyway. So I imagine one of the conjoined twins would be indifferent and perhaps slightly uncomfortable while the other one really enjoyed it.Somehow I think it would suck more for the straight guy...in case of men that is.
Really what's to fear? If the straight man was comfortable with his sexuality and knew just who he was, why would they worry about it? They just wouldn't be that turned on, psycholoically speaking. It's certainly nothing to get hysterical about, however. Unless they're afraid they'd enjoy it perhaps?
And if one conjoined twin is gay and the other straight, I'd imagine the straight person would have to learn to live with it anyway. (and vice-versa) So no, I just don't see him freaking out. Straight men only act like that when they don't have much knowledge about homosexuality or if they're really a bit gay themselves. As Rush Limbaugh would say 'study after study has proven this!'
In a case like that I think they should sleep with both genders, so both of them would be happy and 'take one for the team' so to speak. ;D It's only fair...we're all probably bisexual anyway. I just get really annoyed at people who act like their privates would fall off if they happen to have sex with the gender they don't think they're attracted to, and it's usually both straight and gay men that put themselves in those roles.
I would think it would be uncomfortable regardless of gender specifics.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
dio, your thread just made my evening
greetings to bionicgoat - don't you think we're identicals? thankfully, not twins - check out my icon :wink:
@slacker mom - i might agree with you on the hormonal influence on one's type
my comment wasn't homophobic, it wasn't speaking bad about homosexuals at all. Or at least not meant to be anyway. You read WAAAAAY too far into my comment.Originally Posted by SLeo123083
To clearly put it:
"Somehow I think it would suck more for the straight guy...in case of men that is."
=
A straight man is gonna get a dick in the ass. <- that's it, no hidden meaning, no bashing of anything...
Whether he likes it or not, that's his thing...but speaking for myself here... I don't think I'd enjoy it. Do I have proof of this, nope... do I need any to give my opinion...no. That's about as much elaboration as i'd like to go into on that subject. Sorry if you were offended as this was not what I intended with my original post.
why would being conjoined to someone who is gay and has sex mean the straight conjoined twin would participate in gay sex? It just means he'd witness it.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
obviously he was referring to sex with the gay guyOriginally Posted by Slacker Mom
Why would he have sex with a gay guy? The assumption was that if conjoined twins could be different types, that one twin could be straight and one could be gay. Why would the straight one have gay sex with anyone?
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
This is perhaps the most inane conversation I've ever had. And that's saying a lot.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
depends on how they were joined I guess. as to how much the other conjoined person would feel of what's going on with the other. Since I know nothing of this kind of situation i'll just shut up about it.Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
[quote]I fully agree. *runs away from this topic*Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
Aaaaaah I see. Well I think in most cases conjoined twins have different hearts and stomachs and what-not so I'd think they'd generally have (for the most part) separate torsos. Though those girls were pretty darn connected.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
i would continue to argue this point, but... eh...
When writing my first reply this was what I was thinking of.Originally Posted by Slacker Mom
I do think this conversation is ironic after reading the title of it. Very Important...
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
THe question is this: ARE they the same type or different types? I am not sure.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
This has to be the funniest [and most least intentional] destruction of a sincere thread I have ever seen on this forum yet.
He asked a serious question ... let's get off of the bizaare crap ... Geeze.
THE BEARD HEARD HIS MOVEMENT AND MADE AN ATTACK RUN BUT DID NOT ACTUALLY ATTACK HIM
viva palestina