This is assuming you typed your mother correctly. Sorry but I really don’t think your (or Sol’s) typings are credible at this point. :/Originally Posted by Beautiful sky
This is assuming you typed your mother correctly. Sorry but I really don’t think your (or Sol’s) typings are credible at this point. :/
Credible? Who gives you the authority to determine who is credible? And I should know my mother ‘s type. I have had her for 40 years. You should consider that with that knowledge experience and a ton of experience in Socionics and mbti I would have the functions correct at least some of the time. Eyerolls at you.
Do me a favor if you’re going to continue being a Negativists B put me on ignore and save me the trouble of reading your dumb posts
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yeah, not really into censorship or protecting your eyes from my posts. I said what I said because I’ve realized you like to speak with authority while overturning other forum users’ self typings but despite your hubris it’s evident your typings are severely suspect and baseless (therefore your typings are uncredible). I’m actually not looking to fight you, but I’m not intimidated by your erratic behavior either.
To be fair, my typings aren’t always right, but I’m not a self proclaimed expert who can’t manage to be civil when I disagree with someone.
Last edited by MrsTortilla; 03-21-2019 at 09:23 PM. Reason: Added possessive apostrophe to a word. Hah
Like I’ve said before I will type based on the functions that I observe and I don’t go by type disphorea
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
and yet you can't identify functions in others
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Okay so at some point I’ll probably stop responding to you but I will just say that this isn’t accurate, and: probably it’s unhelpful to devalue the input of other forum users even when they haven’t explicitly stated the details of their functional analysis.
If you don't want to read her posts then you have to put her on ignore. Which is a great option by the way.
Not reading disagreeable posts is what I do.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
