Hey @DEAD ! Not here to add anything. Just wanted to say your threads are always fun to read through.
Hey @DEAD ! Not here to add anything. Just wanted to say your threads are always fun to read through.
Originally Posted by lkdhf qkb
If you did not care, you would not respond, but there is no point in continuing this argument, and I came off more harsh than should have
SLE's Se- (Model G) and Se+Fe (Model A).So I guess I should stay right next to you ?No need to get so Ti-offended about me having a different typing!
It's always interesting though how the Se base can get away with saying things.. I think because you exude force well, and then people with weaker Se as myself, are catching others off guard when we hit our Se hammer down... You insulted him worse than I and I insulted them without calling them name, just said what was said was of idiocy, not them, and they reacted worse to that.. Interesting.
I guess maybe mine is more calculated and thought out so it looks worse and aimed more, whereas yours was a fly on the impulse and just straight with it.
wdym? That's the theory yes but model A goes Se -> Ti -> Ne -> Fi(mental) & Si -> Te -> Ni -> Fe(vital) for SLE
Because you didn't get what I said and then accused me of stereotypical thinking intuition = smart, sensation = stupid. I never said that and it's pissing me off that I have to do your job and explain when you should just think and listen. He's just pissed lol
I admittedly only read the post where you typed him ILE. My eyes just went to ILE-Ti and Dead's SEE. I scan things mostly, being a result type.. Then I read his reaction fully (Tim's).. Then I read how you said you know best to him and the theoretical question post fully. Other than that, I did not see anything else
You being butthurt ain't necessary. You two write a lot of shit in your messages. Might not be SLEs but that's your problems if you've typed yourselves wrong.
SLE are result types. The tribalism, cultism & over-identification with type on this forum is pretty square, honestly
Sure, but not SEE nor ILE. The comment wasn't about SLE.
So, what shit are you butthurt about, you moralfag?
SLE are result types. The tribalism, cultism & over-identification with type on this forum is pretty square, honestlyI'm a result type. Some Pan-Jungian even battle-typing me as a Te type because I am inductive at first impression. Result types are inductive. Process types are deductive. At work, I'm more concerned about the result rather than my LSE dad who is concerned about the process. Everything is consistent with my SLE typing from Reinin's dichotomy to Model A to even Model G.
Besides, nobody in the Socionics community typed me as an ILE at all ever since I stop using MBTI logic into Socionics. People were literally laughing at that typing outside of the16types forum.
@Tim sounds like you know your shit
Quit posturing, poser. You're an internet dork who's gotten people to buy in to whatever horse shit you sell. In real life you're another childish mouthy LII-Ne.
People here type me all types of shit. They're wrong but theyre also retards. Relax, Princess. Ain't that serious
I'm not a poser at all. I am who I am. Everyone who knows me type me SLE. No one knows who the fuck are you. I'm not an LII-Ne. I'm not Se PoLR. I offend people like @thehotelambush with my Se. I have a good use of Se.
God, I want to stab you in the fucking face and pour acid on you, you bitchass retard motherfucker.
You wanna keep going, bitch. I could go on and on and I finna insult and threaten you until you cry uncle, @Stray Cat. LII-Ne and ILE my fucking ass.
Calm down guys. This is only the internet. Keep it civil and remember you might actually like each other in real life
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You're still posing with that crybaby rant. You're a Ti-dom intellect, obviously. You could "want" all you like. That shit at the end would never happen. Ever
Ne-creative. Si HA. Confiirmed.
Maybe. Who knows, man
I'm not crying nor posing at all. I'm angry. And it's a good thing to be angry. I am Ti valuing but in real life, my Fe is stronger than 1D. Now, why don't you fuck off, you cocksucking motherfucking shithead?
You both are SLE. Stop this retyping war . Make love not war
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It's more Se dominant and Fe mobilizing. Insulting and counterattack is Se. Fe is concerned about the emotional atmosphere.
Also, I doubt you're an SLE.
You rationalize, first. Ti-dom. Then you cap it off with an insult to convince you & others you're Se dom. You're telling me you're angry as if I give a shit. Sounds like Si seeking.
Look Tim is my friend!
We collaborate with each other on typing stuff all the time.
This is nonsense!
Just stop 🛑
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
And if I may add my two cents Se is sense perception. It doesn’t judge like Ti so it’s not always visible first
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Stray Cat has the advantage of being "anonymous" The little girl wants attention, thats all.
Nah. Your Ti is too strong for SLE. What you doubt or not is meaningless. You're an intellectual. Simple
anyone can make a troll account and be tough internet poster. just ignore it @Tim
Expression of emotions is Fe mobilizing. Rationalization is Ti valuing. I insult you because you deserve my insult and no one should have any power over me. It's not posing at all. That's my Se priority and my concern about control over this environment. So, why don't you shut the fuck up or I'm going to keep insulting you, you dimwit retard piece of shit?
My stalker returns. Being anonymous is an internet thing. Quit your manipulating
Only because he’s using it more here. Like I said sense perception doesn’t make judgments or differentiations. It only senses. He actually has written and made posts about the things he watches
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
And Fe is also stronger to be a Fe suggestive. If you are in Discord VC, you would hear me laughing, yelling, and are actually quite chill. I just used Ti more in a typology forum because typology is Ti.
I see a SEE
Se Se Se
SEEEEEEEEE
!!!!!!!!!!!!
More NT. More predictable intellectualization. You should own it, not pretend you're SLE.
@Beautiful sky. Pretty honorable to defend your friend & I get where you're coming from
Ok I guess you guys are upset
Remember anger blinds your vision
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I’m not JUST defending him
It’s the TRUTH
He’s SLE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't care. You're like my LII-Ne. Well liked, comical type. Not SLE. It's your life. If you want to believe you're SLE that's your problem.
Not NT at all. I'm 100% SLE, not posing or pretending. So, why don't you fuck off, you cunt?
I'm not sure who you're refering to here in all this confusion, but it's adorable and sweetly delivered.I see a SEE
Se Se Se
SEEEEEEEEE
!!!!!!!!!!!!
No. He isn't but it doesn't matter what I say. He's liked, I'm not. That's fine but that doesn't make it true
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
