Article: INFp The Lyricist Profile by Gulenko

[Squirrel]

It's not usual type for psychology and astrology-alike Socionics sites. Should not write for long on them and hence to be in significant quantity.

Yes , but lack of possibility doesn't mean its absence

[Sol]

Yes , but lack of possibility doesn't mean its absence

Means small chance for "significant quantity" in any of time.
Among active ones I remember Abby, who thought such type and mb had it. With me it would be 2. +Random ones who could register and post for short time, what would arise to ~3 in rare periods. At now it's only -1 compared to the past.

Weak N + Te factual objectivity + J rationality -> lowest interest to esoterics, muddy hypotheses and alike.
Socionics forums are full of Fe types, then Ti-N, then others with LSE at the end.