He reminds me of somebody ..
He reminds me of somebody ..
Last edited by silke; 06-29-2014 at 09:16 AM. Reason: updated links
He's beta... I have to watch a few more interviews to say for sure which one
Yeah, I wonder. He reminds me of one dude I'm training that's some macaulay culkin/haley joel osment kind of guy. He's pretty inquisitive and confirmation seeking. Probably one of the better new hires I've had lately. But then again, most of the people I've been training lack intensity and/or are hobbits.
You're a personal trainer? Beat those old peoples' asses.Originally Posted by munenori
4w3-5w6-8w7
ENTP
The Jake Gyllenhal type.
Definitely irrational...some EP?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Fe INFp?
Def merry. Merry son'a bitch.
The end is nigh
oooh!
The end is nigh
You sure he's not ENFj?
Wow, I finally found out who strrrng reminds me of...this guy.
:/ strrrng looks more scary (and is)
I'm guessing INFp. definitely
Hi! I'm an ENFP. :-)
Sadly, yes.
EDIT: totally seems INFp though.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Personally I think the guy is some EP, maybe IEE or SEE even.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I agree on EP, and think NT as a general temperament.
Languid, removed, laid-back; doesn't seem in any way grounded or present enough to be an Se ego type. I suppose IEE is plausible.
4w3-5w6-8w7
Ahh, but does he remind you of me?
...aside from being an obvious 3w4 :wink:
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Why? Are you my ILE 3w4 benchmark now?
4w3-5w6-8w7
He does resemble me in some ways, but idk if he VI's like me. Could be the bug eyes . I don't ever make those expressions to my knowledge, though.
There doesn't seem to be many interviews of him.
The end is nigh
whatever type he is, he's starting to look kinda creepy. i thot i picked up on an Ni gaze in one of those pix....
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
This one reminds me of strrrng.
He has this relaxed and flaccid demeanor.
The end is nigh
I'm not sure. Strrrng looks more focused; like ready to spring into battle at any minute. On the other hand, Macaulay looks like the sort of person that wouldn't withstand a direct attack effectively. He would wilt like a flower under an acid rain.
LMAO whoops!
The end is nigh
LOL @ this:
I am still pondering his type. I have a feeling it may be something different than what is being proposed. More to follow.
I finally found a decent video interview of him where you can actually discern things:
Saved! - Macaulay Culkin & Eva Amurri Interview | SPIKE
He's looking ESTj to me. I used to think he was ENTp a long time ago because of the stereotypes attributed to them and how he seemed to play that kind of role in Home Alone. However it does not seem like a fit.
Furthermore, his energy level seems too high to be static and EP. EPs have an "at rest" quality to them, and from watching Culkin's videos and expressions in pictures, there seems to be a forward push to his energy.
He IS reactive and seemingly spontaneous behaviorally, which I can see as tempting to pin as EP, but this is not the same thing.
As a side note, he has the sort of controlled prep-ness I've seen in Deltas which differs from any I've seen in Alphas.
He is likely a 3w4.
In typing him, I think his relationship with Michael Jackson, Fi INFj (maybe some 4) is something to consider.
Let's compare an ENTp 3 with him, since that is one consideration proposed in this thread:
See the difference in facial expressions, how Bale's are more fixed, static, and at rest while Culkin's are quite lively and even "directive" - as in reaching out? Also, Culkin seems immediately focused and immersed in his environment, while ENTps always seem to have a quality of looking in from the outside, observing the abstractions latent in what goes on in front of them. Si egos dwell in the actual environmental context development and can sometimes have a look of "looking out" to what Ne abstractions lie outside the immediate experience.
A second comparison, Hayden Christensen, Ti ENTp (possible 3 as well, maybe 2 wing)
The same contrast applies with Christensen and Culkin as with Bale and Culkin. Christensen, like Bale, is at rest, passively reactive, unlike the active dynamic-directive energy of Culkin.
This is also why I'm disinclined toward ENFp either, although that's closer than some of the other choices. I don't think ESFj because he doesn't seem to be an F-type, and he doesn't seem "affecting" in that way.
Btw I'm not in the mood to debate Bale's type, so for those who do not have the same reference point as me in that regard, take it as you wish.
Apparently he's a badass ISTj who puts environmental boundaries to rest by bitching people out on set.Originally Posted by Steve
4w3-5w6-8w7
I remember him talking about his homosexuality with Barbara Walters in an interview about 5-10 years ago.
IMO, Macaulay Culkin is strongly reminiscent of Vladimir Putin, who is supposed to be Se-ISTj
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Culkin is much more open than Putin. Maybe he is SLE? I did think EP at first. I would take SEE before SLE, though.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Putin is a Ti-ISTj.
I highly doubt that Macauley Culkin is the same type... When one watches interviews, what strikes me is his engrossment in Ni... The two types I consider are Fe-INFp and Ni-ENFj.
Again, in typing--to think about temperaments before one thinks about what functions are used always seems to lead to erroneous typings.
Don't forget my suggestions: IEE and SEE.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
he VIs in some photos just like Vladimir Putin and looks quite like an LSI-Se friend I had growing up. Culkin is definitely LSI-Se.
If we trust VI he is logical because of asymmetric smile.
Slight but clear almost everywhere. Anyway, it makes me wonder how many logicals have asymmetric smile? I don't think I have...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org