-
-
Last edited by toska; 08-11-2021 at 09:57 PM.
this is absolute genius
I’ve been told I have a mischievous smile that’s up to no good - Beta for the win
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
how people smile should more depend what F kind in ego and is it 1 or 2 function there, than by quadras
LIE and LSE ; IEI and SEI etc should smile much similarly
This pattern is ok. I think there is also a pattern with DCNH:
D: Broad confident sort of smile
C: Mischievous "I'm hiding something" smile
N: Reserved smile like they're holding a shit in.
H: Sort of wistful expression combined with "I'm enjoying myself/I'm at peace"
There are claims that says that logicals tend to exhibit asymmetric smile.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Ok I'm about to confirm the Gamma smile theory. Here is an LIE I know and how he smiles in almost every picture of his.
Gamma Smile.jpg
I threw the ILI with hair in there just for fun.
And this is in pictures only, outside of pictures you almost never see this.
The thing with gamma smile is that I don't whether it LIEs or not because I can not see his eyes.
That is the main thing what people should do when deciphering fake smILEs.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
my friend just shared this post with me, i was like, hey, that's who has been helping me, i told you he was good! : )
20191109_222550.jpg 20191110_133804.jpg
Bruh. That caricature you put as the Beta header is literally me
Apparently I have an "Si" smile alpha/delta
Hi wow you're EIE Welcome to the forum @Sol Maybe you should interview Nass to learn about Fe.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
smiles are so momentary and so changing based on so many factors that I couldn't label by type but this was a fun thread nevertheless.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@NASS CODA brings the humor hard, I hope he comes around more!
lol oh wow, haha, that's sweet. thanks nass
It is obviously appealing (because it might simplify type detection), but I have trouble seeing the similarities between the headers and most of the samples.