Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[vesstheastralsilky]

Seems ILE

She reminds me of my old best friend - dual - who died, and reminds me of another NT alpha friend who also tested correctly as LII.

But extravert here.

[Aramas]

Seems ILE

She reminds me of my old best friend - dual - who died, and reminds me of another NT alpha friend who also tested correctly as LII.

But extravert here.

She's ILE.

[Raver]

She's ILE.

I initially typed her as either IEE or SEE so it is interesting to see her typed as ILE and SLE. I just don't see creative or demonstrative personally. Maybe I am missing her using and she avoids using because she doesn't value it at her own detriment.

I can buy ILE way more than SLE anyways as I felt I shared some similarities with her, but there were some differences too so ILE could explain it. SLE seems too far fetched for her judging by her general behavior. She doesn't resemble any SLEs I know, even the females.

[Aramas]

I initially typed her as either IEE or SEE so it is interesting to see her typed as ILE and SLE. I just don't see creative or demonstrative personally. Maybe I am missing her using and she avoids using because she doesn't value it at her own detriment.

I can buy ILE way more than SLE anyways as I felt I shared some similarities with her, but there were some differences too so ILE could explain it. SLE seems too far fetched for her judging by her general behavior. She doesn't resemble any SLEs I know, even the females.

Some thinkers are not great thinkers, and some thinkers are better with people than feelers. Huh.

[Raver]

Some thinkers are not great thinkers, and some thinkers are better with people than feelers. Huh.

That's true, Socionics doesn't explain other factors that can influence behavior and personality. However, I just haven't seen the evidence for creative and PoLR yet, but base and HA makes sense based on what I've seen from her so I'll acknowledge Ne-ILE as a possibility for her type.

[ragnar]

I initially typed her as either IEE or SEE.

I get those vibes too, my current bet is on SEE.

[Raver]

Her green new deal just got rejected: https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/h...6hres109ih.pdf

After you read it, it's difficult to tell whether she has dreadful , doesn't value it at all or both. Her ideas sound great in theory, but anyone with a modicum of knowledge of economics will know that it won't work well in practice.

[Kill4Me]

I pegged her type before anybody.

Cortez is ESE-Si 2w3 sp/so

I cracked the VI for every socionics type on this pinterest. Note that its a clear VI match for ESE-Si:

https://www.pinterest.com/socionics/ese-si/

I cracked the gestalt for each type, wing and stack. Note that it's a clear match for the the insatiable-seductive gestalt: 2w3.

https://stackemup.livejournal.com/

I cracked the VI for every stacking. Note that its a clear VI match for sp/so (though I need to put more sp/so exxamples up there):

https://www.pinterest.com/stackemupennea/

That brings me to 2w3 sp/so. Fictional counterpart: Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz.

Everything else you need to know about enneagram types is here:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ype-Wing-Stack

Oh and by the way, I had the lion's head avatar before anybody on any forum.

[khcs]

I pegged her type before anybody.

Cortez is ESE-Si 2w3 sp/so

I cracked the VI for every socionics type on this pinterest. Note that its a clear VI match for ESE-Si:

https://www.pinterest.com/socionics/ese-si/

I cracked the gestalt for each type, wing and stack. Note that it's a clear match for the the insatiable-seductive gestalt: 2w3.

https://stackemup.livejournal.com/

I cracked the VI for every stacking. Note that its a clear VI match for sp/so (though I need to put more sp/so exxamples up there):

https://www.pinterest.com/stackemupennea/

That brings me to 2w3 sp/so. Fictional counterpart: Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz.

Everything else you need to know about enneagram types is here:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ype-Wing-Stack

Oh and by the way, I had the lion's head avatar before anybody on any forum.

[nanashi]

She seems mostly Se, honestly. She doesn't come off like she has any real understanding of the issues she's discussing, she usually seems like she's just winging it. For example... she quickly put together a plan to save the planet from human pollution without consulting qualified scientists, but the plan doesn't actually address the most important issues pertaining to climate... deforestation, ocean pollution, overpopulation... especially in developing nations. It's also a totally inefficient use of resources, even toward that end... nonetheless she appears to be utterly convinced her spuriously hatched plan is the only valid path forward for humanity...
Her main strength seems to be that she's the most F-able figure in politics. Probably has gone through most of her life being the most or second most F-able woman in the room, which has caused her to greatly overestimate her actual importance / intelligence.
Her fixation on this grand, bad idea is not atypical of someone with repressed Ni.
A Ne dominant type would have had a better plan. Hell I actually support a few dramatic environmental policies.. her plan is just simply bad.
I say SLE ...
I can see the argument for some kind of Fe as well. She seems to go sort of batshit when she senses that people disagree with her ideas, and usually some kind of Fe related offense gets balled up in there. Moral outrage is the hammer she uses to whack her political opponents back into their holes.
Maybe the Fe subtype of SLE. I agree she's generally not a serious thinker, but that's probably an IQ issue more than an actual typology issue, probably has an IQ of about 115. Combined with the fact she's dealing with complex issues and in way over her head.

"​Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation account for about 28 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, making it the largest contributor of U.S. GHG emissions. Between 1990 and 2018, GHG emissions in the transportation sector increased more in absolute terms than any other sector."epa.gov