Is there any socionics type that is very prone to being to being blunt and honest and you don't have to second guess their intentions and what you see is what you get from them?
Which socionics type is the most likely to be this way?
Is there any socionics type that is very prone to being to being blunt and honest and you don't have to second guess their intentions and what you see is what you get from them?
Which socionics type is the most likely to be this way?
Many LSEs seem to be aggressively blunt where more than a few SLIs seemed defensively blunt; I think it may be related to the type of data they seem to prefer and how they handle it as well as being somwhat literal and very narrowly focused. Although these two types have been known to tirelessly pursue the truth, they themselves may not always be all that truthful. Honesty isn't type related......
a.k.a I/O
ESE can be like that
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
SLI
SLI seem honest to me, but the most blunt? I can't see it.
Types that have 4D Fe + 4D Se are more likely to be that way... followed by types having 4D Se and 4D Te.
Honesty is more Te than Fe, I'd say.
Estp estj esfj istp god who else lol
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Nah, just obvious. ESE and LSE come to mind. The more infuriating are the ones who talk transparent BS and do not even know themselves. Some mirage types...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Delta STs are not that good at being blunt ime.. I'm going with LSI.
Depends, I think. LSIs can be avoidant of issues, especially if they’re E5. Then they just won’t talk about whatever subject until the end of time.
I agree with @Tallmo for ESE. They usually know when it’s best to shut up, but they like to speak their mind more than most, and they tend to have definite opinions about things and people.
Most blunt and dishonest - Maritsa
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
...and I forgot to mention DCNH subtypes. Obviously the most direct and blunt is the Dominant subtype.
On the NEO PI instrument, there is the trait "Straightforwardness":
"Straightforwardness is the quality of directness and honesty in communicating with others. Despite a long history in moral philosophy, straightforwardness is not as vital to personality theory as the other facets of agreeableness.[21] Those scoring high on straightforwardness tend to interact with others in a direct and honest manner. Low scorers are less direct, tend to be high in self-monitoring, and are generally deceitful or manipulative. Although the two concepts are not identical, those who score low on this facet tend to be high in Machiavellianism.[22] Straightforwardness is similar to a dimension in the Interpersonal circumplex called "Ingenuous versus calculating."[21] According to Michael C. Ashton and Kibeom Lee, straightforwardness is similar to the honesty aspect of honesty-humility in the HEXACO Model."
According to this:
It is primarily identified as very much not a "T" thing. Other correlations were not regarded as statistically significant.
Bluntness is not easy to quantify - do we mean that a person willingly expresses exactly (accurately) what is on their mind? That strictly should come under the single trait "Straightforwardness", but could also come under higher level traits such as low Conscientiousness and high Neuroticism.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
SLI. You got one right here.
I can't take this anymore
And I'm almost pretty sure
I've been here before
Socioville Discord: https://discord.gg/yAfc4ZU
ESE, LIE-Ni, LSE, and SLI for most blunt, not necessarily in that order. Kind of odd that it's mostly Si egos and no Se egos and mostly peripheral/non-Se valuing quadra types.
LSI-Se, ILE-Ti, SLE-Ti are among the least straightforward.
Last edited by Disturbed; 04-21-2024 at 04:06 PM.
Most honest in expression people should be in own strong and valued regions. As they wish to influence on others there the most.
Blunt... from common sense this should be against Fi. Also should influence IR, subjective perception.
Without IR the expected degree, in order: Ti, Te, Fe, Fi types.
From this point also, Fe may be most blunt _when want_. As understand how influence on emotions and are not holded by caring about being emotionally pleasant.
Example of IR influence. Fe can be much annoyed by Te arguments, and find geting of them as _personally insulting_, opponent as "blunt", showing general disrespect to them. As when they get disagreements about what is supposed as logically objective. Not rare situations when Fe whine to mods "I demand to ban him", to an opponent "don't say disagreements with me" after seeing disagreements about own profile types and other related to types, especially when logically objective (Te) argumented by their doubtful noobish skills, when they did not researched own type thoroughly by themselves, by common doubtful typing accuracies.
If Fe will be catched on proved and objective misleading, - this can be evaluated as "personal insult" and the opponent as "annoying", despite the problem is on other side. The better arguments were - the worse moral value the opponent will get, the lauder barking to his side may to happen. Sometimes supported by another lie and nonsense, geting reasonable criticism against which will worsen the situation and personal hate.
F types accept disagreements logically based and about logical - harder. Negative IR make the perception of that as additionally bad "personal insult".
Useful to take into account when talk with cute and kiddy F types! If wish them to stay cute further.
Last edited by Sol; 12-15-2023 at 02:45 PM.