Originally Posted by
Disturbed
ILE-Ti seems likely, given the facts that his mother was an administrator and his father an engineer, SEEs aren't all that likely to be administrators without trying to be politicians and are even less likely to be refrigerator/refrigeration engineers (a lot of people overlook characteristics about their parents when typing people; parental characteristics should be looked at when trying to type someone IMO). SEEs usually aren't that charming or smooth and they're more domineering and they can get pretty angry, Will Smith doesn't seem to get real angry and his smile seems kind of forced (though he does smile a lot in photos for an ILE-Ti). Kanye West seems more like an SEE than Will Smith does (though I'd have to look up his parents' occupations to have a better idea), and Will Smith seems much less angry and much less hurt and much cooler and much more gentle than West does.
I'm open to SEE, but ILE-Ti seems more likely, SEEs aren't usually that playful or charming in the way Will Smith is or always happy looking and they seem like they get angrier, there are no reports I know of where Will Smith lost it. I really haven't seen him in much though and I haven't really seem him move much. Tina Fey has those classic ILE-Ti movements (like when she runs off the screen in the video where she's talking about playboy) and facial expressions (especially her photo on IDRlabs.com under the INTP section) that are just as charming and sexy as her humor and she comes across as very feminine.
SEE can resemble ILE-Ti though even in appearance and on stage, when performing except ILE-Ti are more likely to have those cute and sexy clumsy movements. SLE-Se and SLE-Ti don't look as 100% as elegant or feminine when performing as ILE-Ti does (compared to the ILE-Ti and SEE, SLE are more repetitive and change their tactics less, they cycle less, and are just trying to get their way, and when they appear arrogant or boast, you can tell that they can't judge talent all that well, that their insights were picked up from somewhere else if they're right and are often wrong if they came up with them themselves, they don't engage the audience as well as elegantly probably because they're declaring rather than asking), the former just, SLE just look, more masculine and less natural when seeking attention (usually) compared to ILE-Ti, their crudeness can be feminine, but it's not as logical-sounding, feminine sounding as the ILE-Ti's crudeness. Also, SEE and ILE speak with more precision, have less redundancy than SLE do. SLE are one of my favorite types, but their work isn't anywhere near as good as they think it is (it's better than mine though), Newt Gingrich being one of the very worst on that, some of his things I listen to and watch (though I usually disagree with him), but they're really mediocre at best. I supported Ron Paul, then several years after he left congress, I became disillusioned with him because he or managers of all these things he set up kept asking for money and I was wondering why he did it. During that time I became disillusioned with him, I kind of thought maybe Gingrich was right about some things, but then the more I payed attention to him, the more I realized he was wrong and that his ideas still were not anchored in reality and that he really wasn't scientific or methodical or technical or stylish or accurate at all. Trump was a little bit better and more anchored in reality than Newt Gingrich, but he still has that SLE shit where he sometimes doesn't have much idea which "brains to borrow" or can't (because the very brightest minds haven't wanted to work with him though they probably wouldn't work for me for long either) or is too unyielding and thinks his ideas and reasoning are the best or that he knows and understands as much as he acts like he does. But, he did fire Bolton which was great and he did pick Mike Pence and Pence would make a better President than Trump (other than his support for war with Iran, when it's obvious that they're not a threat to the U.S.A., attacking them is unethical, and going to war against them, especially if Trump did it, would be costly to America; Pence could probably do it with less risk and more efficiency, but again there is no proof that they want to attack the U.S.A, as Bolton's views were too one sided, unrealistic, and neglected too many facts and many, many highly intelligent libertarians like Ilana Mercer and her followers and Ron Paul are saying don't do it and some of them like Stephan Kinsella seem to believe that radical decentralization of political power and cooperation of some kind could work well when it could; they did in the past; we haven't had any recent dispassionate presidents who favored cooperatism, radical decentralism, and who had the originality, intuition of possibilities, knowledge and thorough understanding of history, and ability to determine cause and effect and why the government is so aggressive and why it shouldn't be, and who weren't my country right or wrong kind of people; that's the biggest problem we have is our leaders tend to think our country will always be right; the other countries certainly aren't right all the time either, but given the power we have had, we've abused it both against the U.S.A. and the rest of the world; I have some hope that will change though and that we will return to and stay with radical decentralization of political power or at least more sensible and ethical and less aggressive and ultimately more safe foreign policy).