She not only punched herself in the face for the pics but also planned this setup for the last two years.
http://www.etonline.com/news/190049_...epp_exclusive/
She not only punched herself in the face for the pics but also planned this setup for the last two years.
http://www.etonline.com/news/190049_...epp_exclusive/
sure. it's true love, when people are divorced after 1 year and Depp is not old man with money, while modeling is not doubtful business.
if she had sexual relations with own sex, then she's possibly just lesbian, not bisexual (bisexuality is doubtful to extst at all) - this only rises the possibility of that she made marriage for money and other profit, not because feelings and for borning children. this is what "whores" do
kidergardern
this reminds me of when i was listening to the commentary for the first 'pirates of the caribbean' movie years ago, the commentary with depp and i can't remember who. unless it was an interview. anyway the point is, depp was saying how the scene with keira knightley on the beach when they get drunk and jack tries to come onto her briefly, how he didn't feel comfortable with it because of how young she was. i was thinking it was rather respectable of him in a way. but something about his staunch uptight tone sent a bit of a warning bell through me because i detected traditional (and controlling) attitudes concerning women... it probably reminded me of my dad who had traditional views of gender roles and would become abusive when my mom stepped outside of her appropriate role. anyway i can wring a lot of unfair speculations out of a single sentence a person says, so i'm just creating idle gossip. *slaps own wrist*
keira knightley's free spirited ness in her commentary track probably reminded me of my mom who is lead and has that bon vivant spirit about her too (especially when she was younger).
putting the two together => "danger!" reaction in my subconscious
While I dont condone domestic violence in any way or for any reason and think Depp is a shitstain if guilty, I strangely dont really feel bad for her in the way as would usually be a reflex reaction for other women (part of it is because she's antipathic, but also because she seems like a really strong person - there's nothing vulnerable about her, so I kinda feel like she would get offended if people would feel sorry for her (maybe I'm projecting a bit). She has this big girl that can take care of herself vibe. I think she's SEE.
i don't have really any feelings about either of them. i know very little about him and virtually nothing about her.
I said "technically" good – they are in the same Quadra and of the same Club. But that's about it, haha. What you are (unknowingly) referring to is probably the "repulsive" vibe. According to this site, both Identity and Mirror give off "repulsive spiritual vibes", which I actually agree with. Personally, I am also not into dating a Mirror or Identical. So, I can relate to this concept. Having said that, there are certainly way worse relations than Identity and Mirror (both relations are still frequently encountered among couples IME), even though other relations may seem much more attractive in comparison.
Yeah @inumbra I am wary of men who consistently prefer relationships with much younger women for that reason.
Lolz @ peeps using celeb gossip sites as citations for what amounts to funnily enough nothing more than gossip and hearsay. Depp is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law depending on how far Heard wants to take her allegations. I would rather have that dictate the truth of what occurred between these two than advertising/shock driven "journalism" of TMZ or People. Everything else about Depp or Heard's supposed past character flaws seems thin at best. It probably wasn't the best idea for Heard to take this to the court of public opinion given how ambiguous much of the evidence is in her favor and the typical backlash she will receive from the masses. In the short term it creates a fervor, but doesn't serve her case or her career particularly well in the long term. Depp seems to be handling it well by taking the hands-off, don't talk about it approach. He's also got a fan base on his side, along with people who just generally mistrust women who allege abuse. Heard and her handlers should have been more judicious about this, in my opinion.
Last edited by blank; 06-30-2016 at 06:31 PM.
I'm not 100% convinced of depps guilt, though I think it's likely. I just saw the typical "lying whore & bitch" sentiment snowballing and stepped on it.
this is ESI
and this wobbly, grimacing and weak looking is INFP
just compare
in interviews you'll feel similar
@SisOfNight
She looks so jaded and dead inside. =/
johnny-depp.jpg
Johnny Depp was my first celebrity crush when I was 12 and he was on 21 Jumpstreet on TV. I guess he is SEI.
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
Agree on SEI. He seems Ne/Si valuer.
Last edited by khcs; 02-02-2020 at 02:36 PM.
Extinguishment Inter-type Relationship "I can't take this anymore"
plausible EIE is plausible EIE
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
EIE
EIE through and through
now that's interesting.
Ni-creative.....hm. he's so often typed iei or sei or eii or esi, and none were totally satisfying to me...
i wonder.
I'm thinking a nice test for this proposed typing would be SEI (?) Julianne Moore interaction with Depp in Benny & Joon.
or some other SEI whose typing seems solid.
To say that bisexuality exists (especially in noticable % quantity) needs _objective_ measures of sexual _attraction_. This attraction should be strong (when it touches feelings deeply - comparable to heterosexual attractions of normal people) and stable to both sexes. Self-reports and behavior is not reliable for this.
Today is possibly to measure objectively only an existence of sexual reactions on people of different sexes. For men it's easier possibly. It's how homosexuality disorder mb diagnosed. But there were no objective researches about strong passion feelings. While it's important as in case of sexual behavior experience - it's possibly to be trained to react (including by fantasies without real partners), - that would be secondary reaction, but not primary sexual attraction. Only an abbility to feel strong sexual passion would be good mark that people of that sex attract seriously.
When such objectve research will appear - then there will be good basis to say that bisexuality exists. Until that - it's subjectve in what you believe and so no basis for arguing.
At least, there should be distinguished people with some kind of sexual behavior and people having those primary sexual attractions. In too many cases it should not match. Bisexual behavior itself is not bisexuality and self-reports mean not much about this.
The situation partly is similar to how deal with transexuality today. There were criterions for this disorder until 1980s which pointed that it's very rare (to perceive own sex as different). While today it can be enough to say that you are unicorn and then you may get this mark officially. What is a joke and misleading as there are many secondary reasons which may lead to some sexual behavior and self-descriptions. An example of what can be homosexual disorder which lead to a wish to have easier possibility of sex with people of own sex and so to change a look closer to opposite sex. That human is not transexual - he does not perceive himself as opposite sex, only plays it alike transvestit.
Same with bisexuality - it just may be played and mb get secondary adoption to this game as surface sexual interest. There is nothing objective to say that it exists, or exists in noticable quantity comparable with homosexuality how it's claimed.
But you weren't saying it exists. YOU DID say 'IT PROBABLY DOESN'T EXIST.' That's statement requires a totally different approach in logic.
and that is a statement it's likely inadvisable to make, to say nothing of your not backing it when it comes to logic.
I'm not trying to shame you nor do I want you to feel attacked or something.
"Bisexual behavior itself is not bisexuality and self-reports mean not much about this."
you've just given your rhetorical partners the exact template for challenging all your assertions about HETEROsexuality, provided they switch in the word.
Physical arousal can be due to a cold breeze or even a certain posture that means one's genitals sense nearby fabric, etc.
And scientific researchers just use sensors to note blood flooding to the genitals to determine arousal, so it's not challenging for them to note arousal in any of the sexes.
And that arousal has been clocked in the lab as taking the same amount of time for people of female or male sex, btw. Interesting counter to our cultural myths on sex arousal.