Examples of Socionics Alpha types

[myresearch]

alpha SF?
Yeah, i think he is ESFj

I think he is definitely S, but I dont see enough Fe, what makes you think that he can be Fe ego?

[myresearch]

what type do you think he is then? I think Ej by non-verbal and body language and Si ego, but not Delta ST. So ESFj.

I am not sure. I also think he is j type instead of p. I can see some Si, but that could be demonstrative function. So maybe LSx type.

He seems more logical than ethical. So I don't understand why you think ESE>delta ST.

[myresearch]

I don't think he has 1D Fe at all. So that would leave LSE or ESE.

He may seem emotionally expressive, facial expression wise, in other words, he doesn't have a poker face, but that doesn't leave out 1D Fe to me, especially Fe seeking.

I don't think he is using any F (both Fi and Fe) very efficiently, he seems sound to me, logical. So I don't think he is F type. If you do or someone else thinks so, I am curious why you think that way. Maybe you are seeing something I don't.

and idk for Delta ST, just intuition I guess. why demo Si?

I am seeing some Si but I am not sure about its position, just sure that it is strong and not ignoring, so it could be demo, but it could also be creative, I have to watch more videos to be sure.

[myresearch]

Actually, I think that's a good reason for him not being 1D Fe, because Fe is intelligent about responsive towards the affective or emotional responses in its environment - and he responds to it well enough. And not the passive sort of response Fe suggestives have but on closer level, like close to that of an equal. I mean, that's not to say it couldn't be role though. Just there's not the power differential that typically tends to exist when someone's suggestive is being activated.

Yeah, it's hard for me rationalize introversion for him, I think he is an extrovert.

There are different representatives of types, that's why there is two sub-system and DCHN. I don't expect Ti-doms to have a poker face, they might have it as Fi-doms can also have it. Being responsive towards the emotional environment or having facial expressions dont exceed the limititations of 1D Fe. LxI types are emotive according to Reinin dichotomies.

I think it is more important to focus on how someone process and use info, rather than looking at their level of sociality etc.

Strong Fe is definitely seem different. They directly control the direction of emotional atmosphere. Since it is a dynamic function, you can generally see that person is more aware of the crowd, cameras in those kind of interviews. Lately I have watched interview videos of Matthew Goode, Ewan Mcgregor. When you see that they don't actually use that much expression or use it more wisely, it becomes easier to differentiate strong Fe (and not ignoring) from low Fe.

Kevin Mckidd seems very static, hence I start to think LSI>LSE for him. Probably C or D type in Gulenko's system. He probably has so first as instinctual stacking.

[myresearch]

This is what I had talked about in the post you quoted.


I think role Fe does not care about controlling it, but they are able to respond to it that isn't helpless to Fe suggestiveness or 'manipulation' if you will, as LXI could be (you may simply choose to not respond to activation of your dual seeking function too, if you wanted to).

Kevin McKidd seems to do this pretty well.

Are you actually seeing Ti>Te in his cognition?

Yes, I think Ti>Te for him. I think he seems friendly and confident on camera regardless of his type. However, I don't think he is aware and in control as much as strong Fe types.


I tried to think of LSE to give example, right now only Tom Selleck come to my mind.