Vortical Synergetic Cognition

[mfckr]

.

[Gilly]

You can also restate the cognitive styles like:

CD: Static Reductionist
DA: Dynamic Reductionist
HP: Static Holist
VS: Dynamic Holist

I am tempted to wonder if my "reductionist" style of speech was something you confused for Ne in your initial typing of me. DA fits me to the letter.

[woofwoofl]

Would a pond of EJ ( or ) data, where if a new drop comes in, the pool of EJ is displaced in ripples in such a manner that can be tracked by IP ( or , aarrgg unintentional pun ) be a good graphical representation of Vortigal Cognition?

[mfckr]

.

[woofwoofl]

Nice! especially starting at 1:45 and on out... I assume the "static" orange train-track type vortex would be the IP / elements, and it's the "dynamic" / EJ elements that are sparks of light, always following a sort of path determined by the IP elements?

[mfckr]

.

[Aiss]

^ I'm a clear MBTI P type, could never be J in that system... so maybe I should translate to TiNe, as I initially tried, who knows. Otherwise, typical P characterstics from MBTI translate to Socionics irrationality, at least in IP/Ip case, and correlation fails.

[Gilly]

I've noticed this in my ISFp mom, where she'll have these little talks with me about how there is no such thing as a 'right way' or dependable course of action to take in any given situation. I more understood this as her catching on to my E6 ticks though.

I think DA thinking kind of necessitates this approach, because the overriding concern is to maintain a form of balance inherent in dynamic-negativist thinking, of keeping certain factors under control for the purpose of preventing negative outcomes. Interestingly enough DA thinkers are all at the beginning of their quadras in terms of quadra progression, likely serving as a necessary harness of sorts for their overly ambitious quadrant mates: static Positivists seek to create some form of extant priority, while dynamic negativists head off detrimental consequences or impinging factors. The other pair, holographic and vortex, are focused on producing a specificsingle effect rather than something intended to be (semi) permanent. Vortex thinking looks for the opportune moment to strike, while holographic shifts perspective in order to take advantage of the situation.

[krieger]

i actually have to reformulate that. Result is the mentality of opportunism and vortex cognition is one lopsided half of it. i would actually not describe it as "making use of" as it's too shallow and inconstant to qualify. it's more like an activity of finding, relating and sharing opportunities, juggling them, in a word, whilst being at a loss as to how to deal with them potently.

[IBTL]

i actually have to reformulate that. Result is the mentality of opportunism and vortex cognition is one lopsided half of it. i would actually not describe it as "making use of" as it's too shallow and inconstant to qualify. it's more like an activity of finding, relating and sharing opportunities, juggling them, in a word, whilst being at a loss as to how to deal with them potently.

Well, however you prefer to phrase it, it's quintessentially the recognition and then subsequent utilization of an opening within a process or structure wherein exquisite precision is valued over fallout.